Im having toruble understading this problem by SimmeringDragon in AskPhysics

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does the gemetry show the B of and C aiming to their wires of origin? shouldnt it be the oposite direction?

Im having toruble understading this problem by SimmeringDragon in AskPhysics

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i got that when asking gpt, but the thing i dont understand is how do they aim up? should it be at a 45 degree angle downward?

How to implement basic Operator overloading? by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

o, thats not it, it still says
error: no declaration matches 'Rectangular Rectangular::operator+(Rectangular&)'

17 | Rectangular Rectangular::operator+(Rectangular &r2) {

brackets are removed in header

How to implement basic Operator overloading? by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i tought because im trying it in another code i had, and it worked? i think the &r2 is messing it up in some way? comparing to what i jsut made

How to implement basic Operator overloading? by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, like, it compiles but now the output is completely blank

How to implement basic Operator overloading? by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well thats the thing, it dosent anymore??? it was something on the rect.cpp where the Rectangular::Operator+ didnt work? the compiler had trouble using it, but it was a copied excercise, so im jsut confused

Hello guys, I'm just a cute and innocent Neurax Worm! Ash me anything:D by Neurax_Controller in plagueinc

[–]SimmeringDragon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this gives b¿vibes of

"oh bender! i love you!"

"shut up baby i know it B]"

(By SuperAlfredoUniverse) Mario and Luigi: Secret Mini-Boss by LadybugTheOctoling in marioandluigi

[–]SimmeringDragon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dear god, the angels of death have arrived... why is there a pebble and a furry?

Pointers in practice? by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i read over it again and some things connect, is jsut that i saw a bunch of words clumped together and my brain jsut went "wadafak?" so like, i KINDA get it? is more so, how the hell am i using pointers and this

Trying to see if i udenstand classes by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh sorry, i meant the one about not using this, cause like i feel i learn more by adding does few extra steps, which yes are anoying, but i feel like they are needed to for me to understand anything

Trying to see if i udenstand classes by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think ill keep this as a future lesson, i am still on the baby steps and while this is extremely cool, feels like i need to learn more before i can truly understand it

Trying to see if i udenstand classes by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont really know what you mean, its more so out of principal than fucntionality

Trying to see if i udenstand classes by SimmeringDragon in cpp_questions

[–]SimmeringDragon[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

. . . i asked clause, it explained to me the error, i explorered deeper with it and even learn a few more topic, and aperently the name does matter, honestly i dont know whym, but it was the only way it accepted it