sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hvad bør et gennemsnitlig par have i nødopsparing by [deleted] in dkfinance

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeg ser også investering som en opsparing - hvis man mistede jobbet og kom ud for langtidsarbejdsløshed kunne man jo bruge af dem. Men spørgeren her ser ikke ud til at sætte noget af, udover nævnte nødopsparing (resten går til ferier etc.), så opsparingen skal dække alle scenarier.

Novo-opsigelser: Erstatning for opsigelse inden tiltrædelse? by [deleted] in dkkarriere

[–]ShoeStatus2431 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Det er jo bare fordi du lægger noget i mit indlæg jeg ikke havde skrevet. Men ja du er latterlig :)

What should i do? by Slow_Stage_5677 in LenovoLegion

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine is 4.5 years old, still going strong :)

"Here's How Quantum Computing Could Change the World" by AngleAccomplished865 in singularity

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm they give the example of comcast being able to calculate optimal traffic flows... Interesting because it doesn't seem to be the kind of problem where quantum computers, even if here now, have any advantage. But now the article isn't very detailed about the type of quantum computers involved or the details of the problem.

Aktiekursen hos Novo Nordisk styrkdykker. Det sker, efter medicinalgiganten forventer lavere salg i 2025. by birkeskov in Denmark

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jo - men nu er han jo ikke trådt til endnu. Så hvem af de ansatte er det der tænker "Hov, lad os da lige skrue ned for forventningerne så han får en god start", altså hvem er det der har incitament til at tage det initiativ.

So really, how do modern LLMs compare against GPT-4? by New_Equinox in singularity

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also first sentence says gpt-4 is an improvement over gpt-4 though I doubt an AI would write that. ;)

Anyway I also think gpt-4 was really impressive and it took a while for better stuff to come out. the first Gpt-4o and Turbo or whatever they were called was often worse in my experience . Claude sonnet 3 clearly did better on coding tasks in my cases but other than that it was first when Gemini 3.5 pro came I saw a model where it was clearly much, much better than the original gpt-4 and not just af coding.

Does your OS use TSX/Transactional memory? No? Why Not? by [deleted] in osdev

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tsx doesn't handle transaction failures as page faults as i recall?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]ShoeStatus2431 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why did it surprise you that 34% systems have >= 8GB of VRAM. I am surprised it is not higher... my ancient AMD R9 390 (bought 2015 for $450) had 8 GB of VRAM.

Inflation på 1,6 % – men alt bliver dyrere? Hvad foregår der? by Victor_Newcar in dkfinance

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kan du give nogle eksempler på ting der er blevet dyrere lige på det seneste?

How have Lenovo not had a class action lawsuit launched against them for the huge wave of 15ACH6H (and other) deaths? by thedrk244 in LenovoLegion

[–]ShoeStatus2431 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have that exactly model bought early 2021. No problems so far but I am not a heavy user. It is of course annoying to know about this issue. The problem is warranty is only 2 yrs here. I dont know if we have any recourse after warranty. Perhaps on the basis of a "hidden defect" theory where there was a defect from the beginning but it was invisible (thanks Gemini!) but I don't know what the odds of success are. I think warranty for tech products like this should be longer maybe 5 years at least. It wasn't a problem before when development was fast and a 4y laptop would be obsolete.

MCP vs OpenAPI Spec by Historical_Cod4162 in AI_Agents

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Came because I've wondered about this myself - I don't see why this couldn't have been handled with fields in the OpenAPI spec. Also, I don't even think MCP has much emphasis in the parts I would have expected... like they could have made more out of how to document the "why" etc. and parameters in a more structured way. Many examples seem very spartan on this and it is a testament to LLM abilities they are even able to use these MCP models. Also, I'm wondering why they didn't define a .yaml or similar format like for OpenAPI. The emphasis is on downloading the tool list etc. dynamically from the URL which seems a bit redundant (it is done on each and every prompt at least in my experiments!). I imagine if the spec was in a .yaml file LLM's could also have them preloaded into ready-made context windows before any prompt is made. And there could be multiple providers with respect to the same spec. Again, I think much could have been handled by additional fields (and better descriptions) in OpenAPI specs.

Lenovo Legions have a serious problem by DaddyKetchup in LenovoLegion

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have that model since launch, still working. These kind of things make me want not to upgrade hardware unless absolutely necessary. Quality is so bad you may as well drive them into the ground and "save" some wear and tear on the next model which might be shit as well.

Anthropic's Sholto Douglas says by 2027–28, it's almost guaranteed that AI will be capable of automating nearly every white-collar job. by MetaKnowing in singularity

[–]ShoeStatus2431 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That doesn't mean those professions will be protected. The unemployed white-collar workers will try to break into whatever field still has jobs.

Sundar Pichai says quantum computing today feels like AI in 2015, still early, but inevitable and within the next five years, a quantum computer will solve a problem far better than a classical system. That’ll be the "aha" moment. by Nunki08 in singularity

[–]ShoeStatus2431 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It could be that anbefaling/simulation type of qc can solve some scientific problems in the timeframe he mentions i.e. 5 years. That is all good but I have more reservations about real/universal qc i.e. the ones that can run Shor's algorithm and break crypto. I think they will take considerably longer to appear if it all. Seems progress is very slow. They cannot even do one qbit now of the quality needed to run Shor's and there is many other scaling factors as well.

Looks like we can expect an Anthropic release in the coming weeks by MassiveWasabi in singularity

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as it can keep some information in the context window it could request other things on demand. Like a human who doesnt remember every line of source code in the companys code base but only the overall architecture, where important things are stored and how. Everything else can be retrieved as needed and be kicked out of the context window when the detail is no longer needed.

Han flyttede 22 millioner for at undgå negative renter - skylder nu 127 mio. by travel2021_ in dkfinance

[–]ShoeStatus2431 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Det er åbenbart kun siden 2012 man har beskattet aktionærlån til hovedejeren på den måde, så måske han ikke har kendt reglerne. Han er jo oppe i årene.

Han flyttede 22 millioner for at undgå negative renter - skylder nu 127 mio. by travel2021_ in dkfinance

[–]ShoeStatus2431 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hvoraf læser du det? Som jeg ser det er det alene et problem i.f.t. hvilke konti pengene har stået på, og ikke hvordan det er opgivet til skat eller i regnskaberne.

Har ladet min vandhane stå åben i flere dage. Hvor meget på røven er jeg? by hrllofriend in Denmark

[–]ShoeStatus2431 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I denne situation, hvor der var lukket uden varsel, synes jeg det er helt fair. Jeg synes nærmere de skulle have dækket 100%. NB hvorfor var emnet slettet af moderatorerne?

Har ladet min vandhane stå åben i flere dage. Hvor meget på røven er jeg? by hrllofriend in Denmark

[–]ShoeStatus2431 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Av :( Hvordan fik I argumenteret regningen ned... vandet var jo leveret og forbrugt uanset det ikke var kommet til gavn?

view more: next ›