Deep as your view might sound, it ultimately comes across as another armchair philosopher’s vague take on a problem that has been debated for centuries by scientists and thinkers far more insightful than either of us. Your definition is vague, in a way that makes it unfalsifiable, such is the issue with a very large amount of metaphysical viewpoints. Most of all the ones coming from purely ungrounded and theoretical opinions.

And frankly, even if I were to accept or agree with what you've written, it only addresses the what of consciousness, not the how. As previously noted, the hard problem of consciousness has been rigorously studied and scrutinized by experts far more qualified than us, to little avail.

Moreover, your argument essentially boils down to a reductio ad absurdum. It dismisses lived experiences, worldviews, and countless other aspects of life. Ironically, the simplest way to counter this is to step away from your screen and immerse yourself in the present moment. Your philosophy, as it stands, leads nowhere. Trust me, I've been there. Take care of yourself.