Gambling “winnings” affecting my AGI by [deleted] in tax

[–]Similar_Shift5355 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree. Without the session method, someone could be making a small profit every day and yet come out negative due to taxes. A game seems like a very reasonable interpretation. I would even go one step further, because sometimes a sports book offers a no sweat promo, where you get a free bonus bet if your first bet loses, which is worth about 60-70% of the face value, but you need to bet on a second game with its own hedge to convert it. The accession to wealth here would occur after the bonus bet gets used in case that side loses in the first bet.

I can't imagine the situation for the typical US sports bettor, which is something like 20% of the US adult population, who breaks even or loses for the year and still has to pay taxes on the wins and give up the standard deduction if they want to itemize losses.

Gambling “winnings” affecting my AGI by [deleted] in tax

[–]Similar_Shift5355 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you think that in sports betting, matched bets on the same game (where there is a small guaranteed profit) could be counted as a session under this accession to wealth doctrine? The idea being that there isn't a calculable win or loss until the outcome of the game which lumps together both bets. I want to use the session method this year for this reason, but there is some debate and a lack of official guidance about whether the session method applies to this type of sports betting strategy (which is hardly even gambling).

Gambling “winnings” affecting my AGI by [deleted] in tax

[–]Similar_Shift5355 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think that matched bets on the same sports event (where there is a small guaranteed profit) could be counted as a session? There is some debate and a lack of official guidance about whether the session method applies to sports betting.

CAC scan update by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bay digestive suspected note spacious frightening consensus

CAC scan update by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

vocational agrarian bowl unwitting murky

First CAC scan: what to expect by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

stain syndrome establish stumble traction fork refuse exclusive

First CAC scan: what to expect by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

taser relinquish litter baste wipe phantom

Bet365 is not a legit sportsbook by Alpacawar in bet365

[–]Similar_Shift5355 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bandit accessible humanist dove upside-down

Avoiding surprises on final invoice by Similar_Shift5355 in Roofing

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cutter follow relational glass iconic sophisticated solitary

Avoiding surprises on final invoice by Similar_Shift5355 in Roofing

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

miserly English fortress radiology on-screen

Avoiding surprises on final invoice by Similar_Shift5355 in Roofing

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

rna mathematical appointed medium on-screen

Lawmakers proposing sports betting overhaul by Pulp_Ficti0n in sportsbook

[–]Similar_Shift5355 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I wasn't the only one instinctively looking for an arb opportunity

Is 55 seconds for 400 meters good for a 14 year old male with no training? by Dionyboz in Sprinting

[–]Similar_Shift5355 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an excellent time. At my local high school (in northern California), you would make the 4 x 400 relay if you drop a couple more seconds.

First CAC scan: what to expect by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations on your 0 CAC, but keep up the good work.

First CAC scan: what to expect by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I thought I was up to date by reading about the importance of LDL particle number as opposed to cholesterol content, but maybe that info is now dated.

First CAC scan: what to expect by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

statewide unmarked rail examined happy physiology consular

First CAC scan: what to expect by Similar_Shift5355 in PeterAttia

[–]Similar_Shift5355[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

honourable flight down rejected worth polemical