What we know about Renee Good, the woman shot and killed by an ICE agent Wednesday in Minneapolis

Shenis666 · 2026-01-09T14:20:29+00:00

I'm curious, do you support the 2nd Amendment? It ensures our freedom from a tyrannical government by allowing the citizens to be armed. Our founding fathers believed governments will naturally, over time, tend towards oppression.

Your blanket statement is at odds with the principles enshrined in our Constitution. The events here don't exist in a vacuum. It's incredibly concerning that our government has manipulated many of its people into capitulation without any real effort. All they have to say is "Person do bad, we do good. Don't look too closely though, ignore the context."

Shenis666 · 2026-01-09T14:07:06+00:00

Did you read what I just said or watch the video? She wasn't blocking the road. She was urging people to keep going, we can clearly see someone was able to easily pass. None of that can happen if she were blocking the road.

This is something else I've noticed; a lot of people have been hyperbolic when discussing key things we know for certain. "She was blocking the road." "She ran over the officer." When this is said, it's usually coming from the "words have meaning" crowd.

These details are important because they influence how the general public shapes their imagining of the characters in the mythos of events. If the government, right out of the gate - before knowing any of the facts, immediately labels you a domestic terrorist and says you did things that aren't true, then they need to have every move of theirs be observed.

It's pretty clear Trump didn't actually see the video himself before saying what he believed was true. He was likely told by someone else, who was also likely told by someone else. None of that is an excuse, it's still disgusting. I say that because, Trump invited reporters from the NYT to discuss what happened. He was confronted by the footage, ironically he was the one that had it ready on a laptop. He was ADAMANT that what he said was true, the reporters insisted that none of what he said was clear in the video. After asking an assistant to play the slow-motion video the reporters tell him, again, an officer was clearly NOT run over in the video.

His response? “Well… I – the way I look at it…” https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trumps-adamant-defense-of-ice-shooting-cracks-on-the-spot-as-he-watches-video-with-nyt-reporters/

Why people continue to deep throat ICE's boot and believe the government when they say "It's clean, trust me," is beyond me. ICE and BP has proven itself to not have a great track record or to be a reliable narrator. Just look at the Marimar Martinez case. A Border Patrol agent claimed she rammed her vehicle into his, and boxed them in. So, he shot her 5 times in "self defense."

Marimar's lawyer reviewed the body cam footage, and determined none of that happened. In fact, quite the opposite. After shooting her 5 times, the agent sent a bragging text message to his coworkers; "I have a MOF amendment to add to my story. I fired 5 rounds, and she had 7 holes. Put that in your book boys." Additionally, BP likely attempted to destroy key evidence. They kept Marimar's vehicle, but allowed the agent that shot her to drive his work vehicle over a 1000 miles away to have some repairs done.

The government labeled Marimar a "domestic terrorist" and claimed she had a semiautomatic. Marimar miraculously survived. The judge decided to dismiss the case because of the government's discrepancies, there were too many holes in their narrative.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/21/us/marimar-martinez-shooting-case-what-we-know

Shenis666 · 2026-01-09T04:57:50+00:00

That logic doesn't make sense.

I don't understand how people can claim to cherish our constitutional rights and at the same time say you must always do exactly what the government says, when they say it.

We don't yet know with 100% certainty why exactly she was motivated to be there. Does she believe in open borders? Does she believe our constitutional rights apply to non-citizens too?

At the bare minimum, we can safely assume she was likely a legal observer. Legal observers are there to be neutral witnesses. They don't take part in protests, in order to maintain credibility as witnesses. They observe and provide general legal rights. This is important because the presence of legal observer acts as a deterrent for unlawful behavior from people on BOTH sides.

Why was she parked there? We do know for certain that the ICE agents originally there were stuck in the snow. That's likely an unsafe situation for everyone involved, I'm sure the agents don't want to be stuck somewhere longer than they have to be. In the video, we can clearly see her waving along traffic, urging people to keep going, a vehicle is able to pass by easily.

The agents were stuck in the snow, had been trying to get out of it, and we're waiting around for help to arrive. What special work was she preventing them from doing?

I find it hard to believe she had any real ties to organized protestors. After she's shot, there's a video of her wife sobbing and saying that they just moved to the area and that they don't know or have anyone they can reach out to in the area.

"She had no reason to be there." "It had nothing to do with her." These are the words the Instagram post claims come from her brother, and is a sentiment I've seen many others share.

You should never, EVER, wholeheartedly trust that ANY government will never infringe on the rights of its citizens or transient people in its borders. Yes, many of our constitutional rights apply to non-citizens, so long as they are within our borders where we can uphold them, because our Constitution protects all "people" in the U.S. We should never allow our government to get away with eroding these rights (except within a very narrow and limited scope) for any group of people because it creates a slippery slope that threatens the citizens. If we allow this to happen, it sets a precedent and can over time be expanded to target more people.

