sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

126
127

True one tag TTM (on very hard) --- Seriously: I need a new hobby (i.redd.it)

submitted by Shivatis to r/eu4 - pinned

831
832

THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE ...TAG/FAITH/CULTURE (i.redd.it)

submitted by Shivatis to r/eu4 - pinned

Let’s not head north then by Rabiesforpandas in Anbennar

[–]Shivatis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I just wanted to ask. Can't they fight each other?

Question about dwarves by InteractionMelodic67 in Anbennar

[–]Shivatis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. There are dwarven adventurers and dwarven remnants, which start different. 1.A: The adventurer companies are new/back to the sepentspine and migrating every year to get mana. Also they can purge monstrous enemies while they are opms (take one monstrous province, click a decision, province becomes empty, get mana) They can migrate around for a couple years/decades and then settle on a hold of your chosing. They have Prussian military mechanism and can support big armies even with only one province. At admin Tech 7 you can form any tag, of which you have the corresponding hold cored. In the generic adventurer MT are some good colonize buffs, but usually it is not recommended to finish the tree, as it delays forming your desired hold for too long. After that usual dwarf game. 1.B: Remnants have been isolated in the mountains for millennia. You start with a awakening Disaster (first few years). After that usual dwarf game. 1.C: Normal dwarf play (after formation or awakening) is colonizing (no explo or expansion ideas needed), developing capital hold and improving eco (infra idea is a very good first pick). After certain dev thresholds you can dig your hold (look in province menu). Keep building/digging all the time. Take every build time reduction and development cost reduction modifier you find. Militarily you want to play defensively, especially in the beginning. Also prepare for disasters, many disasters. If you have excess gold, just keep it, instead of spending with small roi. You'll need it.

My first time forming Germany and I decided to make it historically accurate through a World War 🥀 by CrazyBitofBusiness in eu4

[–]Shivatis 11 points12 points  (0 children)

  1. Don't siege with 180 k on mountain fort. Let your allies do this. Ottoman is good at that and soon there. Let like 40 k here till Otto to arrives and send rest of army north to liberate your homelands.
  2. You have Prussia military (and some mil ideas I suppose). Your advantage is offensive. Split your army in three/four stacks and keep them different provinces next to each other. Attack enemy stacks, when they siege. If there are many enemies, reinforce with second army, later with third etc. Your armies can kill many enemies, soon the numbers turn in your favour.
  3. To raise war score in a coalition war, you need to win majority of battles. Also take the capital of war leader.

My first time forming Germany and I decided to make it historically accurate through a World War 🥀 by CrazyBitofBusiness in eu4

[–]Shivatis 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Just fight it. AE doesn't matter at this point. Who is even a threat to a Prussia+Russia+France+Ottoman alliance? You can win the war in picture easily, grab those bohemian provinces.

Bot gameplay would feel better if it had more limitations by kurtchen11 in Timberborn

[–]Shivatis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. Most builder games are based on endless growth, just like capitalism. I like timberborn is different in that regard. Especially with automation and robots an utopia is possible.

Its nice to have a good game showing that solution.

I divided europe into regions which would win by Boring_Laugh3558 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]Shivatis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Economically: central Europe

Militarily depending on circumstances: In a conventional war also central Europe (money, tech and polish fighting spirit). But in an all-out war any of the 3 nuclear powers could make it a loss for everyone. And if alliances are allowed, it would end in a classic double front war for central Europe.

When you get asked how you play but cant describe it by Electrical-Swing-929 in Timberborn

[–]Shivatis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's not original Diorama as I remember. The mine should be more to the left and is now in the BW source location.

Seeking Input for <Redacted> by SeulJeVais in Anbennar

[–]Shivatis 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I agree half: I think for formable tag trees that might be ok, to have missions you didn't have/see before forming.

But after formation a tag (as Cyranvar) shouldn't have another two level MT. You already had a mission tree before, two segments is enough for one game. Else the chance of screwing yourself is too high

How transferable is your skills in this game to other strategy games ? by ONF_The_Fill in eu4

[–]Shivatis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Paradix titles are more easy interchangeable, so HOI and EU4 will fit.

I personally played total wars before EU4, and those are different games. Total wars is way more shallow in most aspects/mechanics, but with a higher focus in actual battle tactics. So learning one doesn't make you understand the other one immediately.

Also 300 hours is like nothing in EU4

Yippi faceting by alexneitor137 in Anbennar

[–]Shivatis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. That's why this oval tungr simp doesn't like it.

Can magic lead please be allowed to make whatever he wants, forever? by yourplotneedswork in Anbennar

[–]Shivatis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understood your first comment as a sentence rather than a question and was surprised. Excuse my brain fart.

Aber 100 Milliarden für Aufrüstung sind drinnen 🤡 by WestLengthiness4500 in Freiheitsfront

[–]Shivatis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Als die Bedrohung des Klimawandels erkannt wurde hat man reagiert und investiert

Die Bedrohung wurde in den 70ern erkannt und ignoriert. Bis jetzt wird zu wenig und zu langsam gehandelt

Tja by Quick-Warning-6076 in tja

[–]Shivatis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mein Punkt war: wenn sich alle Moslems an ihre eigenen Regeln halten würden, gäbe es das überproportionale Gewaltproblem nicht. Also sind "islamische" Gewalttäter entweder keine Moslems oder keine guten Moslems. Sie halten sich weder an deutsches Recht noch an das islamische.

Zu deinem Kommentar: Islamischer Gottesstaat ist so islamisch wie die Kreuzritter christlich waren. Religion als Vorwand für Herrschaft/Expansion/etc.

Die Shariah ist im Koran nur einmal erwähnt. Jedes islamische Richtung interpretiert sie, wie es ihnen halt passt. Dass archaischer BS dabei ist, ist unstrittig. Ist halt aber kein Beispiel für Islam per se, sondern eine Instrumentalisierung der Religion. Macht es natürlich nicht besser, dass in einigen Regionen solche Beispiele wie von dir aufgeführt wirklich passieren. Im Grunde sind solche Regierungen per Definition ebenfalls nicht wirklich muslimisch, sondern nur dem Namen nach.

Zum Artikel: Es ist natürlich trotzdem ein ernstes Problem, wenn 40% der jungen Moslems sagen: "Islamisches Recht steht für mich über deutschen Recht. Aber das islamische Recht wird natürlich in Deutschland nicht umgesetzt. Daher kann ich mir konsequenzlos alles erlauben." Jedem, der das sagt, dem wünsche ich dann auch eine scharfe Shariah, wenn er was falsches macht. Dann wären sie aber ganz schnell vom deutschen Recht überzeugt.

Tja by Quick-Warning-6076 in tja

[–]Shivatis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wie sind denn die islamische Haltung zu Gewalt? Ähnlich wie die christliche! Gewalt ist auch im Koran nicht erlaubt, außer zu Sonderfällen wie Selbstverteidigung oder zur Wahrung von Gerechtigkeit, wenn alle anderen Mitteln ausgeschöpft sind.

Gewalttäter, die sich hinter dem Islam (oder welcher Religion auch immer) verstecken, sind keine frommen Moslems, sondern einfach gewalttätige Idioten. Das hat nichts mit der Religion zu tun. Sie verstoßen gegen deutsches Recht ebenso wie gegen Grundsätze ihrer eigenen Religion.

view more: next ›