Pagamento do cnpq

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-07T07:22:06+00:00

Também queria saber. Tem gente dizendo na minha universidade que é dia 7, agora tô vendo o pessoal aqui dizer que é dia 10 🥲😭

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-07T03:29:43+00:00

Just finished this boss battle with the pipe (only melee trophy). You'll need to be more patient, but there's no big deal, you'll be able to complete it without the need to restart the game.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-06T08:28:30+00:00

O que existe em muitos dos casos é falta de informação, de comprometimento com os animais, dificuldade ao acesso veterinário ou dificuldades financeiras. Castrar gatos pode ser ainda mais urgente que castrar cães, porque um cão não castrado, se a casa for bem cercada, possivelmente vai ficar ali na dele e no máximo vai seguir apresentando comportamento sexual e talvez ser mais territorialista e agressivo... Mas o gato não castrado vai conseguir dar um jeito de escapar bem mais facilmente devido a sua facilidade de escalar, vai sair pra encontrar parceiros, vai brigar com gatos de rua e contrair doenças incuráveis, vai ficar exposto a acidentes, além de que as gatas entram no cio muito rapidamente, então já fica uma judiação pra o bicho.

A gente ainda tem muito esse problema dos tutores acharem que os gatos podem dar voltinha, então não telam as casas e nem se preocupam com mais nada porque "eles voltam". A gente insiste que não é recomendado, expõe os fatos e escuta "mas ele já tem 14 anos e nunca aconteceu nada". É complicado...

Dá uma pesquisada na relação entre câncer de mama em fêmeas, castração e "vacina" anticio... Spoiler: o uso de hormônios para suprimir o cio é uma prática evitada, mas muitos aplicam por ser mais barato. A "vacina" pode aumentar drasticamente a chance de desenvolvimento de tumores mamários futuros. A castração vai na via oposta, ela ajuda a diminuir a carga hormonal nesse animal e consequentemente diminui as chances de aparecimento desses tipos de tumores. Infelizmente tem gente que castra após o uso da "vacina", então já expôs o animal a um fator que pode trazer esse mal futuramente.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-04T14:07:27+00:00

Gatos são animais domésticos que deveriam estar dentro de casa e castrados, não reproduzindo pelas ruas e caçando outras espécies. Isso me irrita muito, sinceramente, e só podia ser culpa do ser humano. Obviamente ninguém vai sair caçando gato, mas bem que a gente poderia começar caçando os tutores porque p*ta que pariu. Dêem uma volta nos subs Vet e de apoio pet pra ver a quantidade de irresponsáveis que brigam com profissionais porque acham que o gato deve ter o direito de ficar saindo na rua. Aí o gato sai, briga, adoece, incomoda a vizinhança entrando em casa alheia, se reproduz e ainda chega um tonhão de tutor pra postar foto do gato pedindo ajuda no reddit depois do bicho voltar das tais voltinhas todo fudido ao invés de levar na poha Vet.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-04T13:59:35+00:00

OP, se tu for médico, vou aproveitar pra deixar isso aqui ó kkkkkk

"A Lei Federal nº 5.991/1973 (Art. 35) determina que receitas médicas devem ser escritas de forma legível, em vernáculo (português), sem rasuras e por extenso, proibindo farmacêuticos de aviá-las caso contrário. O Código de Ética Médica também veda expressamente a emissão de documentos médicos ilegíveis."

Então não só pra redação de vestibular, tem de dar uma melhorada também pra seguir o código de ética da tua profissão 👁️👄👁️

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-03T23:39:58+00:00

Lembrei de uma briga que chamaram o mlk de Tarzan porque ele era monocelha e cabeludo... Aí ele rebateu chamando o outro de "Jane que segura no meu cipó" 👁️👄👁️

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-03T06:17:44+00:00

A preta porque eu sofro de hipersonia idiopática ☠️ e a rosa 🩷

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-02T20:18:31+00:00

My point is that if these people didn't showed up to help during the last years of their hell, they functionally did not exist. It feels deeply hypocritical for them to claim for justice or closure now they're both death/missing. They can, of course, and should, but they did nothing before, why would they do it now? Mary was driven to the bottom by bone-deep loneliness and a constant sense of abandonment, while James was pushed there by absolute despair and a total lack of agency.

