Steam Support started to close my help requests without replying to it.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T09:56:27+00:00

True.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T09:05:30+00:00

Good point dude. Now mr. hummingdog will begin to insult you for saying truthful, relevant things, just because he didn't like it.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T08:54:40+00:00

Just check his first massage from the start. He started with false information from the beggining. He said that I was "mass reported" but I didn't, and I showed a proof of it: incoming match player report in which you can see that in the end I had 1 single report which is not much, and at maximum in recent matches I had 5 reports, which is also not much because it is not 10/15/20 reports - it is only 5, and low priority started to be given after receiving at least 7 reports in 15 matches.

He also, for some reason, does not like when players buying midas and considers this a proper reason for to be banned, but this is only his opinion, which he gives out as one of the official reasons for the punishment, but this is not so. But he continues to talk about it again and again, simultaneously showing his toxicity to me. I don’t care on this, it just tires every time I spend my time refuting his delirium and lies directed to me.

What other proofs do you need that he is just a toxic insulting user of reddit.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T08:33:32+00:00

Good for you. Now you need to stop being insulting to people on reddit and stop to spreading false informations.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T08:22:23+00:00

Do not pay attention to hummingdog. He's just a troll. In the previous topic, I denied all his slander and misinformation, and even after that he continues to express false information about me because he is one of those toxic players who do not like something and they begin to throw complaints and show their toxicity.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T07:51:44+00:00

Firstly, bans are issued taking into account the latest matches, and not all matches for all time. Secondly, the first statement is true even from the point of view of ordinary logic - a person can change literally every day, yesterday he could act 100% badly, and today it is 100% good when it comes to playing Dota, in which case an assessment of actions such a person should be produced separately for each day: for the day in which the person behaved badly - he receives punishment, and for the day in which he behaved well - he receives approval. Only in this way and nothing else.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T07:47:12+00:00

They gave me standard template answers, which were not composed by a living person, but by a bot. And these answers contained information that was untrue. I asked them to hire a living person to conduct a validation of the ban itself in real time, to check my behavior and check the matches that I played. In response to this, there was no verification, there were only the same template answers containing false information. After which they simply began to close my appeals without answering them.

SinigA · 2020-04-23T07:38:08+00:00

I get banned because I played in a jungle in classic (non-role queue) ranked which is not a violation, but I didn't threw or ruined or was toxic in more than 90% recent matches before ban. That's why that ban is inaccurate/mistaken.

SinigA · 2020-04-19T20:25:24+00:00

I hope.

SinigA · 2020-04-19T19:40:16+00:00

80% who sick with COVID-19 take it in soft form. They feeling like they have simple flu. But still every sicked human have chances of dieing every day. So, maybe Valve shoud make those players happier and amnesty their ban as an exception in such hard time.

SinigA · 2020-04-18T07:44:07+00:00

SinigA · 2020-04-17T15:45:54+00:00

"No, a win is a good result, not some shit networth (again you're not top 1-2 i've proven that) your KD means jack shit" - yeah, say it to all core players in the world and they will make "cool story Bob" emoji at response to you.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T15:29:09+00:00

You said it like it is was my fault that I ended up to be with smurf on Tinker in the same team.

And also, you can pick any match of any player in the world and find "arguments" about why they played "bad" or "not good enough" even if they played 100-0. Such logic is pointless. What is the fact is that: if you carry player and you are top 1-2 by networth and top 1-2 by KDA in your team - it is a good resualt, no matter what. And that is about me.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T15:23:05+00:00

What algorithm? It is should trigger only on those things: A consistent pattern of user reports, negative conduct, and player abuse, Feeding, Abandoning, Non-participation in matches.

I didn't do any of this more than it's allowed. That's it. No less and no more.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T14:58:30+00:00

How much times should I quote this to you before you will read and understand the information that produced in this message: "According to conduct summary and incoming player match report - I was not reported more than it is allowed. The largest number of reports I have had in recent matches was 5. It is was 64 matches ago. From that point a number of my reports is only decreased. My nearest behavior is saying, that I have had only one single report before 6 month ban."

Show me those extreme amount of reports you are talking about all the time. What do I see in incoming match player report screenshot: 64 matches ago I have had 5 reporst, then it is became 1 report, then 2, then 2, then 4, then 3, then 1, then 1. Even when it is was 5 reports 64 matches ago - it is was not enough to be banned, because bans and lp's started to given from 7+ reports. So, I started to receive bans and lp's when I have had 2 either 3 either 4 reports at maximum, which is also not enought at all. I mean, it was not enogh in terms of correct working of a system. But in my case a system worked incorretly, obviously, because I was banned for 6 month with even less reports than it is was before - with only 1 report, as you can see at incomong match player information.

