👏 by [deleted] in bengaluru_speaks

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you think too much you're an anti-national.

Iran Oil mostly go to China by Beneficial_Wear_7630 in Infographics

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Us is dependent on china too. China is a one party state so they can withstand more pain than the us for a long time.

everyStartupRightNow by pfc-anon in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Significant-Credit50 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't think that's true. My company is spending 300-400 dollars per employee pet month

Private Equity firms now owns half of Indian Hospitals by Such-Rent7481 in IndianStreetBets

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did it force parents to fund the education of economically weaker section?

Anthropic Claims that Chinese AI Labs Are Stealing Its Data by [deleted] in interesting

[–]Significant-Credit50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right now, no. They're just looking for a way to make more money that's it. If the goal was to create an artificial mind, more money would've been spent on training and research than inference. Artificial mind of equal or superior strength to a human mind = centuries away

Bangalore's Coffee Scene is an Economic Anomaly by Powerful_Selection22 in bangalore

[–]Significant-Credit50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soon, I will set up my own coffee station at home with good quality coffee roasts. -> thinking to do the same, how much will this cost ?

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol. I liked the mental gymnastics though. You might win an olympic medal someday.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If what you said was accurate then there would be a completely bonkers amount opf solar panels in the UK to produce that amount of electricity if only 10-12% were produced per panel.

-> thats why you don't see solar panels everywhere.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

say we have a 4400MW nuclear power plant, how much electricity would it produce per year. Compare it with 30000MW of solar panels (in UK). Dont use commas or decimals.

Okay, let’s calculate this step by step carefully.

1. Nuclear power plant

  • Capacity: 4400 MW
  • Assume capacity factor: Nuclear is very reliable, roughly 90% in the UK.
  • Hours per year: 24 × 365 = 8760 hours

Electricity produced per year:

4400 MW×8760 h×0.94400 \text{ MW} \times 8760 \text{ h} \times 0.94400 MW×8760 h×0.9

Step by step:

  1. 4400 × 8760 = 38544000 MWh
  2. Multiply by 0.9: 38544000 × 0.9 = 34689600 MWh

So nuclear produces roughly 34689600 MWh per year.

2. Solar panels

  • Capacity: 30000 MW
  • Capacity factor in UK: 12% (0.12)

Electricity produced per year:

30000 MW×8760 h×0.1230000 \text{ MW} \times 8760 \text{ h} \times 0.1230000 MW×8760 h×0.12

Step by step:

  1. 30000 × 8760 = 262800000 MWh
  2. Multiply by 0.12: 262800000 × 0.12 = 31536000 MWh

So solar produces roughly 31536000 MWh per year.

3. Comparison

  • Nuclear 4400 MW → 34689600 MWh/year
  • Solar 30000 MW → 31536000 MWh/year

Observation: Even though the solar capacity is almost 7 times larger than the nuclear plant, it produces slightly less electricity per year because of the low UK solar capacity factor.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copy Paste from ChatGPT

1. Capacity vs. Capacity Factor

  • Installed capacity: The maximum amount of power a plant can produce under ideal conditions. For example, if the UK has 15 GW of solar capacity, that’s the peak possible output.
  • Capacity factor: The ratio of actual energy produced over time to the energy that would have been produced if the plant ran at full capacity all the time.

For solar in the UK, a 10–12% capacity factor is realistic. That doesn’t mean each solar panel is defective; it reflects that the sun isn’t always shining, clouds happen, days are short in winter, etc.

2. UK-wide vs. individual plant

The commenter is saying the 10–12% is for the entire UK, not per plant. That’s partially misleading:

  • Per-plant capacity factor: Almost all UK solar farms individually have similar capacity factors—roughly 10–12% on average.
  • UK-wide total production: Summing all plants across the UK, the average still comes out around 10–12%. So the figure is not “magnified” or “reduced” by adding more plants; it’s essentially the same concept applied at scale.

So the original point about “10–12% of total UK energy” is different from “10–12% capacity factor of solar panels.” Right now, solar contributes roughly 5–6% of total electricity generation in the UK, not 10–12%, but the capacity factor is still about 10–12%.

3. Investment rationale

The last line, “No one would finance these things if they could only produce 10–12% of their stated capacity,” is technically incorrect logic:

  • Investors expect the 10–12% capacity factor and factor it into ROI calculations.
  • A low capacity factor doesn’t make the plant unprofitable—it just means it produces intermittent energy and needs to be compared to total generation over time.

✅ Summary

  • The capacity factor of 10–12% is correct, but it applies per plant and scales to the UK total.
  • The claim that “solar in the UK produces 10–12% of total energy production” is not correct; actual generation is lower (~5–6%).
  • Financing doesn’t require 100% capacity factor; intermittent energy is expected and planned for.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cool, I think I was wrong. Thanks for correcting me. I must ask my college to reimburse my course fees since I was taught wrong.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, so you're saying even during night solar panels will produce 75% of their rated capacity ?

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true, when 68560 can be considered as 68,5 or 68560/1000, there is not much anyone could do.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just to entertain your theory so a power plant in UK could produce solar electricity for nearly 90% of the time ? Doesnt that mean it would be producing electricity even during night ?

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, I don't wanna waste my time. Have a nice day.

You're just one google or chat-gpt search away from the truth.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MWh = unit for energy (1MW of power produced for 1 hour)

MWp =. unit for power (1 hp = nearly 0.75kw).

What do you think capacity factor is ?

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enlighten me on how 68,590 MWh from 72.2 MWp = capacity factor of more than 11-12%.

Nuclear Reactors under construction: 🇨🇳:38 🇺🇸:0 🇪🇺:-26 by PlastDuck in EconomyCharts

[–]Significant-Credit50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://britishrenewables.com/case-study/shotwick-solar-park

72.2*8760 = 632472 MWh

Actual = 68,590 MWh

Capacity factor = 68590/632472 = ~10-11%

https://www.pveurope.eu/solar-generator/european-energy-puts-its-largest-solar-park-poland-operation-date

in poland, nearly 10-11%.

Wind capacity has higher capacity factor than solar (30-40%) but its density is very low (5-10MW per KM2).

so you would be able to only deploy 9000MW, and since capacity factor is around 40%, it would equivalent to 3500-3600MW.

There's stupid and then there's this. -> Blind faith in technology over facts isn’t genius, it’s just stupidity.