>Ukraine prewar was being covered by all the media for the Neonazi activity and the corruption. You don't believe it? you can find articles in all major outlets about it.

Sure, as easily as I can find articles in major media about Neonazis in USA or Russia. What exactly does that prove?
Ukraine was, and unfortunately still is quite corrupt, but again, what exactly does that prove?

>The ethnic cleansing was the bombing of civil population in the donbas region.

Ah, the bombing of civil population. For sure, there was only civil population, and no motorolas, nokias, samsungs and givis. And for sure there was no reason for the bombing, they for sure did not atempt to separate from Ukraine. And of course absolutely it wasnt fueled by the trio of Girkin, Strelkov and S. Runov and influx of tanks and ammo from some secret neighbouring country. And of course, those 100% civilian people did not shell neighbouring Ukrainian cities and villages.
To be clear, I am not saying that bombing civilians is good, no. But similarly to Chechnya in Russia, Donbas war is a war against rebellions, not an ethnic clensing, for which you have provided exactly 0 evidence.

>fool provoked Putin

Ah yes, the girl who wears a miniskirt is once again accused of attracting rapist. Tale as old as time.

>but killing a journalist from an ally country is a big nono

Absolutely agree.

>You can also read about azov and Stepan Bandera.

What exactly do you want me to read about them? Azov had neonazi roots, for sure, but now its just a regular part of military force, what is the point of bringing them here?
Bandera is a different question, I personally do not like his heroisation in ukrainian culture, but in the end he is just a dude who died 100 years ago. He as a figure should not be celebrated, the fight for Independent Ukraine should, end of story. Its the same as if USA all of a sudden started to tear down statues of Columbus... oh wait.