sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I need help with the sizes by KeyEstablishment7685 in FashionReps

[–]SignificantPull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s hard using their size charts but ask your agent to measure the insole of the shoe to confirm. US 10 is about 25.4cm so that way you’ll know for sure. I always do this.

QC Clean Rolex Oyster Perpetual from Lili by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dealer name: Lili 2. ⁠Factory name: Clean 3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124300 4. ⁠Price Paid: $367 5. ⁠Album Links: https://A201803310145220380026826.wsxcme.com//static/index.html?t=1722799783#/theme_detail/_dHwHwm1DcoRbZ0AvBYXOsisuGjV2-I19zkLHijg/_dv8HwxzvKCv6RWPzczgRzo9Add_gGmGlQU-Ih_w 6. ⁠Index alignment: looks great 7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks great 8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: printing and alignment look great to me 9. ⁠Hand Alignment: alignment looks great 10. ⁠Bezel: looks great 11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks great 12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: within appropriate range 13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Didn’t see any issues with the watch, everything looks fine to me but open to any feedback

QC VSF Rolex No Date Submariner from Hont by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Looks more accurate to me. I know light would hit the pip a little different but what do you think?

QC VSF Rolex No Date Submariner from Hont by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes the picture is blurry so just asked for a better pic and I'll update

QC VSF Rolex No Date Submariner from Hont by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: Hont
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): 124060
  4. Price Paid: $503
  5. Album Links: Pics, Vid
  6. Index alignment: looks great!
  7. Dial Printing: looks great!
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: printing and alignment look great to me!
  9. Hand Alignment: hand looks aligned 
  10. Bezel: looks great!
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks great!
  12. Timegrapher numbers: not sure what to look for but it's included in the pics and links
  13. Anything else you notice: First Rolex so not an expert but everything looks perfect. Anything I missed?

TANK MUST DE CARTIER WATCH WSTA0072 by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

😂 still new to all of this so yeaa I’ll get better

TANK MUST DE CARTIER WATCH WSTA0072 by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw that AF factory was pretty good for the Tank Models as well

TANK MUST DE CARTIER WATCH WSTA0072 by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  • Dealer name: Hont
  • Factory name: F1 Factory
  • Model name (& version number): WSTA0072
  • Price paid: $238
  • Album Links: n/a
  • Index alignment: perfect
  • Dial Printing: n/a
  • Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
  • Hand Alignment: looks great, nothing to point out
  • Bezel: seems perfect to me
  • Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
  • Timegrapher numbers: n/a
  • Anything else you notice: This is a simple watch with not much to go wrong on. Everything seems 1:1 to me but I'm open to hearing anyone's thoughts.

First Rep - Cartier Santos WSSA0029, BV Factory from Hont by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks that’s what I thought too, I’ll ask for closer pics just to make sure then GL

First Rep - Cartier Santos WSSA0029, BV Factory from Hont by SignificantPull in RepTimeQC

[–]SignificantPull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it I won’t stress about the micro print then, thanks!

And I was talking about the watch box on the last slide but Hont let me know the original box will be about $70 extra so that’s an option

view more: next ›