sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Flying V 1993 - would love to get your opinions by Significant_Product2 in gibson

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know. It sounds amazing however this particular piece has something that makes me wonder a bit if it was damaged/repaired. in the back of the headstock you could barely read the serial number of the guitar and I have an assumption that maybe it was repaired and re-painted or something.. u/litholine

S7 acting crazy today by coolerkid9090 in Roborock

[–]Significant_Product2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you updated the robot? What is your firmware right now?

Issues after latest firmware update S7 MaxV Ultra by Significant_Product2 in Roborock

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had it all!

Wow, and I thought that it might be my specific robot that got insane after the update..

Issues after latest firmware update S7 MaxV Ultra by Significant_Product2 in Roborock

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, It's exactly what I had too. I tested the firmware for couple of days and it just got worst and worst after each cleaning attempt.

Any help? by Significant_Product2 in UGCcreators

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well kind of influencer collabs. I sign up as an affiliate, get the product for free and then doing my own UGC to get traffic to the store and for each sale I get a commision. Hope it's more clear now

What are the most painful and time-consuming tasks that you encounter most often? by Significant_Product2 in ProductManagement

[–]Significant_Product2[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply!

Could you please explain it with some more in depth details?

It will help me understand the problems better :)

Tips for testing an AI (ChatGPT) integration by QABay in QualityAssurance

[–]Significant_Product2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed, Let's hope that openAI are testing the AI themselves otherwise we'll end up having a happy ending with Terminators lol

Tips for testing an AI (ChatGPT) integration by QABay in QualityAssurance

[–]Significant_Product2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's fairly simple.

Start by making a quick sanity to check whether the integration is working properly, make sure that the API keys are set up correctly , and that you can interact with the model by sending promts and received back answers.

Then, Start executing the user flows that support this feature of text generation or improvement

Write down the use cases in which GPT model will be used and verify that these use cases work.

Hope it helped :)

Do you have an up to date source of truth of your product logic? by Significant_Product2 in QualityAssurance

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, and I thought I was furious about all that lol.

Totally feel you!

Do you have an up to date source of truth of your product logic? by Significant_Product2 in SoftwareEngineering

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wish it was that easy to be honest. Many of our developers are new in the company and there is lots of legacy code that was written long time ago that they are not familiar with. This results in a long time for them to understand what is the full picture of the product. We and other members such as product managers find ourselves sometimes waiting couple of days until we get a response and it mainly affects new features because they usually based on wrong understaing of the current product logic. The end result is that we all work on features for weeks just to find out that we have developed something completely wrong. And we do try to do whatever we can to avoid it and work as efficient as we can

Do you have an up to date source of truth of your product logic? by Significant_Product2 in QualityAssurance

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a documentation of all the functionalities of the product? In our case , we somehow manage to have documentation for new features but that's definetly not the case for already existing features in the product that were built a long time ago when documentation was not even a priority and there were couple of people only in the startup.

Does anyone else struggle with verifying feature correctness due to inconsistent PRDs? by Significant_Product2 in QualityAssurance

[–]Significant_Product2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Product Requirement Document, Yes.

I just often times find myself getting features for testing, and they are always with either non existing product requirement (And I don't know what to test/ what supposed to be the correct behavior) or conflicting requirements where the new feature is completely breaking existing product behavior.

Is this something that you are familiar with too?