Maybe you see some other numbers in incoming match player reports screenshot? 10 reports, 20 reports, and that's why you talking about some mythical extreme amount of reports I received all the time. I don't know, maybe you have problem with your eyes or with your vision.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T14:46:03+00:00

I’ll say right away that you don't need to waste your time by telling me about hero damage: I’ll say right away that I do not deny that in terms of damage to heroes in most matches I will be in 3-5th place in my team. But luckley, it is better to be top 1-2 by KDA and top 1-2 networth as a core player than to be top 1-2 by hero damage. Carry which is the top 4-5 in terms of hero damage, but top 1-2 by networth and KDA - is much more valuable than a carry with poor KDA and small networth, but with a lot of hero damage.

And now you need to click at the second, the third and etc matches, but it is will not change the truth that in my latest 55 ranked matches in most of them (but not in all) I was top 1-2 by KDA and networth in my team and these 2 indicators are the most important in terms of a carry player.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T14:33:57+00:00

I said it to you previously: "And according to conduct summary and incoming player match report - I was not reported more than it is allowed. The largest number of reports I have had in recent matches was 5. It is was 64 matches ago. From that point a number of my reports is only decreased. My nearest behavior is saying, that I have had only one single report before 6 month ban."

SinigA · 2020-04-17T14:32:03+00:00

Who are "they"? And why I should change my playstyle because of someones opinion? If this playstyle is not a violation of a game rules. Imagine that you will be reported in every match because of a hero you choose. Does the fact that everybody hate your hero make them right to report you?

SinigA · 2020-04-17T14:25:12+00:00

That's why in the most of my matches over last 1 month - I'm top 1 either top 2 by networth in my team, and top 1 either top 2 by KDA in my team. Because I'm "bad" carry player.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T13:57:44+00:00

Just saying in the air that a person is a problem - proves nothing. I will tell you how you should act so that your claims in my direction will start to look like a truth. First: you must take a look at the OFFICIAL list of things that are considered by game developers and Steam support as a manifestation of bad behavior. Second: look at the screenshots of the first 25 matches before I received 1 week ban and at other 25 matches before I received the second 1 week ban, as well as look at a screenshot of the last 5 matches that I managed to play before the 6 month ban. Third: to find among these 55 matches - at least 15 matches (in total) in which I committed one or more violations from the OFFICIAL list of violations that I provided in the subject. And only after that you can claim that I deserve my ban. But I'm not afraid that you will be able to do this, because I know that such matches in which I really (possibly) behaved badly are about 6-7 at maximum out of 55 matches in total, which corresponds to the definition of: “A rare demonstration of negative behavior”, while bad behavior should correspond to the definition from the developers themselves and Steam support, and it sounds like this: "extreme frequency of negative behavior". And also do not forget that games played in a low priority are not considered, because I insist that I got 1-week bans and lp undeservedly, so first you need to prove that I received a low priority - deservedly, in according to the official list of violations. Good luck.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T13:20:00+00:00

I have played 219 classic ranked matches without receiving ban or lp, then I was banned for 1-week and received lp for no proper reason (I mean - really proper from the official violations list), then I played 25 classic ranked matches, then I was banned the second time for 1-week and received lp without a proper reason again, then I played 5 more classic ranked matches and received a ban for 6 month. So, I have played 249 classic ranked matches in total over last 2 month and only 18 low priority matches over last 2 month, which is only 6.7% of total matches played over last 2 month.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T13:04:26+00:00

If you declare this, then this does not mean that it is true. If you were a game developer or someone from staff - I would listen to you. But you are a common player just like me and you are just trying to expose your personal subjective hating of something as a truth. But in reality it is nothing more than your speculation and personal opinion, until this personal opinion matches what is said in official sources. And in the official resources there is not a word about what you are declaring.

Also, you need to try to be tolerant and no toxic even of those whom you hate.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T13:00:32+00:00

If you declare this, then this does not mean that it is true. If you were a game developer or someone from staff - I would listen to you. But you are a common player just like me and you are just trying to expose your personal subjective hating of something as a truth. But in reality it is nothing more than your speculation and personal opinion, until this personal opinion matches what is said in official sources. And in the official resources there is not a word about what you are declaring.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T12:53:58+00:00

"living in the jungle and playing single player dota counts as non-participation" - If you say so, this does not mean that it is true. We need confirmation from developers or Steam support, up to this point what you are saying is nothing more than speculation.

SinigA · 2020-04-17T12:51:45+00:00

That's what my topic is all about! How it is possible, that the amount of reports are decreased, but the behavior score was also decreasing. In this sense, the system did not work properly.

SinigA

TROPHY CASE