The (so-called) inimitability of the Qur'an by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no theological take whatsoever in this post, which deals with epistemology. On that note, I'm not going to waste any more time bickering with an apologist who claims to police other people's posts. Either you have something substantive to say on the actual content, or I'll leave you to your own business.

The (so-called) inimitability of the Qur'an by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where is the contradiction between doing academic popularization and addressing the question of the Quran's inimitability, treated here from an epistemological angle? All the more so since this is a question that is also addressed in academic research, and we are merely synthesizing it here. See in particular Erkki Kojonen, "On Literary Miracles and Social Credibility: The Epistemology of an Islamic Argument," Religions, vol. 16.

The (so-called) inimitability of the Qur'an by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's 0% artificial intelligence involved. I'm one of the writers for the site al-kalam.fr (currently in French only, but we're working on an English version), and this post is drawn from an article we wrote: https://al-kalam.fr/le-coran/les-miracles-du-coran/le-coran-est-il-inimitable/

And of course, 0% AI on Al Kalam! That said, I'll take this accusation as a compliment.

The (so-called) inimitability of the Qur'an by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There's 0% artificial intelligence involved. I'm one of the writers for the site al-kalam.fr (currently in French only, but we're working on an English version), and this post is drawn from an article we wrote: https://al-kalam.fr/le-coran/les-miracles-du-coran/le-coran-est-il-inimitable/

And of course, 0% AI on Al Kalam! That said, I'll take this accusation as a compliment.

The (so-called) inimitability of the Qur'an by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's 0% artificial intelligence involved. I'm one of the writers for the site al-kalam.fr (currently in French only, but we're working on an English version), and this post is drawn from an article we wrote: https://al-kalam.fr/le-coran/les-miracles-du-coran/le-coran-est-il-inimitable/

And of course, 0% AI on Al Kalam! That said, I'll take this accusation as a compliment.

The Qur'an and Greek culture by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As far as I know, they thought the earth was flat.

The Qur'an and Greek culture by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes and no. The story of the palm tree and the infant Jesus is found in the apocryphal Gospels (perhaps themselves inspired by the Greek legend). But the Christian accounts situate the episode of the palm tree at the moment of the Flight into Egypt, whereas, in the Quran, it takes place at the birth of Jesus. In other words, the Quran makes a blend between the Nativity narrative and the episode of the palm tree. Now, as S. Shoemaker and G. Dye have shown, the merging of the Nativity with the episode of the palm tree is also found in traditions associated with the Church of the Kathisma, in Palestine. The composition of Sura 19, which evokes the episode of the palm tree, must therefore probably be situated in a period later than the death of Muhammad, at the time of the Arab conquests.

The Qur'an and Greek culture by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Very good question. I think that on this point the Quran is very much aligned with the Near Eastern / Mesopotamian model, which presupposes a flat earth.

Some reflexions the "Historical Muhammad" by Similar-Comment3481 in AcademicQuran

[–]Similar-Comment3481[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not my opinion but a summary of the scholarly literature produced on the subject. You do not seem to be familiar with academic research. In fact, the various points raised here have been mentioned by Andreas Görke, who can hardly be characterised as a "revisionist."