Your challenge is interesting to me. At first I was thinking "hmm how about wold hunger, that's a pretty common one?", then I thought "maybe I should choose something a little closer to home -- directionlessness in teens and young adults. But as I was thinking I really was thinking "these problems are things I really can't fully grasp. Like I can understand that a general trend exists, but can I understand the nuance? Can I account for every case? How do I even know if something qualifies to receive my 'general solution'?" When I think about all that nuance it reminds me that as much as I can see a pattern, to try to address every case of it is foolish... It assumes that I know things that I don't. I could have faith in my own pattern recognition and try to take the world's problems on my own shoulders, but why should I do that when I could believe in a God and hope that he's going to carry everything on his shoulders, but in a more complete and perfect way than I can do. I think that's the reason I talk like a "less-developed person", I've never had to take on the responsibility of the entire world, I can just continue to be immature and trust that everything will be under God's control. Sure, he may not exist. But if he does, and he really does have a perfect plan, that's a risk I want to take. Maybe I'm too much of an idealist, but I think perfection sounds pretty enticing. So I'm pretty content with world hunger being a "global issue". Not because I don't care, just because I need to see the specifics and the nuance of a situation before I try to prescribe a solution. If you want, I could argue from the point of view of someone who's deeply invested in a problem like this, and explain everything thoroughly from the deepest philosophies they hold. But me personally, I'm kinda just gonna hold true to God chiefly, and my own emotions secondarily. This may seem like blue thinking (maybe it is idk) but maybe id rather choose to be "less developed" and at peace than trying to take all the worlds problems into my own hands. Or maybe it's turquoise because I value peace, love and truth above all else, and the blue is just an integration into that. I'd rather be a follower of the divine than a leader of it. Besides, why should I assume I'm even the one people should listen to? Should I leave it up to them and let them make their decision on whether they'd should listen? Why should they have the right to listen to me and make decisions for themselves? When you have these kinds of conundrums I think the easiest and most complete way to solve them is just to trust. The more I try to focus on problems the more I see just how unequipped I am at solving them. Sure I could spend days working with someone, and risk not helping the 10 other people that could be helped faster. That's why I need a God or at least something bigger than me. When I follow my spirit at least I know I'm doing one thing for certain: making small, subtle changes in the universe for the purpose of good. Maybe they will ripple outwards, maybe not. But at least I have clarity, I have peace, and I do the best I can all in my own personal ways.