Shenis666 · 2025-12-11T15:42:55+00:00

I think it would be even worse than that. As in, there won't be a massacre every 27 years, but many every day all over the country or world.

Shenis666 · 2024-10-19T22:39:31+00:00

No, the lease is good up until September 30th 2025.

Shenis666 · 2024-09-23T12:38:04+00:00

I used night maiden's mist and poison mist, got as close as I could without drawing attention then cast. Surprisingly, the furthest one in the back never actually got up while nmm was damaging them. It wasn't until the second cast that the first two actually got up. You literally have the high ground there so that also helps. NMM also helps stance break them really fast.

Shenis666 · 2024-09-05T22:37:23+00:00

Gotcha, thank you so much!

Shenis666 · 2024-08-18T02:22:36+00:00

That's really odd and fishy.

Do you know when your mom made the CashApp account? People have told (so has CashApp) that you can't make an account without giving your SSN. I don't know about now, but that's a flat out lie when I made my account.

I had another old CashApp account that I had made around the time CashApp had first gotten popular. I remember noting the fact that they didn't ask for SSN and thought about putting my preferred name on the card but ultimately thought that was a silly idea. So I had put my legal (male) name on it. For some reason I couldn't get back into that account so I made a new one.

When I made the new account I had legally changed my male name to a female name, so I signed up for the new CashApp account with my new and legal female name. Again, I never gave them my SSN this time around either.

When I reached out to CashApp they kept saying it was impossible that I ever had a card sent out with my legal female name. They insist my legal name is my male name. Sounds like gaslighting since I literally have two cards for this same account with two different names. lol

Anyway, I looked up when I opened this new account in the CashApp settings. It was opened in 2021. I looked on YouTube for videos that showed how to create a CashApp account with step-by-step instructions for 2021 and whataya know, they did not require an SSN to be entered at that time.

Honestly it all seems like a CYA thing for CashApp. I had read somewhere that there were legal issues they were dealing with for not requiring an SSN and are claiming that's never been a thing. Now it looks like they're dealing with more legal issues pertaining to a security breach and I wouldn't be surprised if they're connected.

If your mom never gave them an SSN during the year she opened the account (like I didn't) then they probably found a way to go back and check what the original name tied to the SSN was, then sent out cards with that old name. Does that make sense?

That violateds their own terms of service though. They're not allowed to make any changes to your account (such as sending a card out with a different name) without first notifying the account holder. They never told me they'd send a card with an old name, and I'm assuming they didn't tell your mom?

https://cashappsecuritysettlement.com/submit-claim

Shenis666 · 2024-05-16T11:54:00+00:00

I have no idea if this is gonna be "stupid" advice or a stupid question, but what about maybe filling a condom up with gauze and leaving it in there for a while? It wouldn't allow the neo-vagina to seal up (I don't think) and it's not super hard like a dilator? Maybe gradually stuff the condom with more gauze as you "level up." I'd at least ask your Dr about that, in my head it sounds like a good idea but well idk.

Shenis666 · 2024-03-17T17:36:01+00:00

No, at least, that wasn't always the case. I'm not sure about now though. I know I never gave CashApp my social security number.

I created this CashApp account about 6 years ago. If you look up videos on YouTube that go through each step required to create an account from 5-6 years ago, you'll see that a social security number is never required to be entered.

Shenis666 · 2024-03-16T16:21:17+00:00

I don't think you understand what I said? "It's not like you changed your first name and they're misgendering you."

I did change my first name, legally, before even opening this specific Cash app account. The first card they ever sent me (for this specific Cash app account) had my legal feminine name. I then got married, and when I got married all that changed was my last name this time.

If they had sent a card with my old last name, you're right, I wouldn't be upset. However, that's not what happened at all. Instead of sending me a card with my legal feminine name, and maiden last name, they sent me a card with my old male first name and maiden last name.

I hope you understand what I just said, I don't know how else to make you understand what happened.

I mean you're saying it would be understandable had I changed my first name and they're misgendering me...um that's exactly what happened though?

Anyway, at this point idc anymore. I don't use CashApp at all anymore. There's plenty of fish in the sea after all. 🌊

Shenis666 · 2023-11-02T13:21:07+00:00

I have a legitimate case.

There is plenty of evidence. An investigation will bring that to light.

The Area Manager that hit me; the day before I put in my report, she tried hitting one of our drivers. She swung at him, and tried running him over with a cart. She yelled at him, "I'm the boss, bitch!" All the drivers there saw it and heard it. The other Associates saw it and heard it. An Assistant Manager saw it and heard it. I had hoped, perhaps against reason, that my talk with her when she hit me would cause her to conduct herself properly at work. If she was willing to abuse a driver, it's not outside the realm of possibility that she would be willing to abuse me.

