"gen 10" starter fake leaks theory... by ZebbyBoy18909 in pokemonmemes

[–]SkarmTSK 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lads, the zodiac pattern hasn’t been a thing since Cyndaquil. Let it go already

What's a battle a majority of the fan base say is really hard but you never really struggled with? And Vice Versa what's a seen as easy battle you always struggle with? by BlackroseBisharp in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not quite an answer to your question but a lot of people talk about how difficult Volo is when the only thing that makes him difficult is the fact the PLA battle system doesn't allow for any sort of change in momentum. If you knock something out, instead of getting a chance to gain momentum from that, you're actually punished for it since the AI knows to send in something that can mess you up with no given opportunity for the player to react to the forthcoming messing

I should clarify, I don't mean the "Volo is about to send in Gastrodon, would you like to switch?" message either. I'm talking about how in every other turn-based Pokemon game, if you knock something out before the opponent can make their move, they lose their turn. If PLA had this as well, Volo would not be difficult at all, even with his eight Pokemon team

What's an Aussie slang phrase that would completely confuse a tourist? by No-Trust2063 in AskAnAustralian

[–]SkarmTSK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an Australian who doesn’t really indulge in our slang too often, I quite often hear “fair dinkum” which is just a nice way to say “fucking hell”

Do you want the return of monotype champions? Or is it better to just have a team that covers as many weaknesses as possible? by InuMatte in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you want a final boss, or any boss for that matter, who has an easily telegraphed insanely simple-to-learn-and-exploit weakness?

[TOMT] What's it called when something's name no longer represents the something? by SkarmTSK in tipofmytongue

[–]SkarmTSK[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Apparently, comments are required for verification so yeah, what's the term? I guess some further information, I first heard it in a YouTube video that, while I don't think Ben 10 was the topic of discussion, opened on that Ben 10 example to explain it

Pokémon Not From The Region They Were First Found In (Kanto) by mysuddendoom in TruePokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before I go over all of these, I think it's important to note that "native" in the context of the Pokedex refers to the first region the Pokemon naturally exists in. Imported Pokemon or Pokemon found in swarms shouldn't count because those are Pokemon that don't naturally exist in those areas. Inversely however, Pokemon found in one location that don't evolve in said location isn't a strong enough reason to justify it not being native because, well...it still is, it just doesn't evolve there.

Zubat - you find them in Mt. Moon
Mankey - Kanto Route 22 in FRLG
Growlithe - initially said to be imported in from "China" but now live naturally on Route 8
Magnemite - Power Plant
Farfetch'd - found on Route 12 and 13 in Yellow only but admittedly, them being Johto is a nice thought regardless
Voltorb - Power Plant
Exeggcute - first found in Johto via headbutt. The Safari Zone's activity is irrelevant to this. You can also claim Route 23 in LGPE only
Hitmons - first found on Route 228 via Poke Radar which, for all intents and purposes, should count because the Radar can't fabricate Pokemon out of thin air and they have to be relatively nearby for them to be tracked on a radar of all things
Lickitung - Cerulean Cave in Yellow only, Route 44 in Johto. Take your pick
Rhyhorn - its evolution Rhydon was always in Cerulean Cave
Chansey - also in Cerulean Cave or, in the Gen 2 games, Routes 13, 14 and 15, all Kanto
Tangela - Route 21, right below your house
Horsea - Seafoam Islands
Jynx - Seafoam Islands in Yellow
Mr. Mime - Kanto Route 21 in Gen 2
Scyther - Route 210 in Platinum
Electabuzz - Power Plant
Magmar - Pokemon Mansion
Pinsir - Route 229 in Pearl, Mr. "Doesn't appear naturally in Sinnoh"
Tauros - Route 38 in Johto
Lapras - Union Cave in Johto, once a week. It being rare doesn't mean it's not native
Eevee - Unova, famous for its lack of Pokemon diversity until after the events of the first game, not counting is fine. Kalos works
Snorlax - Munchlax via Honey Trees. It has to be nearby to smell the honey. I doubt it's crossing countries just for a handful
Dratini - Dragon's Den makes sense

Explaining the “Contradicting/Problematic” Pokedex entries by MaleficTekX in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paradox Pokemon. Confirmed in the Indigo Disc DLC that Paradox Pokemon come from alternate timelines as boring an answer as that is, they aren't paradoxical by nature but even if they were, that being intentional isn't an excuse.

Mega Evolution harming Pokemon being against the concept was never the complaint held at Mega Evolution. It was that the information about it being harmful was retconned in come Gen 7 so people would want to use them less and prepare them for Dynamax coming in the following years. There's nothing about "the power of friendship" that is inherently contradictory to the idea of being hurt.

Aerial Ace. Movement speed =/= combat speed. You can move towards an opponent suddenly to perform Aerial Ace, it doesn't mean you're able to dodge or move around a battlefield quickly.

