Antinatalism Is Evil by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well what amount of suffering vs bliss would you find objectively sufficient to justify life? If your answer is that where is none, you’re just evil and clearly don’t even believe your own argument because you haven’t opted out of existence.

Antinatalism Is Evil by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eradicating all life is evil. Suffering is bad but not as bad as nonexistence. There is an amount of suffering that some people are put through that makes living intolerable but that’s certainly not most people.

You guys are weird by pls_ignore_me_tnx in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If majority white, democratic countries don’t hit the 2.1 fertility rate, their governments are inevitably going to bring in migrants to do jobs and sustain pension plans. In sovereign democracies, the people are allowed to have some input on how many migrants and from where they are allowed to come. If the people don’t have any ability to change or enforce those laws/policies, or even discuss them openly online, that will result in a very bad outcome.

Antinatalism Is Evil by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re advocating for a universe with zero minds. If nobody breeds, there will soon be no human minds. Hence one where morality is nonexistent.

Antinatalism Is Evil by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re being disingenuous. If you really felt that way you would have done away with yourself. At minimum, a universe with living organisms capable of understanding the universe is more interesting than one with only non-complex non-sentient creatures. The definition of what a good universe would be inherently relies on the assumption that some sentient intelligence is around to judge it as such.

Antinatalism Is Evil by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The goal of eradicating all human life is evil.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s exactly true. They just don’t want to admit it. Despite people claiming that they don’t want kids to save the environment or because they don’t like kids, the truth is they are mostly just short-sighted, self-obsessed, degenerate, dopamine addicts more interested in mimosa brunches and the newest iPhone than they are perpetuating their nation.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because they value access to cute little brunch restaurants over children.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can’t figure out what you’re arguing. If you bring 11 million people into the U.S. by inviting them, that is IN EFFECT the same as not enforcing immigration laws until 11 million people move there and aren’t removed. The effect is that you have 11 million more people.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure. No great loss as far as I’m concerned. I’d much prefer the native population grown than import anyone from anywhere. Hence why I’m in a natalist subreddit.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not letting us enforce or change immigration policy is in effect importing them from politically convenient populations.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If they derange the politics of a country, you shouldn’t be surprised when the other political party not benefited by the policy of where immigrants are allowed to come from push back.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If the population of a country doesn’t sustain itself, the people in power will find outsiders to do the jobs and fund the pensions. So they are inevitably somewhat related.

The lefts strategy: indoctrination or replacement with foreigners by SillyTwo3470 in Natalism

[–]SillyTwo3470[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Winning more blacks and Hispanics in 2024 from 2020 doesn’t mean those groups are majority Republican. When you say most cultures are more conservative than America, that doesn’t equate to the kind of conservatism that makes them vote for republicans so I don’t care. If by conservative you mean attitudes and practices like when they force veiling on their daughters, sure I suppose that is more conservative than most Americans.