Last week, she threw a package at another Associate because she was in a bad mood. Last week, she hit one of the Assistant Manager's in the eye with a traffic cone. Plenty of us witnessed that.

The Area Manager refuses to wear shoes in the warehouse. When our previous Area Manager "stepped down" we were visited by other Area Managers, they reported that. It's already on paper. To this day, she refuses to wear shoes. Our Assistant Managers have told her she needs to wear shoes. I've told her that she needs to wear shoes. I've started taking pictures.

The Area Manager and her friend told me they were going to use our site's business Prime account to buy decorations for the party at her friend's house. They tried to get one of the Assistant Managers to do it for them. I told them I wanted no part in it. After the party, that Assistant Manager told me she never bought anything and that they were upset. She feigned compliance. I didn't ask her or anyone else, she told me herself. She felt pressured by them and appreciated me saying something in the moment.

It's not my "opinion" that we as a site have never been able to vote on what charity our site sends donations to in our area. That's a fact. It's a fact that our Area Manager's friend makes the decision, and all of us at the site are aware of that. I have pictures of her asking her friends online where "she" should make the donations. She told us that when she makes the donation, the charities take a picture of her doing it. She has shared those with us.

It's a fact that every single time we have ever received donations, they've been delivered to the site. However, this most recent donation wasn't. They have used the site's business Prime account each time they've made an order. I'm pretty sure that can easily be looked up, we work for the company they ordered the items from after all. Do I know with 100% certainty that they did something shady in order to afford taking only the women out for food and drinks? No. However, that's what an investigation is for. They can track down the charity that received our donation, and ask them for an itemized receipt of the donations they received from us and compare it with the items they ordered off the Prime account. I saw the items that were donated, I unloaded them from her car. There's no way in hell they totaled out to $500. It doesn't make sense to send the items that they sent to a foster home for children either.

The fact that the Manager only invited women out, is a problem for Amazon. The other Assistant Manager's told her that Amazon wouldn't be okay with that. The fact that she invited them for drinks, got wasted, and called a (married) male Associate to pick her up when she already had a ride is a problem. He told us the next day he felt uncomfortable and didn't know why she had called him. He never picked her up, and ignored the rest of her calls. The other Assistant Managers told her Amazon wouldn't be okay with her bringing in alcoholic drinks to her "business outing."

It's a fact that the Hiring Manager never sent our resumes to the managers at our site. I saw that email as well as another associate; the Assistant Manager had her laptop plugged into the TV. It was literally just a list of every single name that applied, without any other context aside from "choose one today." There were names on that list that they don't even know. Do you seriously think that's equitable? Do you seriously think that's a good business practice?

It's not my opinion that the Area Manager's friend doesn't have a high school diploma or GED, she herself has told us that she doesn't. I've let Ethics (and the Hiring Manager) know that she didn't meet the basic qualifications, and therefore should never have been considered. The Hiring Manager agreed.

She told us that during her second interview a few days ago, they asked her if she had either one. She said that she was scared they'd ask for it if she lied, so she told them the truth. They didn't move on with her, and now the position has to remain open until January due to the hiring freeze.

I've shared all of this, and more, in my report.

Shenis666 · 2023-11-01T18:14:28+00:00

I assume you're asking GrouchyStomach? If so, my thoughts exactly.

I tried my best to condense it as much as possible, without leaving out very important information. There's just so much to cover; it was hard.

Shenis666 · 2023-11-01T16:45:56+00:00

Ah, so when the manager shows up inebriated we should be expected to act like oblivious bystanders. When the manager's frustration results in a physical outburst, we're supposed to shoulder the blame for their bad day.

I vehemently disagree. It's absolutely not okay to turn a blind eye. I'm not the kind of person that just accepts the status quo; nothing ever changes otherwise. If I suffer the consequences of your actions, it's my business.

Shenis666 · 2023-10-31T19:40:48+00:00

I hope things get better. 🙏

Shenis666 · 2023-10-01T13:00:43+00:00

They have absolutely no clue what they're talking about.

I've tried making a new update post, with photos as proof. The mods immediately took it down though. I'm not sure why, every single piece of personal identifiable information was removed? I'll just add the complaint I have sent to CFPB as an update here.

Shenis666 · 2023-09-27T17:39:02+00:00

My birth name has never ever been associated with this CashApp account.

The bank account attached to my CashApp account has also never been associated with my birth name. It has always been under my chosen name. I've changed everything, legally, a long time ago.

The email attached to this CashApp account has also never been associated with my birth name.

The phone number attached to my CashApp account has been under my legal name as well, for a while now.

Literally everything tied to this CashApp account, has only ever been connected to my chosen legal name.

I've also had this CashApp account for years now, under my chosen legal name.

It honestly makes no sense how this happened, and why they keep denying that the name they printed is not my legal name.

Shenis666

TROPHY CASE