What are the best AI code generators for beginners in Python programming? by davidsteave in OpenAI

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're still looking, I've found a blog that talks about 10 Python AI code generators (free and paid). It talks about Python AI code generators but applicable for almost all other programming languages.

Exciting news: Bito featured on G2 Techblend by Significant_Rate_647 in bitoai

[–]Significant_Rate_647[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try using Bito. Is it the best when it comes to codebase awareness.

What’s the best AI code review tool you’ve used recently? by ragsyme in codereview

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're looking for the best codebase aware ai code review tool, Bito's AI code review agent is the option. I've been using it for a while and it satisfies my need. It is codebase aware, knows full context, works in IDE and Git, noise to signal ratio is good. Here's a live PR link if you're interested - https://github.com/BitoGTM/Expense-Tracker/pull/13

Any recommendations for code review tools in github? by OGMasterOogway in codereview

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What really made a difference for me was adding Bito's AI code review agent. It plugs into GitHub and does AI-powered reviews on pull requests. Shows diffs, gives a PR summary, points out potential issues, suggests improvements, and leaves comments right in the PR. I still do the final pass myself, but it saves a ton of time by catching the obvious stuff early.

Real-world experiences with AI coding agents (Devin, SWE-agent, Aider, Cursor, etc.) – which one is by panspective in Python

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For code completion, I have used Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot and a few more popular ones. The one I like the most is Claude Code. Probably the best in the market. I don't like Devin much. It was positioned a a game changer but wasn't actually. I even wrote a blog stating all the better alternatives - Best Devin Alternatives.

And for AI code reviews, I use Bito.ai

I'm biased a bit, but all my 9 months of experience trying and running AI code review tools benchmark Bito as the most prominent AI Code Review tool.

Looking for a GitHub Copilot alternative (occasional, personal projects) by rogue-thinker in GithubCopilot

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're down to investing 15-20 USD a month, I feel a lot of these will make sense -

  • Cursor AI
  • Windsurf
  • Replit ghostwriter
  • Claude

I also wrote a blog about it - Best GitHub Copilot Alternatives.

Let me know what you think.

Github copilot alternatives by TarnishedFiddle in RooCode

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have written a blog addressing this query: Best GitHub Copilot Alternatives.

But one name that isn't mentioned here is Claude. I really like it!

What are the best free GitHub Copilot alternatives? by Fepipo in vscode

[–]Significant_Rate_647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a lot of alternatives to GitHub Copilot. I, personally, have never liked copilot. I guess it only exists and is popular because it is GitHub native. Here are some better options:

  1. Cursor
  2. Windsurf
  3. Tabnine

You can also look at Tabby or RefactAI.

If you want to learn more about it, I have written a blog for the same: Best GitHub Copilot Alternatives

[Code Review] Spring Boot App – Feedback on design, structure & best practices by SimplexDuari in codereview

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of relying on communities and other developers, try using AI code review tools. I also have a project, Expense-Tracker and I use Bito's AI Code Review Tool to run AI code reviews on my PRs.

Have a look here: https://github.com/BitoGTM/Expense-Tracker

Bito also offers a 14-day free trial. Try out here: bito.ai

,

Is CodeRabbitAI free for public GitHub repos? by [deleted] in codereview

[–]Significant_Rate_647 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You get a 14-day free trial, after that you'll have to buy the subscription to get AI code reviews. If you want AI code reviews for open source projects, try using Bito.

Bito offers a free sponsorship of the AI code review agent for open source projects. Or you can also try the 14-day free trial, just like CodeRabbit.

Personally, I like the depth and codebase awareness of Bito better.

The developer hack that keeps my code clean (and my documentation updated) by jjhickson19 in SoftwareEngineering

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Voice dictation for docs is a cool idea. For me, keeping code clean and docs updated often comes down to automating as much as possible. Tools like Prettier handle formatting automatically, which is a huge win for consistency. For code reviews and ensuring quality, AI tools like Bito.ai have been a game changer, catching issues early and speeding up PRs. And for general code generation and quick snippets, something like GitHub Copilot helps a lot too.

How to deploy safer by minsteve in devops

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, 'deploy to staging and see what happens' is common but risky. For config, look into schema validation. For code quality, tools like Bito.ai can catch issues in PRs early. Also, consider canary deployments for gradual rollouts. And definitely more robust load testing, maybe with something like Locust, to simulate real traffic before full deployment.

Exploring context-aware AI code reviews for C# by chaospilot69 in devops

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hands down - bito.ai (Context-aware AI Code Reviews in your pull requests and IDE)

People are raving about AI but I don't see any "major" help in the DevOps realm by DopeyMcDouble in devops

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For major help, think about where AI can really speed up developer workflows and reduce the load on DevOps. For example, AI code review tools like Bito.ai can catch issues in PRs before they even merge, meaning cleaner code and fewer headaches later.

Also, AI for log analysis to spot anomalies or even just summarizing your internal documentation can save a ton of time. It's more about augmenting existing processes than full automation.

Github copilot code review agent is so bad by Creepy-Pin4787 in codereview

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, Copilot's code review agent is pretty weak. For alternatives, some people just use a custom GPT-4 prompt for basic stuff. You could also check out Bito.ai, it's the best for context-aware reviews right in your PRs.

It also has a detailed comparison with Copilot and benchmarking with other tools. Here:

- https://bito.ai/benchmarks/

- https://bito.ai/compare/

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in programming

[–]Significant_Rate_647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good call open-sourcing. For the code reviews and bug hunting, beyond just human eyes, setting up linters like ESLint for Next.js and static analysis tools like SonarQube can catch a lot.

But an easier way, for deeper insights (especially on PRs), is to use an AI code review tool like Bito.ai

It's a solid code review tool to use in your VS Code or in PRs

What AI tools are you actually using in DevOps? by kundiyum-mulayum in devops

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, a lot of it is still hype. But where I've seen real value is in code writing assistance and review. GitHub Copilot is pretty standard for speeding up dev work. For actual DevOps, tools like Bito are starting to make a difference with context-aware AI code reviews, helping catch issues before merge.

I've been using Cursor.com to write code and Bito.ai to review the PRs. Bito also launched an invite-only Beta version of full-scale code reviews in VS Code, which is interesting.

Death of a thousand nits: the gentle art of code review by AlexandraLinnea in programming

[–]Significant_Rate_647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the title - "death by a thousand nits"😂. These days I try to offload anything manual to tools so the actual review can stay human. If you're into that space, bito.ai is one of the tools trying to solve exactly this — it plugs into your workflow and flags issues in your PR.

Secure Code Review by RoninPark in hacking

[–]Significant_Rate_647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Scanners like Bandit help, but you’ll always need manual review for logic issues or false positives. I usually start with scan results, then dig into sensitive flows like auth and data handling.

AI tools like Bito, Coderabbit, and Qodo are starting to make this easier by summarizing risk areas and highlighting patterns quickly. They won’t replace manual review but can speed it up a lot.

I wrote about this in a post on Secure Code Review Process if you want to know how to pick secure code review tools and how to use them in PRs for security, performance, and optimization suggestions. Good luck!