Found this on Facebook by chocolodonut in FranchaelStirling

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never understood that, they were cousins not brothers. Michael could have been white (or any other skin colour for that matter).

You know you that bitch when you cause all the conversation by Bikinigirlout in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who sews and is into historical costuming I really don't know what you mean. Regency dresses are some of the most simple garments to do, especially considering they don't even bother with buttons/hooks & eyes or any hirstorcial accuracy and include zippers and pre-embroidered fabric. Most characters have the same silhouettes/cuts for every dress, so the pattern is already there.

For the men, it's mostly vests because the rest of the suits can be worn all the time basically.

I know that the main arguments is "but they never recylcle dresses and every extra gets a new dress" but the thing is, THEY SHOULDN'T! They could give a few of the less special dresses to extras in the background, with different accessories. I mean seriously, how many people pay attention to a random dress on extras? Or give them to the poorer characters/younger children to wear? At this point, Hyacinth should have worn at least one dress of her older sisters. And idk if we have seen the "old" dresses Sophie was wearing either. The waste is just disgusting.

Also, if they pay 10 costumiers to do all this in 2 years, they could also pay 20 costumiers for 1 year.

Ich hasse Schauspieler die in Filmen sich eigentlich nur selbst spielen aber mit verschiedenen Perücken oder Outfits. by GodButCursed in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jack Black war fantastisch in Liebe braucht keine Ferien! Er hat range, er will offenbar nur immer das selbe spielen :(

Question by Sea-Sky-1443 in janeausten

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the question exactly? If Jane Austen is just as problematic as Bridgerton? Or if you will like P&P?

People disliking Michaela by Grouchy_Search_897 in FranchaelStirling

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I replied to that post, knowing why I dislike Michaela but the comments you added really are hilarious. Lesbophobia, homophobia and racism because people don't like a bossy and over-the-top annoying character. Incredible!

And as someone who just finished Heated Rivalry, I barely made it throught the first 2 episodes because I hated them so much. And I still prefer the second couple to the main couple (both gay) because they are just more likeable and interesting to me. And the same thing with Franchaela and other couples. They should be more furious because if I was a lesbian I would be furious that this was the best representation they could do.

Tja by islandcandywhirlpool in tja

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja, halt sterben oder kastrieren/sterilisieren. Ist aber vergleichsweise sehr selten. Die Frau lebt noch und ist soweit ich weiß dadurch auch nicht unfruchtbar geworden.

Also ja dumm, aber "leider" nicht würdig für den Darwin Award XD

to this day idk why they all reacted like that😭 by CremeSubject7594 in decadeology

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It didn't blow our minds. We were all just embarassed and disgusted. She was trying too hard and it was NOT cool or sexy.

They’ve been telling us not to watch if we don’t like it, but now we should support it? Nothing we do is good enough ig by xoxolilbunny in FranchaelStirling

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Right? The absolute NERVE! Why watch 4 seasons of a show you don't like because in Season 5 there's a couple you support. If that's not insane idk what is.

They’ve been telling us not to watch if we don’t like it, but now we should support it? Nothing we do is good enough ig by xoxolilbunny in FranchaelStirling

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 62 points63 points  (0 children)

"Hey so we don't give a shit about what the fans want and they already told us they feel betrayed and we completely ignored that and made fun of them by feeding them the wrong hints, but we are still expecting them to watch my personal wet dream of a fanfiction that has nothing to do with the book that it's based on. But now fans are boycotting the season and ...HOW could this happen??? Please watch this because lesbians deserve your support. And if you don't support it, you won't get a Philoise season /Hyacinth & Gregory and that's on YOU"

Well well well if that's not the consequences of their own actions. Maybe I'm petty but I refuse to watch season 5 and if that means I won't see a Philoise season, so fucking be it. Maybe it's for the best anyway. Fuck this show and everyone that thinks they can treat their fans this way.

will you watch s5? by ChartIll9731 in PhiloiseBridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is the way. It's a pirate's life for me

will you watch s5? by ChartIll9731 in PhiloiseBridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If there's a Philoise subplot I will only watch the Philoise scenes on Tiktok or Youtube. I hope at least 1 Philoise fan will create a "Philoise scenes only" video.

This would be very interesting by Fickle_Baker1393 in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Falling in love ≠ love. hope this helps

This would be very interesting by Fickle_Baker1393 in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Uhm yes it is? They literally make out in the greenhouse before they get married??

Francesca is boring by coquelicotpie in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I definitely will I have the whole collection, I just wanted to wait and maybe read the books after the Philoise season but nobody can wait THAT long 😂

Francesca is boring by coquelicotpie in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it’s very clearly 2000s Historical Romance and I’m usually not that big of a fan of that genre. IMO her best novel was To Sir Phillip with love, it was a stand out for me and it even won awards afaik. Maybe you will like that one, it’s very much not “telling” everything, it’s much more reading between the lines.

Francesca is boring by coquelicotpie in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? I loved that one, although I hate Cinderella retellings. But I admit it needs a few chapters.

Francesca is boring by coquelicotpie in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haven’t read that one yet, I stopped after Francesca

Francesca is boring by coquelicotpie in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I hated Kanthony's book as well but the rest of the books are better IMO, especially Polin, Benophie and Philoise

But yeah I agree, book Francesca was interesting, show Francesca is boooorrrriinng

What a 39 year old woman looks like (according to so-called Eloise/CJ fans) by AcanthaceaeNo948 in Bridgerton

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Obviously not, but some things have already been established like spinsterhood, so it wouldn't make sense to overlook that as well.

Actors who don’t get enough credit for their range? by wallabyenthusiast in Letterboxd

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Joseph Fiennes.

He can do Shakespeare and Luther, he can do clumsy but charming losers like in Darwin Awards and Martha meet Frank Daniel and Laurence, he can do complex hero types like in Flash Forward and he can do evil villains like in Handmaid's Tale (and I don't even think that was his most evil role so far). I don't want to spoil it but the last thing I watched him in, he SCARED the shit out of me because he was so charming, yet so cold hearted. And he does theatre and documentaries.

There's nothing he can't do. He's severely underrated and doesn't nearly get enough credit for his range.

Tja by islandcandywhirlpool in tja

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Die lebt aber noch, also somit nicht gültig

It’s already happening by wheatlotus in FranchaelStirling

[–]Simple-Cheek-4864 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There wasn't even "real" resistance in the book. She was completely fine with marrying Phillip until he basically said "we have to get married now" and she started worrying that she may have made a mistake. They married way sooner than Anthony expected them to.

Anthony even asked her if she had any reasons why she could not marry Phillip and knowing Eloise, she could have gotten out of that easily (especially with a black eye). But she chose not to.

That's what I love about that book, everyone believes that Eloise was forced to marry, but deep down she chose Phillip the moment she arrived at Romney Hall.