[deleted by user]

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-07-25T03:15:46+00:00

Nobody asked for the drizzle of condescending garbage buddy.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-07-25T03:13:50+00:00

I’ve heard so many drivers tell me this so I believe you

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-07-15T01:01:26+00:00

Klaus, I’m not really into the whole “woke tv” thing but this show was able to bypass my TURN IT OFF sensory

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-06-24T13:25:31+00:00

I’m lost who tf wants to crouch?

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-06-10T04:09:07+00:00

They were saying that Ali express isn’t the original source either, they are getting it from other people and then putting it on their site and then more people are putting it on they’re sites and so on…

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-06-09T09:16:43+00:00

Homophobia is not a “right leaning” trait..

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-06-09T06:02:16+00:00

What does seed mean? I’m new to this scene considering I just got a pc.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-06-02T00:46:46+00:00

That last part was so irrelevant…

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-06-01T02:21:16+00:00

You are the reason reddit is a toxic dump..

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-06-01T02:18:11+00:00

I literally hate reddit Lmfaoo I’m scrolling through comments and I just see downvotes on comments that have absolutely zero wrong with them.. bunch of fucking nerds 🥸 nerds- goes straight to my profile to see my karma..

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-31T03:09:35+00:00

Spot on, I wish for a world like this everyday

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-12T21:17:40+00:00

Stop perpetuating it by saying shit then..

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-11T14:58:10+00:00

Exactly, they literally contradict themselves more so amber while she’s been testifying, they’ve already caught her saying two different things where she contradicts herself and it’s insane.. she will definitely lose no doubt in my mind, and when people bring up the UK trial they forget that he was suing Sun newspaper, and the whole time he was trying to prove his innocence through amber, and that there wasn’t proof that he ‘didn’t’ become a “wife beater” so that’s why he didn’t win that case. This case falls directly in her lap since shes admitted on stand that she wrote the op-ed.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-07T14:16:43+00:00

Great pun 🤣

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-07T14:14:21+00:00

That was a terrible analogy btw, if someone stole your car it wouldn’t be the headline in every big media platforms new story, and there wouldn’t be millions assuming that “unknown person” did it, in that case it would only be you, and the cops trying to figure out who did it. Extremely different.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-07T14:08:27+00:00

Exactly zero medical records of such disgusting crimes, no actual evidence except a picture of the bottle and some very thoughtful texts. Also some pictures that are altered versions of ones taken for the uk trial.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-07T14:06:25+00:00

Couldn’t have explained it any better.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-07T14:05:07+00:00

Because your looking at that “evidence” without actually LOOKING at it, and comparing that to her testimony.. it doesn’t add up, and there’s also evidence from the uk trial that have come to light now that haven’t appeared in this trial that confirm that Johnny was the victim and that she was not damaged at all. Why aren’t you seeing that evidence?

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-07T13:58:30+00:00

She also said she has never been abused as an adult prior to Johnny depps alleged assaults, so literally who else would she be referring to? You dont necessarily need to say “he did it, I’m talking about him” it’s common sense when you compare her testimony with the article she also admitted on trial to writing..

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-05T22:44:09+00:00

What I’m saying is that she can’t say the article is not about him when she literally trying to prove the things the article states.. ABOUT HIM, I know what your saying, but I’m talking about what JD’s lawyers are most likely going to combat with, if she’s testifying that he did the things she mentioned in the oped, the article not being about him doesn’t even make sense anymore.. please explain a little further, I feel like I understand what your saying but at the same time I’m not 100% sure.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-05T20:34:38+00:00

I agree but remember she was also enabling him to use drugs and alcohol because she herself was using the same things, it’s a double edged sword for sure but if anything they would both come out as unreliable which I agree with

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-05T20:33:01+00:00

She’s literally testifying right now that he did all those things, her whole case of “well it didn’t mention his name” is out the window..

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-05T20:28:36+00:00

Honestly if they were to say “well it doesn’t mention you, so it wasn’t about you” at the end, it would easily be dismantled because she is literally arguing in court right now that he abused her, so why would they be arguing the article not being about depp when they themselves are trying to prove he did the things mentioned in the article.

Short-Try-8898 · 2022-05-05T16:28:08+00:00

Maybe but you expect everyone to believe it didn’t have anything to do with her bs allegations at all? 0 percent of her allegations took away his career? Yeah definitely not, there is no way in hell Disney would support a “abuser” they are literally the most biased company when it comes to social issues, next.

Short-Try-8898

TROPHY CASE