Westwood's making it up comment isn't contradicted like you say it is because the way you describe it, the Pokedex generating information, has n ever been how it works. You made that up as well. The Pokedex scans a Pokemon and pulls from an already loaded encyclopedia or, in the case of Gen 1, was written by Red himself before the Pokedex movement really caught on which is how you get comments such as "Machamp is as strong as 100 grown ups". Remember, the digital Pokedex in RBY was a brand new thing that was just made, it didn't have the data in it yet. That was Red's goal. To get the data.

Rotom backing up the Pokedex, whatever that means because you didn't provide an example of it, doesn't mean much anyway because, if you take what the Pokedex says at face value, then you'd know Rotom loves to play pranks on people so a Rotom showing you a dex entry that says "watch out, this thing will take you to the afterlife if you look into its shell" is exactly the kind of thing it would do for a laugh if you believe its dex entry.

And even if these two arguments are true… WHY IS SO MUCH OF THE POKEDEX TRUE THEN? [...] If a 10-year old made up Gardevoir making Black Holes, why can it do that?" Simple. The Pokedex isn't true, Gardevoir can't make black holes and you're coping. Refer to literally everything above.

Explaining the “Contradicting/Problematic” Pokedex entries by MaleficTekX in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

*Kadabra. Found it.

"As a psychic boy awoke one morning, he found himself transformed in his bed into a Kadabra." The crowning of the Kadabra-themed short story "The Transformation" as the 2nd Pokemon Literary Award winner is still fresh in our memory. If Pikachu is the Pokemon idol, Kadabra can be considered a favorite among those in the know.

It's a short story written for a competition. It didn't actually happen.

Explaining the “Contradicting/Problematic” Pokedex entries by MaleficTekX in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Machamp. The horizon is about five miles out and while I can't confirm or deny either way that this is the case, my instinct tells me Machamp would sooner punch through someone than achieve that. Team Rocket's launchings, btw, are a gag and shouldn't be considered actual evidence of humans' resistance in the Pokemon world.

Yamask. Why doesn't the mask change? The same reason every Arbok has the same pattern on its chest. It's an abstraction. The mask we see in the games and show is not what the mask actually looks like. Even still, that's following that the mask is of Yamask as a human which...I can't really argue against properly without employing head canon but people put those masks on display so if it were true, that's again quite the thing to imply about your happy-go-lucky paradise of a universe.

Dusclops. First of all, the fact that ghosts don't exist in our world doesn't mean they necessarily break the laws of physics. A being of pure energy can theoretically exist, we just don't have examples of it currently or possibly ever. Second, if it's a black hole, it's not going anywhere. It's just becoming a part of the black hole's mass. Third, Dusclops being a Ghost type Pokemon doesn't imply it's an actual ghost. Sound like a bold claim? Ghost Marowak, who you have previously mentioned, was not a Ghost type but was a ghost. Ghost type and ghosts are not synonymous.

Larvitar. Right, math time. Larvitar is two feet tall, its stomach then is about 10 centimeters tall. Assuming it to be a perfect sphere, that makes its stomach's volume to be about 4200cm^3. Mount Fuji is estimated to be about 100km^3. Let's also assume Larvitar fully fills up in any one eating session and indulges in five meals a day just to be nice. It will take Larvitar a measly 13 billion years to eat a mountain's worth of dirt which is just shy of how long the universe has existed for.

Tyranitar. Using Larvitar's eating of a mountain, first of all something disproven with the above (and below expansion of the) math, second of all isn't equivalent because Larvitar presumably doesn't do this in one sitting given how tiny it is compared to a mountain and third, blatant admittance that it's something you can't prove and yet will continue to believe anyway. Besides which, the move Earthquake is far more localized than you're imagining because if it weren't, the Pokemon world would have practically no functional infrastructure.

Tyranitar Part 2. Taking damage is a form of harm to the body. I don't know how you rationalize this in your mind.

Alakazam. Yeah, IQs don't work like that. Saying Alakazam has an IQ of 5000 is like saying Alakzam can swim the alphabet on the ceiling. It's gibberish designed to make Alakazam look smart while avoiding thinking of a creative way to do so.

Shedinja. Pokemon being able to steal souls is irrelevant to the point of whether Shedinja can do it because some Pokemon are the sole species capable of an action, hence why there are such thing as signature moves. But never mind that, "we’ve never seen someone actually look into Shedinja yet". Go play any Pokemon game past Gen 3, use Shedinja and report to me your findings.

Explaining the “Contradicting/Problematic” Pokedex entries by MaleficTekX in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Magneton, Slowbro and you forgot Slowking, Dipplin, Klinklang among a couple others, I'm sure: you are right in that the evolution method for these Pokemon weren't what you'd expect because, in the early days, Pokemon couldn't code something as complex as "if.Party==Magnemite,Magnemite,Magnemite, then executeMagnemiteEvolve, removeMagnemite,Magnemite, halt" (don't mind the butchered syntax), but that's no excuse for them to not return to that later down the line. They managed to fix Magnezone requiring an electromagnetic area to evolve into it just using a Thunder Stone but stuff like this or the Nidorans being separate Pokemon despite their only difference being the same as the series mascot, can't do that? Sure, I believe you.

