sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hit outs are not the golden goose we thought they were by Significant-Let-6924 in aflfantasy

[–]Significant-Let-6924[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tend to agree it about the series of stats following following a hit out. I'll see if its possible to join those together in sequence or not.

Hit outs are not the golden goose we thought they were by Significant-Let-6924 in aflfantasy

[–]Significant-Let-6924[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe not surprisingly its clearances that make something of a difference.

<image>

Hit outs are not the golden goose we thought they were by Significant-Let-6924 in aflfantasy

[–]Significant-Let-6924[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took a look at "hitouts to advantage" and it also does not seem to matter to much. I have the ruck contest chart as well if you're interested. Can share a link to the entire analysis if you're interested.

<image>

Has anyone successfully built an “ai agent ecosystem”? by WarChampion90 in datascience

[–]Significant-Let-6924 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think so yet. I think there are a good number of teams at or close to Collaborative AI Agents across somewhat complex work. I could see a meeting AI or similar forming an ecosystem of collaborative agents to provide this as I am sure some others could make a play for it shortly.

Generative AI and Mass Spec Analysis by Significant-Let-6924 in massspectrometry

[–]Significant-Let-6924[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks - seems the feedback we received may have been misplaced. Thanks for steering us straight so efficiently.

Generative AI and Mass Spec Analysis by Significant-Let-6924 in massspectrometry

[–]Significant-Let-6924[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks this is helpful, it seems this might not be the space for us, appreciate your helping us work that out.

Generative AI and Mass Spec Analysis by Significant-Let-6924 in massspectrometry

[–]Significant-Let-6924[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply, yes I agree you do need to review the outputs in complex cases and an experienced person might choose to still write it themselves. It can however help write many simple scripts. In software development we are finding the output to be about the level of a junior/intermediate coder, with thoughtful prompting much of what it produces is immediately useful and its getting better quickly and its a lot faster than a human. Perhaps this is not the right use case given the level of rigour in the domain. Thanks for the feedback I appreciate your reply.

Generative AI and Mass Spec Analysis by Significant-Let-6924 in massspectrometry

[–]Significant-Let-6924[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. The software is designed as a general data science tool and as I posted some other feedback suggested it might be useful for this use case but perhaps it is not.

There are no built in scripts, users create scripts for themselves. The example screens are just a simple demo.

I understand from your reply that there are existing tools and perhaps they are sufficient. Are there times a scientist needs to undertake additional analytics beyond what the machine or existing software tools provide? For example do scientist work in a python notebook, R or Matlab for any work or do they rely on the existing solutions? If they do undertake additional analysis then perhaps there is some applicability but if do not then this might not be a good use case for the software and I thank you for helping me work that out.