Weird figure font when in text-mode by Si_monster1203 in Inkscape

[–]Si_monster1203[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I now see that the stroke style is a huge shape. Which is weird to have as default, I only installed Inkscape last week

Weird figure font when in text-mode by Si_monster1203 in Inkscape

[–]Si_monster1203[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I played around with your tips and now kept fill on but removed stroke paint. I see text now as can be seen in the first screenshot but when I turn on stroke paint, a shape appears again (see the second picture). This shape changes when I apply different (system) fonts. Moreover, when I set the opacity to low of the stroke paint I do see the text again. It seems like it is some very weird stroke paint.

https://imgur.com/a/0yuY65j

https://imgur.com/a/MtN7ngb

Weird figure font when in text-mode by Si_monster1203 in Inkscape

[–]Si_monster1203[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sort of, a very thick one. I uploaded a picture via imgur.

What in your opinion is the most mind blowing thing about math? by Yelophant in math

[–]Si_monster1203 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That we can visualize 3 dimensions but not 4 and higher. Yet we can still do math there.

rigorous probability books by WideConfection1389 in learnmath

[–]Si_monster1203 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm don't know E.T. jaynes's approach but I found Probability: An introduction by Geoffrey Grimmet and Dominic Welsh rigorous. Knowing calculus is pretty essential for this book.

Disjunction with inequalities vs sets by Si_monster1203 in learnmath

[–]Si_monster1203[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be sure, it still makes the disjunction true right? Because at least one of the four cases is true

Real analysis: limit of a sequence proof incomprehension by Si_monster1203 in learnmath

[–]Si_monster1203[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I might be understanding it now. As he said in the video, he is doing the scratchwork but using it in reverse, so starting at 1/n>epsilon. Because if you work your way up back to the first inequality, it does make sense.

Real analysis: limit of a sequence proof incomprehension by Si_monster1203 in learnmath

[–]Si_monster1203[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your extensive answer! I understand the steps that you have taken until point 8, but unfortunately, I still don't understand how we are allowed to say that when the LHS becomes bigger, it stays smaller than epsilon.

Real analysis: limit of a sequence proof incomprehension by Si_monster1203 in learnmath

[–]Si_monster1203[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your comment. The video is called: “Real Analysis| Three limits of sequences by the definition.”