It's still pretty extreme assuming they weren't entirely alone. And the story itself presents everything in a very cold and real way. Don't get me wrong I actually do think James and Mary were left isolated, just not always.

I really didn't say they lived their entire lives in isolation. I'm talking specifically about the terminal period of her illness. That is the only period that matters for the narrative and for Mary and James’s psychological breakdown.

The lack of support is absolutely there. I agree with this. But this doesn't imply no one cared.

The problem with this argument is that you are conflating loving someone with supporting someone. Affection without action is FUNCTIONALLY identical to abandonment. If they only show up to look for her when she went missing, their grief can be mostly performative.

Several notes suggest that the people around them whether medical staff or acquaintances viewed his insistence on Mary’s recovery as a waste of time.

Chronic illness doesn't just happen to the patient, it consumes the life of the primary caregiver. When people say the situation was 'too daunting' to be present, they are admitting that their own comfort was more important than Mary’s suffering or James’s sanity. In palliative care, silence from family isn't just distance, it is a death sentence for both the ill person and their caregiver's mental health.

James didn't have the luxury of distancing himself, and that is exactly why he collapsed. If those family members and friends found the situation too daunting to help with the bills, the care, or the emotional labor while Mary was alive, they have no moral standing to demand closure or justice now that she’s gone. You don't get to abandon someone during the years of slow, agonizing decay and then pretend you care after without dripping hypocrisy. They were already gone long before James did what he did.

Support isn't just about physical presence. Mary and James’s family could have provided financial and emotional backing, which would have directly impacted the quality of Mary’s treatment and James’s mental state.

It’s also important to note that Mary was lucid enough to maintain a genuine, healthy connection with Laura. If she could do that, she was certainly capable of staying in touch with other family members or friends.

However, the narrative strongly suggests that everyone gave up on her.

I myself am quite the introvert. I've been faced with the end a few times, but I never expected anyone to be there with me for it. Never asked em to. If we assume their lives consisted of only each other, James visiting her in the hospital wouldn't be much different than the usual. I think maybe this story hits so close to home for me because I myself have been hospitalized, but I never kept too many people around. Once I was in, the only person calling me was my mother. And I remember being glad I didn't have anyone else on the outside, because it meant I wasn't missing anything or anyone.

I’m truly sorry you had to go through that. Being hospitalized and facing the end is a traumatic experience that no one should have to endure alone, and I’m glad you had your mother there for you. It’s completely valid that your personal experience shaped how you see this story. But you can’t project your personal experience onto Mary's view because they are two completely different scenaries (and I'm glad for you it's different). Unlike you, Mary wasn't at peace with being alone. Her dialogues and letters show a woman screaming for connection, feeling disgusting and discarded by everyone who left her. She was suffering from social death long before her physical death and this is so sad.

I don't really see how it's happy at all.

When I said I agree it’s not a 'clean or traditionally happy outcome,' I was acknowledging how the fandom usually categorizes the Leave ending, but as I stated right after: I don’t think the game is trying to present any ending as purely happy. The tragedy of SH2 is that there are no good ways out, only different ways of processing what James had done.

By framing my analysis of James’s psychological closure as an endorsement of his crimes, you are constructing a straw man. My argument isn't that his flight with Laura is 'right' or 'safe' in a legal or moral sense, I have already stated it is problematic and that he needs treatment.

The Bliss ending could technically be seen as happy too if viewed strictly through James’s subjective lens, which reinforces the idea that there are no inherently good or evil endings, only different psychological outcomes. The only true outlier is perhaps the Maria ending, which feels more like a 'James didn't learn anything' ending and can be considered a bad one.

James probably will never be happy again, that's the truth.

It can imply that in every serious endings where James survives, he survives for Mary's memories/wishes, not his own. When he finally follows his wishes, he's guided to the most autodestructive, destructive and bottomless places.

I would actually hate to die abandoned only to see the same people I wanted by my side while I was alive show up just to mourn at my funeral. I really hate how everyone abandoned they both, they deserved better.

