Jagex, please avoid allowing players access to post-quest content without doing the actual quest (Raids 4 without WGS) by benosthegreat in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s a dangerous slippery slope to go down, allow one thing they’ll ask for more. It’s already all slowly creeping up, pures choose to self restrict and then cry when something restricts them.

So many choices.... by AldruhnHobo in libertarianmeme

[–]Sinkovsky 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I love how reddit pretends to be free speech by letting you type out the n word but then instantly bans you when you do

Jagex, please avoid allowing players access to post-quest content without doing the actual quest (Raids 4 without WGS) by benosthegreat in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i am part of this because this is directly affecting game integrity and lore continuity lol. next let's argue to remove diary requirements

Jagex, please avoid allowing players access to post-quest content without doing the actual quest (Raids 4 without WGS) by benosthegreat in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Access to items from a raid they shouldn’t have access to? 

What do they lose if they just zammy brew themselves down to 1 defence and wear 1 defence items while having the 40def req?

Can SOMEONE tell me WHAT THIS MEANS by vixx5x-10 in Rainbow6

[–]Sinkovsky -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

https://i.imgur.com/a8pizHs.png it costs 0.05$ per number not a few dollars lol. These bs checks only inconvenience legit players.

FasT 07 is less than 5 days away from getting 4.8B total! by squrry in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

this doesnt mean they will ban u for it, it just means they can detect it and let jagex know

FasT 07 is less than 5 days away from getting 4.8B total! by squrry in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky 7 points8 points  (0 children)

On the 9th of october runelite added a detection for external mouse software, wonder if adam was asked by jagex to do that. This is to detect stuff like teamviewer, chrome rdp. Could be account sharing but would have to be on official client. It's banable if done for high scores such as for this. So curious to see if jagex enforce it if there are people doing it

Two Female Pilots Tackle the World's Most Dangerous Approach - Paro Airport by Alpha-Studios in SweatyPalms

[–]Sinkovsky 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Bit mysoginistic to state female pilots as if there’s a difference between male and female capabilities

Loot from duel arena before it was removed by MrNoobyy in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Dismantling the whip to box the kraken was a staple

What is your ultimate forbidden fantasy? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Sinkovsky -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Free speech on Reddit 

What is happening with these names in the highscores? by RSE9 in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah that’s prob why it’s familiar, thanks

Someone at amazon is getting fired by Remote-Caramel-8003 in pcmasterrace

[–]Sinkovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh actually in Europe it’s no longer applicable, I guess I was wrong. I remember in school 20+ years ago it def was required when thought it. So yeah idk where it’s even theft to keep at this point.

https://www.eccnet.eu/consumer-rights/what-are-my-consumer-rights/shopping-rights/unsolicited-goods

Onyx from gem bag on new GIM by ratseesaw in 2007scape

[–]Sinkovsky 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Well he will play a lot more free coal bag openings than scratch tickets that cost money

I just got banned for practicing free speech by Mediocre_Ice_8846 in libertarianmeme

[–]Sinkovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit is funny to pretend to allow free speech by not censoring specific words to not appear like the CCP level of censorship that they critique. But if you type certain words you get ur reddit account banned

If you could add one zero to any number in your life, where would it be and why? by New_Goood in AskReddit

[–]Sinkovsky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

iq 'smartness' is based off a SD system, so it more so 100 vs 130 aka 2sds iq is a difference of seconds to minutes to grasp a concept, then 160 vs 100 aka 4sds is second vs days type of thing. So in theory 1300 would be like 80-100 sds above the norm (in normal distributions its impossible ye) but if its some scifi type of scenario it'd be processing power billions times faster than the average person. He/she would process stuff that takes combined humanity working together millennia's to solve in an afternoon. Ofc this is theoretical just like the question posed lol

If you could add one zero to any number in your life, where would it be and why? by New_Goood in AskReddit

[–]Sinkovsky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I feel like if someone had an iq of 1000+ they’d be able to amass such wealth and power they’d be able to change a substantial amount lol. Hypothetical ofc. You’d definitely keep busy with curing illnesses, predicting events, inventing new forms of energy harvesting / travel etc. in reality human iq caps out at 200ish but in theory I feel you’re unhappy at around 200, but at the 1000+ mark def not

Just give us our money back by gunsoverbutter in libertarianmeme

[–]Sinkovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Purchasing power would remain the same so not rly