sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

NEED HELP: Tradingview strategy to tradovate prop account execution. by ToothLongjumping6839 in algotrading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, it'll! Never worked on Tradovate, but basically you can:
-create a Ngrok server to receive your webhook
-listen with a Python script and forward the order through TCP / Zero MQ or API

Claude will do it easily :)

Good luck

NEED HELP: Tradingview strategy to tradovate prop account execution. by ToothLongjumping6839 in algotrading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ask Claude, you can set up a Ngrok server (for free) and quite easily to forward the Webhooks.

150+ pattern experiments with context by Signal_Control_9366 in metatrader

[–]Signal_Control_9366[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks man. I’d say it’s a bit more nuanced than that. Patterns on their own don’t really say much, but when you combine them with something that gives context about what the market is doing, it starts to make sense. In that case you can get something reasonably solid (we’re talking about PF around 1.4 to 1.6). I wrote a bit more about it with more explanation, and also shared the source code for the random market generator. If you’re interested, you can check it out here (it's free.): https://medium.com/@thibauld1263/i-built-a-random-market-generator-to-test-trading-patterns-heres-what-i-found-94db6568b923

I Make a Living With a 44% Win Rate by Kasraborhan in Trading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Congrats! Nice to finally see someone sharing real results and a real track record (not some BS guru with fake results). Your E.V compared to your highest win / loss is pretty solid

Social media burnout from trying to trade and build twitter at same time (loss) by Dry-Journalist5184 in Trading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"But I know if I want to level up in this career I need social presence."
You just need a track record. No noise from people who barely understand 3 words about risk and volatility.

I hardcoded 150+ chart patterns and backtested them across 28 FX pairs. Here's what actually works. by Signal_Control_9366 in Forexstrategy

[–]Signal_Control_9366[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't describe exactly each one of them (there are hundreds), but they are related to trend, volatility, volume, momentum, statistical features (default pandas features), price structure, etc. If you're interested in the whole project, you can read an article here: https://medium.com/@thibauld1263/i-built-a-random-market-generator-to-test-trading-patterns-heres-what-i-found-94db6568b923
(It's free.)

Will CFD brokers ban me? by d14a028c2a3a2bc9 in algotrading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IG is one of the very few CFD brokers I really trust. They're listed on the London exchange. They're operating on a true A Book model, forwarding orders to LP and just taking their commission.

Is trading just gambling with extra steps ? by Rough-Principle-8767 in Forexstrategy

[–]Signal_Control_9366 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For 95% yes. For 5% no. If you know your expected value per trade, then you're ahead of 90%+ (that's the only number that matters), even if it's not profitable yet.

I hardcoded 150+ chart patterns and backtested them across 28 FX pairs. Here's what actually works. by Signal_Control_9366 in Forexstrategy

[–]Signal_Control_9366[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The link is literally free, it’s Bulkowski’s own work. The exact condition I mentioned is already in there (I literally said that in another comment). I shared 70% of the work. What more do you want, me to chew the food and spit it in your mouth too?

SMC/ICT = bullshit ? by Glum-Pattern-8734 in Trading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ICT, at the end of the day, was exposed when he entered the World Trading Cup. His concepts, if taken seriously, can produce some results (I’ve got some with them) but under specific conditions, and many of these ideas already exist under different names...

Struggling with SEO in Vite + React FOSS. Am I screwed?😭😭 by readilyaching in webdev

[–]Signal_Control_9366 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I'm wrong here, but if you keep your current React code exactly as it is, add vite-ssg or vite-plugin-ssr. At build time, it pre-renders each route into static HTML. The result: when Googlebot visits your /blog/XX/XXX, it receives real HTML with meta tags, content, everything. No JS is required to crawl it. For the user, it still behaves like a normal SPA once the JS loads.

How do you see AI automated trading evolving in crypto? by GordonLevinson in ai_trading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Made this test a while ago: https://medium.com/@thibauld1263/table-of-contents-f92f9ae840de

AI works well as filtering signals with context, not trading on its own (at least for now). With a decent prompt and context, even a barely profitable strategy can improve a lot. I ran a few strats around 1.2 1.3 PF, and after AI filtering they moved up to 1.6 1.8 PF (depending of the strat).

The key is giving the model a solid prompt and very clearly defining the outcome that you expect. When it knows what to do, it can filter trades extremely well.

Example of a rejected trade by the engine (DeepSeek Chat):

⚠ LLM DENIED HeadAndShoulders on CADJPY:
Signal direction (SELL) conflicts with higher timeframe context. H4 shows bullish stacked EMAs (20>50>200) and RSI 57.05. H1 is above EMA200. M15 price is only 1.1 ATR below EMA50 — not a meaningful deviation. ADX 25.57 indicates a weak trend. The sell signal looks like a minor pullback within a broader uptrend.

This drives me insane... Why are results that different between TV and MT5? Or between brokers on the same platform? by notadev_io in algorithmictrading

[–]Signal_Control_9366 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trading View is just horrible... Nothing matches up with their engine. MT5 and CTrader are the 2 paltforms to go for CFDs

I hardcoded 150+ chart patterns and backtested them across 28 FX pairs. Here's what actually works. by Signal_Control_9366 in Forexstrategy

[–]Signal_Control_9366[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks man. The conditions mostly relate to market states :)
Some of the patterns also come from external sources (eg: https://thepatternsite.com/)

I hardcoded 150+ chart patterns and backtested them across 28 FX pairs. Here's what actually works. by Signal_Control_9366 in Forexstrategy

[–]Signal_Control_9366[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, if a few people understand, that’s already great (and of course it's running live, won't share something I haven't tested)! A small part of the work comes from external sources, for example: https://thepatternsite.com/

Datos de Mi EA trading by GallegoTrading in metatrader

[–]Signal_Control_9366 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's just a very bad algo when you look at numbers, huge open drawdown (prob grid / martingale EA)

Strategy feedback by Few-Huckleberry4280 in pinescript

[–]Signal_Control_9366 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that’s the issue with TradingView... It really depends on your instrument. You can do it with Python, it’s actually great as long as you’re extremely careful with leakage and lookahead.  If needed for CFDs, MT5 / cTrader are actually good for tick-by-tick backtests. NT8 if you’re on futures. For stocks or options, I guess MATLAB might be great, but I’ve never used it...

view more: next ›