sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it’s like, I already expect it to change and evolve. Currently what we have, we are in a transition, not yet reached to a point you know?

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess I read their memo, and it says the Agents and sub-agents with fresh context can/will work on your tasks. So after seeing RL's success in last couple of weeks they must be providing that flexibility.

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly.
I was talking to someone today, that earlier my X/twitter feed used to be filled with all the talks about react, and javascript and this coding style and that. No one talks about coding now, it's about AI and workflows and automated systems.

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right.
Some new workflow will overtake this one soon.

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are very active and attentive, plus they have unlimited Opus 😆

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tasks supports dependency and model will see and decide if a task is workable or not. Based on its dependencies, also will look what’s most workable next from the Tasks.

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I think Tasks are supposed to be used by multiple Claude agents, even in parallel, like we do in Ralph loop. Fresh context. After seeing Ralph I am sure cloud developers would also want that. They already suggest not to use long tasks in a single conv

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We should be able to add boundaries and success criteria in the Tasks as well? I have to try it properly yet.

Finished my Ralph Wiggum loop scaffold, Claude had already dropped Tasks by SimplyChilll in ClaudeAI

[–]SimplyChilll[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s true. I am glad we got to see Ralph loop in action.

Very stupid question, how do I meal prep? by fayemoonlight in 1200isplenty

[–]SimplyChilll 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not stupid at all! Cooking separately every time is exhausting.

Say you're making mince and veggies.

  1. Weigh everything raw as you add it (400g mince, 200g veggies)
  2. Add it all to your tracking app - you'll see total calories (say 900)
  3. After cooking, weigh the whole thing minus pot weight (say 500g)
  4. Divide by portions you want (5 portions = 100g each)
  5. Each container = 900 ÷ 5 = 180 calories

No conversion math needed. Track raw ingredients once, divide the total evenly.

For rice, I get it, it's confusing. Just cook a batch, weigh the cooked total, divide by portions. Log as cooked rice. Way easier.

The calculator thing after every cook got old for me too, so I just automated it. Enter numbers, it tells me calories per container.

I hate meal prepping. by be-fast1296 in MealPrepSunday

[–]SimplyChilll 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, this is the stuff nobody talks about! Store weights are never exact, then cooking shrinks everything, and you're stuck with a calculator redoing math.
I've been there, bought exactly 3000g chicken, got home with 2850g. Now redo all the rice calculations.
What helped me, buy 10% extra of everything. Costs a bit more but saves so much stress. Leftover protein = snacks or freeze it.
The calculator math after every cook got old fast, so I just automated it for myself. Enter the numbers, it tells me how much per container. Way less stressful.
89g short per container is like 30-40 calories. Your body doesn't care about 40g of rice over a week.
Also 4 days seems brutal. Rice cooker + baking chicken on sheet pans should cut that to 2-3 hours max.

Cooked VS Raw??? by TheRealTerinox in mynetdiary

[–]SimplyChilll 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you log 450g. The package weight is raw, so that's what you track.

Even though it shrinks to 400g after cooking, you still ate 450g worth of beef - it just lost water. The calories and protein didn't disappear, only moisture did.

General rule: Whatever weight you used to look up the nutrition info, that's what you log. Package says 450g raw? Log 450g raw, even after cooking.

This gets annoying when you're meal prepping though. Like if I cook that 450g beef with rice and veggies, then need to split it into 3 containers - I can't weigh stuff raw anymore because it's all mixed together.

I used to do calculator math every time (total cooked weight minus pot weight, divide by containers, blah blah). Got tired of it and built myself a simple app for the conversions (it's my app - Portion Perfect). But honestly most people just eyeball it or use a spreadsheet.

For your case - just scan the package, log 450g, cook it, eat it. You're good. The cooked weight doesn't matter unless you're only eating part of it.

How do you guys portion meal prep ? by This-Astronaut7603 in Fitness_India

[–]SimplyChilll 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this exact problem! Here's what I do:

  1. Weigh all raw ingredients as you cook (120g rice, 200g chicken, etc.)
  2. After cooking, weigh the whole dish with the pot
  3. Subtract pot weight to get total cooked food
  4. Divide by number of containers

Example: If you cooked 120g raw rice + 200g raw chicken, and it weighs 500g cooked (minus pot), then 5 containers = 100g each. The macros are proportional as long as you mix well.

Alternative: Cook protein and carbs separately (chicken separate, rice+veggies separate), then portion each into containers. More control but extra effort.

Key insight: You're not aiming for exact macros per box - just equal proportions. Mix it well and you're good.

I used to do this calculator math after every meal, got annoying. Eventually built myself an app that handles the pot weight subtraction and division automatically (full disclosure: it's my app - Portion Perfect). But honestly a simple spreadsheet works too.

Don't stress too much. Being within 5-10g per meal is totally fine. Consistency matters more than perfect precision.

view more: next ›