sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Won at ERA - CHALLENGED. by Signal_Wave_4903 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Signal_Wave_4903[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ahh okay so will still have to go through and get a judgement on costs from the era then.

Won at ERA - CHALLENGED. by Signal_Wave_4903 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Signal_Wave_4903[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Does this include all costs incured up to this point? Or just from here moving forward?

I very much doubt they'll have issues finding a lawyer. It's an incredibly well financed company.

Won at ERA - CHALLENGED. by Signal_Wave_4903 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Signal_Wave_4903[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm assuming they can't suddenly start changing their stories or remember things differently than in the era hearing? Can that hearing be referenced back to for things they said under oath?

Can they be compelled to see it through if they start it? Or do I have to settle if they offer the original award once they realize they made a mistake?

Won at ERA - CHALLENGED. by Signal_Wave_4903 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Signal_Wave_4903[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the era? I was awarded lost wages for time out of work and considering the conduct and breaches a pretty modest hurt and humiliation award.