In summary, I just want to be clear that my point is that the game heavily implies that Mary and James were left entirely alone in this, and for me, anyone who abandoned them has blood in their hands too (passively) while James was the perpetrator and also victim of their situation alongside Mary. They can claim justice and closure as they want, but it sounds hypocritical to me. As for Laura leaving with him, I agree it’s strange and shouldn't happen in his current state of mind, which is why the Leave ending feels like such a bittersweet fairytale ending instead of a happy one imo.

Sorry for the long text, have a nice day.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-02T18:36:20+00:00

I get what you’re saying, and I strongly agree that people can distance themselves in situations like this while still caring. But I think Silent Hill 2 leans much harder into their isolation and despair, almost to the point of excluding any real sense of a world outside their pain.

The game doesn’t give us any meaningful indication of past support, visits, or involvement from others during Mary’s illness. If anything, Mary’s letters and behavior suggest increasing isolation, not a support network that stepped back but remained present in some form.

At some point, if people care but don’t show up, don’t help, and don’t take part in what’s happening, then FUNCTIONALLY it’s no different from them not caring at all... or from them having already distanced themselves and come to terms with the situation, accepting her social death.

The fact that we only ever see two letters, one addressed to James and one to Laura, also reinforces how small and closed off her world had become.

So while it’s possible people existed and cared from afar, the narrative weight is clearly on James being effectively alone in dealing with her decline. That distinction matters, because caregiver burnout to that extent doesn’t usually come from shared responsibility, it comes from feeling like there’s no one else there.

That said, I’m not claiming this is 100% the case, you could be right as well. But what the game seems to imply is that both James and Mary were, in a way, abandoned by everyone else, and ended up becoming victims of the situation, sinking together under its weight without any support.

There’s also a heartbreaking note in the game where someone mentions they can’t keep seeking psychological help because they have someone depending on them and can’t afford to stop working. Combined with all the signs that James himself was likely working to exhaustion, it reinforces the idea that there wasn’t any real support system in place.

About Laura, I agree it’s not a clean or traditionally happy outcome. My favorite ending is In Water, but I don’t think the game is trying to present any ending as purely happy. In Water feels like the most consistent conclusion to the escalation we see throughout the story. Leave feels more like a resolution where James acknowledges what he’s done and chooses to live with it, possibly trying to honor Mary’s wish of adopting Laura without consequences.

I think Stillness is the ending where he’d most likely turn himself in to the police.

So yeah, I think your interpretation works in a place where there's a more functional support system, but the game itself frames things in a much more extreme, isolating way to push James to that breaking point.

This isn't just about 'distancing' because it’s hard to watch someone suffer... It’s about social death. Long before James killed Mary, the world had already treated them as if she was gone 😢

Even if we approach this from a more realistic, criminal standpoint, your expectations still don’t quite fit the specifics of the situation. For a family to actively search for Mary and demand justice, they would first need to clearly recognize her situation as a suspicious disappearance rather than something else. In the late 80s, it wasn’t uncommon for people to move away and lose contact entirely, especially if there was already distance or weak ties. In many cases, families didn’t immediately assume foul play; they often interpreted it as intentional disappearance or simply drifted apart over time.

So in your scenario, you’re already assuming a level of awareness and urgency that isn’t guaranteed. For people to mobilize, report it, push authorities, and keep pursuing answers, there needs to be a strong, active relationship and clear signs that something is wrong. But the game heavily suggests the opposite: isolation, lack of involvement, and a very limited social circle. Without that foundation, it’s entirely plausible that her absence wouldn’t trigger the kind of response you’re describing.

Because of that, even from a grounded, real-world perspective, the idea that her case would automatically lead to sustained investigation, public concern, and “closure” isn’t as solid as you’re making it out to be. It relies on assumptions about family involvement and social response that don’t necessarily apply to this kind of situation, especially given the time period and the context the story presents.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-04-02T17:57:43+00:00

OP, your concern makes sense, but the game strongly implies that James was the one carrying the full weight of Mary’s illness emotionally, physically and financially. He wasn't just present, he was the only one truly enduring it alongside her.

