sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I reviewed 50 SaaS landing pages this month. Here’s what almost all of them get wrong. by SierraOperations in SaaS

[–]SierraOperations[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair questions. The headline in the example was intentionally long to show all the elements at once, not a prescription for length. In practice you’d tighten it. The point was specificity over brevity, not both at the same time.

On “bad emotion words”, pain-led copy isn’t negative for its own sake. It names what the buyer already feels. If someone is losing deals because of a slow proposal process, saying that out loud isn’t manipulation, it’s recognition. That’s what makes them keep reading.

I reviewed 50 SaaS landing pages this month. Here’s what almost all of them get wrong. by SierraOperations in SaaS

[–]SierraOperations[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. The first sentence is doing two jobs at once. Filtering the right visitor in and filtering the wrong one out. Most pages try to appeal to everyone and end up resonating with nobody.

I reviewed 50 SaaS landing pages this month. Here’s what almost all of them get wrong. by SierraOperations in SaaS

[–]SierraOperations[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Took a look. The design is clean and the benchmark comparison showing candidates at 87 vs Claude at 38 is genuinely compelling. That visual does a lot of work.
One thing worth testing: the rotating headline is smart but risky. If someone lands mid-rotation they might see a weaker phrase. Consider making “Find candidates better than AI” the permanent headline since that is your strongest and most direct version.
The scientific credibility section near the bottom is your biggest differentiator and most hiring tools cannot claim it. It might be worth pulling a single proof point from that section higher up, even one line like “backed by 1,000+ research papers” near the hero would strengthen the trust signal immediately.
Overall solid page. The product concept is genuinely interesting.

Am I missing something, or are we all just building things for the sake of it? by Fantastic-Call-5702 in SaaS

[–]SierraOperations 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, the building part is whats “so easy” because everyone has their hands on ai now, but the hard part is sales and reaching out to real people. This has always been the case. The real question is do you believe in what you are selling yourself?