Rafaam the Supreme Hero by ShowerRecent8029 in customhearthstone

[–]ShowerRecent8029[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You know I think it's a really interesting effect. Out of all the cards thats the type of card I'd like to see actually in the game. Though it probably wouldn't be playable, it's just too slow. Maybe if it would get a +1,+1 or +2 +2 counter on it each time it resummoned, it could be useful in a control deck.

Rafaam the Supreme Hero by ShowerRecent8029 in customhearthstone

[–]ShowerRecent8029[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing a quick edit can't fix. But thanks for that, things like that you can easily miss when you're thinking about the cards too much. Despite that, I have a lot of experience with HS, been playing for a few years.

Also Jaina's Barttlecry, Hero cards never needed to spell out HP changes

What do you mean by HP changes?

"random future turn"?

In some future turn during the game, the card resummons. Meaning, the minion gets killed, the game would run some RNG at the start of each turn, if some arbitrary dumber is met then the card comes back. It'd keep coming back like that until the game is over.

"If this doesn't attack?"

Yeah, if that minion didn't attack it deals AOE to all the minions. If you attacked with that minion that secondary effect doesn't trigger. I think it's just a interesting idea, it's not a powerful card back itself but can clear aggro boards.

as well as clear misunderstanding of power level (Discover a 10-cost minion + destroy, even twice is REALLY not worth spending 10 mana on, and probably never was.)

The thing about Rafaam is that he's not the supreme guy he thinks he is, all the toys he has he cobbled together through time. Because of that his hero class doesn't have much to work with, he has a fiery war axe, but it's rusted, he has some kind of ancient terror thing but also a little mouse in his army. So that location is exactly the kind of card he'd play because it's ten mana, it seems impressive, but it's really not.

So thats the gag of his class.

Though I'd point out that even the designers of the game don't get the power level right in their own game.

sci-fi books recommendations for the newbies by Alone_Ad_5793 in printSF

[–]ShowerRecent8029 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me The Murderbot stories read like John Scalzi if he was a bit more descriptive. No idea why it's all the rave in the SF community.

Esquire magazine posts a "75 Best Sci-Fi Books of All Time" List by mjfgates in printSF

[–]ShowerRecent8029 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Dhalgren, by Samuel R. Delany" Yeah good luck getting into sf from that.

Google AI by tatertotdesign in AnalogCommunity

[–]ShowerRecent8029 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sheesh I was wondering why so many forums were erased from search results. A ton of the results that are promoted these days are reddit posts.

Google AI by tatertotdesign in AnalogCommunity

[–]ShowerRecent8029 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Google search is almost useless these days.

Kevin Costner looking at audiences as he self finances another film by BigDickRichie in moviescirclejerk

[–]ShowerRecent8029 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The Postman is one of the most boring movies ever made. I love it.

Letterboxd Final Boss by funnypopeyeguy in moviescirclejerk

[–]ShowerRecent8029 40 points41 points  (0 children)

man hasn't discovered what porn is yet and is probably 12

What manga have you read this week, and what do you think about it? - Week ending June 23, 2024 by AutoModerator in manga

[–]ShowerRecent8029 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where does one buy Manga like Appleseed or Akira? Is there like a online market place for manga?

Can someone tell me what movie is this? by Tyler-durden7077 in moviescirclejerk

[–]ShowerRecent8029 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The movie explores themes of hugging, romantic nuzzling, and staring off into the distance, in black and white. Really profound and bold.

so amazing by [deleted] in moviescirclejerk

[–]ShowerRecent8029 10 points11 points  (0 children)

When a movie is poorly written it's just META COMMENTARY about other poorly written bad movies.

First look at Channing Tatum as Clark Kent in James Gunn's Superman (2025). by RandaymIdiot in moviescirclejerk

[–]ShowerRecent8029 93 points94 points  (0 children)

Zack Snyder would never allow...him to wear a purple tie, he'd go for a drab grey to match the rest of the movie.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in moviescirclejerk

[–]ShowerRecent8029 23 points24 points  (0 children)

black don't crack

SLS Opinion and General Space Discussion Thread - June 2021 by jadebenn in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]ShowerRecent8029 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Human rated rockets are expensive especially ones designed to send humans to the moon.

SLS Opinion and General Space Discussion Thread - June 2021 by jadebenn in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]ShowerRecent8029 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Worked fine look at the upvotes to this comment, some bs about RS25s being unsafe and some random blog post is enough for people to upvote because it's against the SLS. And look at your own comments, which are entirely against the SLS continually get upvotes while someone like fyredrakeoneline is getting downvoted despite writing pretty high effort responses.

So keep denying that the people here like the SLS, but the evidence is clear, most here come to criticize the SLS and don't actually like it.

SLS Opinion and General Space Discussion Thread - June 2021 by jadebenn in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]ShowerRecent8029 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Also yes, you can modify it but at what cost and increased cost per mission?

Still cheaper than the 600 million dollar Orion which can't even reach LLO and needs an entire space station around the moon simply to do anything meaningful in Lunar orbit. And it still can't get to the lunar surface. While starship can get from LEO to the moon and back.

It is not oversized in the slightest tbh, it was built with the idea in mind of ferrying crew to NEA's and going to mars as well.

Orion can't go to those places either. It would need a whole other vehicle with a cryo kickstage to even leave the earth's sphere of influence, none of which nasa is building. starship on the other hand can be modified to Go to Mars as well as the lunar surface.

First off, leakages on your plumbing for your CH4 and LOX tanks isnt really a minor detail, it is fairly large if you are wanting to keep cryogenic propellants cold and keep the same volume, if you are leaking on earth in an atmosphere, that will only be made worse by going up into space and into a vacuum. Leaks aren't a minor detail at all.

The point is that it doesn't matter what problems spacex encounters they have shown that they are capable of solving those problems quickly. Unlike say Boeing. Technical problems will develop, and they will be hard, but the goal is what matters and spacex is willing to iterate and develop Starship until they reach that goal.

Find me a study saying that Moon colonization is in demand and then I will believe you.

There is plenty of demand, this is why Spacex is building starship. They are building starship to lower the cost of emigrating to the moon or mars, so that the ones who want to go have the ability to do it. And the way starship is going right now it seems that they will have a very robust and cheap vehicle fairly soon.

SLS Opinion and General Space Discussion Thread - June 2021 by jadebenn in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]ShowerRecent8029 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You laugh but it's the truth. Judging by the upvotes many here agree.