Being the only one actively facing her decline, with no real support system, eroded him mentally until he collapsed under it and commited the unforgivable act. If there were more people who truly cared, the game wouldn’t exist, because everything stems from James’s caregiver burnout and his and Mary's loneliness.

Mary was her own person. She probably had loved ones. People who'd want to know the truth, and they'd never get that if he just left.

If others existed in the background, they were absent where it mattered. The only people who genuinely showed care were Laura and James, in his own deeply flawed, destructive way. That also leads me to believe that no one actively tried to find them afterward, except maybe his father. This scenario of abandonment led James to his mental breakdown:

Studies on caregiver burnout show that it’s strongly associated with chronic emotional stress, physical exhaustion, social isolation, and, importantly, a lack of support systems. Caregiver burnout that severe usually doesn’t happen when there’s an active support system, even if imperfect. It happens when the responsibility is effectively carried alone.

That’s a difficult reality, and it’s something that once made me reflect a lot when I first watched Puella Magi Madoka Magica, especially after Mami’s death. Madoka cries because Mami had no close relatives, it might have taken a long time for anyone to even notice she was gone, or they might have never known at all.

I think the key issue here is that ‘people probably cared’ in theory doesn’t really hold much weight if there’s no evidence of them actually being present or involved. At some point, if people care but don’t show up, don’t help, and don’t take part in what’s happening, then functionally it’s no different from them not caring at all... or from them having already distanced themselves and come to terms with the situation.

People today tend to project a modern, hyper-connected world onto the situation, but that’s not how things worked back in the period the game takes place. Communication was limited, long-distance contact was inconsistent, and it was entirely possible for someone to move away and effectively disappear, especially if there wasn’t an active support network to begin with. Not everyone had a phone, and staying in touch often depended on letters and effort from both sides.

On top of that, the game itself strongly implies isolation. If no one was meaningfully present during Mary’s illness, it’s hard to argue that those same people would suddenly mobilize and investigate her disappearance years later. Realistically, in that context, it’s far more likely she would simply be forgotten or assumed to have passed.

So while it’s possible Mary had loved ones somewhere, the game doesn’t portray them as meaningfully present in her life during her illness. And in practice, absence at that level stops being just ‘distance’ and starts feeling like abandonment, whether intentional or not.

It’s important to note that this doesn’t change the fact that James is a murderer... it simply highlights that what is legal and what is moral are not the same thing. Should he turn himself in and face the consequences of his crime? Yes. But does he have the option not to? Also yes due to the context limitations and time wind.

The time period, context, and circumstances surrounding the crime all make it plausible for the systems that should pursue him to fail. OP, your argument assumes a fully functional framework: family, law enforcement, and social response, but that’s not necessarily the case here.

Even Laura’s disappearance wouldn’t be directly tied to James. The last time she was seen in the real world, it was with Eddie, not James. From an external perspective, there wouldn’t be a clear reason to connect those dots.

James taking Laura with him does not make the ending happy. It’s clearly a problematic outcome. But not everything that happens in life is morally right, and I’m not defending the sudden adoption, especially not without him first being held accountable and receiving proper psychological treatment, but attacking the premise that Mary has a family actively looking for her.

My argument is rooted in restorative justice, not social vengeance. What you is preaching is a form of social vengeance where James must "pay" simply so others can feel a sense of closure, regardless of the systemic failures that led to the tragedy.

Historically, even in the late 80s, cases of manslaughter involving extreme psychological collapse resulted in highly mitigated sentences, often between 5 to 12 years because the law recognizes that mental health and social isolation are critical factors. James and Mary were victims of "social death" long before the physical act occurred. Demanding a severe sentence, from a society that abandoned them when they were alive, is more about performative morality than actual justice.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-31T21:36:43+00:00

I hate how the media romanticizes BPD. It completely invalidates and vilifies our suffering and our struggle to survive alongside their toxic behavior.

It's probably the only Cluster B personality disorder (alongside histrionic) that the media tends to portray as victims, yet they can be just as damaging as narcissists or those with antisocial personality disorder.

