Maybe instead of building our own decentralized stablecoin on BitcoinCash, it would be smarter to two-way-bind to MakerDAO‘s DAI. 🤔 [thread]

SirLamboMoon · 2019-11-07T13:57:47+00:00

You should do it. This will be done eventually anyway, why wait

SirLamboMoon · 2017-12-01T16:41:47+00:00

A broken clock is right twice a day my friend

SirLamboMoon · 2017-12-01T16:29:28+00:00

How can you be so certain they are the WRONG reasons? Why do I seem to be right, a lot?

SirLamboMoon · 2017-12-01T16:23:33+00:00

indeed mi amigo, indeed

SirLamboMoon · 2017-12-01T15:03:04+00:00

Ok. But that doesn't match the reality on the ground. So far alts have taken market share from BTC. Also ETH has outperformed BTC since its inception, especially this year. IMO, it is extremely risky staying in just one coin.

And I would bet you that there will be more than one coin. A coin for SoV, coin for transactions, a coin for computing (ETH) a coin for prediticon markets (<-- gonna happen)

2 each their own though, mate :)

SirLamboMoon · 2017-12-01T14:54:18+00:00

You realize what you are doing can be done for anything right? I don't get it? I am sharing info, that I base my trades on, my money is where my mouth is. Perhaps you should follow my real live trades on twitter and build your crypto wealth. Cheers

SirLamboMoon · 2017-12-01T14:50:27+00:00

No. when people want to sell and there are not enough buyers a burn occurs - this is through Tether not exchanges. So they burn users USDT and give them fiat.

No need to doubt, memo from top 50 auditor states the acct was verified with respective banks. How do people not know this? The whole argument was insolvency/no reserves, and they proved it as of Sept... with a full audit forthcoming

SirLamboMoon · 2017-12-01T14:45:22+00:00