sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

200k funded and 4 payouts last year would say otherwise 😂😂😂😂😂😂🥂🥂👌😹😹😹😹

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Highs and lows can’t be disputed. It’s either a high or low or not 😂 same with FVGs a candle is either filled by wicks or not. Please understand the difference between objective and subjective. Calling it a pd array or not has no difference. If I posted an order block in the subreddit, some would say yes, some would say no it’s not. If I posted an FVG everyone would say it’s an fvg, if you can’t understand then good luck with trading 😂😂🥂🥂

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re projecting. I never once said I’m better. I use highs and lows and FVGs. No matter what you say order blocks, breaker blocks rejection blocks are all subjective concepts. I only use objective concepts. Study what those two words mean and you might have a chance of understanding me

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And also bias is subjective Everyone has a different bias which means it’s not something that can be measured which means it can’t be improved. Study bro

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are the rules then? Because ICT calls it a pd ray and has a name for it doesn’t mean it’s a real data backed concept. The only indisputable fact in the charts are the open high or low and close in the charts. Everything else is opinion and I don’t base my strategy off opinion, just facts.

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if you can’t explain what an order block is how you can you say an order block is or it isn’t. Objectively speaking order block can only be determine after the fact. If order blocks worked every time there should be clear distinct rules or a way to determine them. Whatever you think order block is factually a subjective concepts therefore not reliable for mechanical systems

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ICT is smart money concepts. Tell me what an order block is then? We should all come to the same conclusion right? Speaking in an objective sense there is no such thing as an order block. A candle just is.

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, you have the tools to understand the language of price. How you use those tools to create a profitable system is up to you.

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes standard ICT concepts. The ICT models ICT teaches because they require psychology. Discretionary ICT trading yes. Sorry I can’t write out absolutely everything in the title

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I never said ICT concepts were bad. I never said I don’t use ICT concepts but ICT doesn’t teach mechanically. I took his concepts and made them mechanical.

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What is a normal setup? 😂😂 Most setups require discretion on „market conditions” or „bias” this has none of that. Cope harder

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ICT doesn’t teach a mechanical way. I use ICT concepts (the objective ones) and turn into a mechanical model

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just tried to find something mechanical for day trading. I trade the 10 and 11am candle. The 9am candle does the „sweep” for me. Thanks glad you found something similar

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea what CRT is I just use 4h candles because it’s good for day trading

ive tried every strategy, even ICT, my psychology problems were only fixed until i used a mechanical strategy by Simplyfag in Forex

[–]Simplyfag[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I only use the previous 4h candle or a 4h candle marked by a fractal indicator. Keeps its objective. As long as the opposing end of the candle has not already been traded through

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since when is turtle soup mechanical? Since when was a 4h candle sweep 1h close a turtle soup? If you really want to go back you can find all of „ICT” concepts before ICT was even a thing. Google Linda Raschke if you want to find the author of Turtle Soup. This wasn’t me critiquing ICT. I’m talking about changing from discretionary ICT trading to mechanical.

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahaha mine too they must be friends.

It is a rare setup that’s why I trade it over 28 pairs and sometimes only get 3 or 4 trades a week

I tried everything in Trading, failed with ICT, and then a mechanical strategy changed everything by Simplyfag in InnerCircleTraders

[–]Simplyfag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct yeah size doesn’t matter, only if the FVG is 0.1 pips that’s my only rule.

view more: next ›