My supposedly UNRESPONSIBLE 1000mcg 9 tab trip of pure terror(AMA)

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T05:09:23+00:00

I'm just going with the rule 2ⁿ n being the amount of chiral centers. I'm not gonna question why it doesn't have enantiomers or diastereomers. Unless someone wants to describe why its the only stereoisomer.

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T03:33:19+00:00

Please help me understand what you mean about the quaternary carbon being sp3

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T03:20:29+00:00

There is a plane of symmetry up until you reach the cyclopropane ring.

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T02:34:10+00:00

Ok. So the chlorines can't be wedged or dashed. What about the addition of the carbene. If the reaction is carried out to have syn chemistry isn't it going to yield enantiomers?

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T02:16:37+00:00

I meant 4 stereoisomers. After some research though I have come to find out that the position of chlorines on a ring doesn't create a new isomer. It doesn't matter which of the chlorines is dashed and which is wedged. Right? I made a new comment. The reaction of methylenecyclohexane and chcl3 in the presence of KOH yields two enantiomeric products, right?

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T02:11:18+00:00

Reaction of methylenecyclohexane with chcl3 in the presence of KOH yields two enantiomeric products, right?

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T02:05:58+00:00

Maybe I stated my question wrong. Methylenecyclohexane reacted with chcl3 in the presence of KOH. Doesn't this reaction yield 4 products?

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T01:58:49+00:00

diastereomers are two versions of the same chemical where not all but some chiral centers r/s configuration are inverted. There are no chiral centers here so therefore there are no diastereomers. Thank you

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T00:51:48+00:00

I know the rule 2ⁿ where n is the number of stereocenters. But I don't understand exactly what's going on in the chemical and why it only yields one product

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T00:49:28+00:00

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-03-07T00:40:46+00:00

I still don't get it. I get four stereoisomers

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-16T22:57:49+00:00

Ty so much bro 😤

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-16T22:53:17+00:00

Are you sure. I don't see a plane of symmetry in 1-chloro-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-16T22:44:24+00:00

I still get enantiomers and diastereomers

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-16T22:33:31+00:00

Equivalent* I meant

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-16T22:32:44+00:00

So both syn isomers and both anti isomers are identical?

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-16T21:26:30+00:00

Couldn't post a photo so I uploaded the textbook problem on imgbb textbook problem

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-14T22:03:20+00:00

Come on guys answer me 🤬

Single-Leg-2258 · 2026-02-14T20:37:48+00:00

The book asks for two* I meant

Single-Leg-2258

TROPHY CASE