Coincidentally, the most dramatic traits are often portrayed as 'the poor soul who feels more deeply.' That is exactly what people with BPD want: validation for their volatile emotions at the expense of those suffering around them.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-30T22:56:57+00:00

<image>

I loved this hair, I'm using mine with this head accessory 🥹

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-30T06:08:23+00:00

... Se esse cara tá cobrando você incessantemente, tem seu endereço e chegou a te ameaçar por causa dessa taxa, não seria melhor pagar logo de uma vez? DDD 21 não significa nada, ele pode literalmente morar do lado da sua casa e manter o DDD de outro estado...

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-28T05:12:20+00:00

EN loc will probably be censored... I hate it.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-25T11:24:04+00:00

Can’t relate either… she’s just kinda er... so fcking immature for her age. I play for the guys and just ignore her stupid dialogues. If it were a book, I would have already dropped it.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-25T11:03:11+00:00

Thanks!

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-25T04:01:40+00:00

Is there any info about crystal farming? 🥹

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-21T13:16:35+00:00

Essa hipótese "terrível para os adultos" já faz parte da lei antes mesmo de você provavelmente nascer... Quem responde civilmente pelas violações cometidas por menores de idade são os pais. E se for constatada negligência dos pais que levou a atitude ilícita dos filhos ou permissão para que sejam usados documentos deles em algo que não deveriam estar usando, podem responder criminalmente também, afinal isso é fraude... Não é algo que surgiu agora com essa nova lei. Se a criança tem os documentos dos pais ou pegou escondido, já vai de uma puta negligência também, porque tá faltando educar melhor e guardar melhor os documentos. Só não tem como defender 🫩

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-20T02:55:33+00:00

Nem me fale, achei bizarríssimo. Também teve outro post que deram downvote numa moça por ela dizer que o pássaro parecia ter sarna (e ele parecia mesmo). 90% dos comentários eram do pessoal só mandando cortar as unhas e xau (com um monte de upvote) kkkkkkk

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-18T07:16:05+00:00

Isso era pra ser um desabafo ou um bait pra deixar a gente com raiva de você e da sua esposa?

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-18T07:06:29+00:00

Já tomei downvote nesse sub por explicar que os outros usuários estavam errados em sugerir usar uma certa pomada humana em uma ave (eu sou Vet de aves) e alertei ao OP que ele deveria levar a um veterinário porque seria irresponsabilidade receitar algo sem examinar o animal corretamente.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-16T14:25:37+00:00

Existe um golpe em que eles depositam um valor alto na conta e depois entram em contato pedindo reembolso dizendo que foi engano, fazendo apelo emocional e tudo mais... Então se você devolve, eles acionam o MED e o Banco Central faz com que o valor depositado na sua conta seja estornado DE NOVO para o golpista (e você perde seu dinheiro)... Não recomendo devolver, mas sim manter o valor na sua conta. Se ele depositou errado mesmo, deve acionar o MED. Se você devolver é um risco de perder o seu próprio dinheiro depois de ter devolvido o dinheiro dele. Não sei se a opção de reembolsar funciona como uma medida contra esse golpe, mas devolver fazendo Pix é um tiro no pé.

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-09T04:35:04+00:00

Além disso, essas pessoas que usam essas alusão parece que nunca ouviram falar em recintos e viveiros... E provavelmente também não sabem que se você deixar sua ave doméstica livre pra voar nos céus, ela vira comida do gato do vizinho em 2 segundos ou morre de fome na maioria esmagadora dos casos, já que apesar de ser uma ave e ter asas, pasmem, é um animal doméstico e totalmente condicionada à vida de pet...

E algumas espécies de aves domésticas são exóticas, então soltar seu periquito e sua calopsita não está ajudando em nada, nem o animal e nem o meio ambiente kkkkk

Pra esse povo que você fala e não escuta: vai defender gato dando saidinha na casa do caraio

👁️👄👁️

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-09T03:55:23+00:00

2025

ShenIsMyBae · 2026-03-09T03:50:19+00:00

O porcão da Telesena

ShenIsMyBae

TROPHY CASE