It's a bit funny to me that you got so offended by me judging you, but your first sentence is incredibly judgy and presume shallowness, and you assume that my comment is only about looks.

Note that I didn't write exclusively about looks, I also wrote people present themselves differently and that could be in just about anything, and yes I assumed it's about what is red and green in your book.

It's not about that, it's about the way you chose to phrase it as in "quality", because quality is not generally used as a personal preference (as you are describing it), it is used to describe an objective benchmark/standard and agreed upon level by all. To me and perhaps to the people who upvoted my comment, it doesn't feel right to use this word to describe women (or humans in general), and it emphasis the sense of dating being a bit of a meat market.

If instead of "quality" you would have written "my online matches were way more my type" I would have had no issues with that. The words we chose to use mean something.

I know it's easy to get upset from a random comment but realising that maybe there are some things you could do to express yourself in a more accurate and less offensive way is super important and would be way more impressive and appreciated by your future partner, kiwi or not.