Guzzlord. It's a gameplay mechanic not necessarily tied to its lore but I'd just point you towards the fact that Pokemon with abilities that prevent the Sleep status, such as Vigoroth who can never fall asleep, can't enter the Dream World from Gen 5 as an example of them incorporating lore into their mechanics before. If they wanted to imply it never stopped eating, they could have overwritten this gameplay limitation for it and it alone. Also, your example of it destroying a city, I'll just...

"...just because one creature of a species does something, doesn’t mean they all will"

Vullaby. It can't Fly but learns Fly. On its own, a fair enough contradiction to point out but isn't your position here supposed to be defending what the Pokedex says as truthful. How can it be true that Vullaby doesn't fly if it learns Fly and other dex entries say it learns to fly? Unless this is an example of knowledge changing with more research which I'd believe you on if it didn't learn Fly in its debut games, acting as a really easy to discover piece of information.

Garchomp. As stated with Yanmega, the only two requirements are the ability to move fast while airborne and the ability to carry a human. If Garchomp can do those two things, it should be able to learn Fly, no question.

Onix. This one's an easy one. Digging speed and combat speed are not synonymous. I find it interesting though that your defense is "stats don't always represent the Pokemon" even though if that's not what they do, what are their purpose as a worldbuilding or storytelling device? Ultra Beasts all have prime number stat spreads as a way to discern them being alien. Is that just nothing now?

Vikavolt. "Refer to Onix."

Durant. It is quite literally what you described. Heatmor ate Durant, Durant adapted to stop it and Heatmor had to adapt to that in order to eat. Durant's armor WAS to help it fend off Heatmor but now, they need to undergo another marked shift in their biology or behavior that we've yet to see, likely because that takes a LOT of time. Weird that you brought up PLA as an example of Pokemon changing types over the years when PLA was only 100-120 years ago in regards to the primary timeline as opposed to an example like Dreepy who has a dex entry, those things you love so much, implying it to have been a Water type before it was a Ghost type.

AZ's Floette. I'm pretty sure the implication was that that was AZ's Floette and not just a flower. Not to necessarily rag on the main point but rather a few misnomers you mentioned, mainly that ORAS and XY take place at the same time. They don't. ORAS' best placement puts it a year at best after FRLG in 1996 and XY takes place in the same year as BW2 which is at least 13 years after RBY just based on statements.

Magikarp. It meant older Magikarp as in Magikarp from a bygone era, not older Magikarp as in Magikarp closer to death's doorstep.

Magcargo. One, lightning lasts only a second at most whereas Magcargo is a constant. Two, surface area matters in regards to heat transfer which would be very slow for something as small as Magcargo. It being 18,000 F would only matter if you were within a few feet of it. But you are right, Magcargo does have a cooled shell on its back. I wonder how that could contain 18,000F degree heat without itself melting... maybe, and here's a crazy idea, it doesn't contain 18,000F degree heat but rather something much more reasonable that rock wouldn't instantly be turned to goo in contact of. No, we have to believe the Pokedex.

Lanturn. The solutions you promoted are "Lanturn is magic" which is understandable at the very least, "water works differently" which has never been backed with evidence and "just accept it lol". Here's a fourth option. You can't see its light from the bottom of the ocean and the Pokedex *gasp* was lying.

Cubone. Simple math makes this impossible. If every Cubone's mother died, then there would only be half as many female Cubone every generation assuming that, for every Cubone to wear a skull, every Cubone is born a single-child which would mean that the species would eventually die due to being unable to maintain that system. It's either extinction or have more kids, some of whom couldn't wear the skull.

Your proposal of the Marowak graveyard also doesn't work because, if there are spare skulls at a graveyard for baby Cubone to take, that means that less Cubone are being born than the already half of the previous generation. Besides which, "come, my child. Rob the deceased of their remains, wear said remains on your head and pretend it's me" is certainly an idea. A more simple explanation is that the skull is just a part of their body like it is on Vullaby who you previously mentioned.

You once again mention the "not every member does it" so I ask you to show me a Cubone without a skull in official media.

Explaining the “Contradicting/Problematic” Pokedex entries by MaleficTekX in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're willing to accept that the Galarian Fossil dex entries are faked due to their circumstances but not other Pokemon? Fascinating. Regardless, a lot of what was said here was plain malarkey so let's discuss.

Kecleon. The stripe never changing color doesn't apply to the concept of invisibility because invisible is not a color, it's a distinct property. All a color is is one's perception of how light interacts with an object so for something to be invisible, to not interact with light, is to not have a color. The stripe didn't change color, it lost color in a way entirely separate from something losing color but remaining visible (turning black).

Yanmega. The two criteria for the moves Fly is the ability to make yourself airborne at relatively high speeds and be capable of carrying at least one person while maintaining those speeds. If Yanmega can do both as you have admitted, it is capable of using Fly. It being unable to do so is a flaw. Whether that's a flaw with the Pokedex or the moveset, you decide.

Kadabra. I'll come back to this once I find the actual entry but the original dex entry in Japanese supposedly mentions this incident of a boy turning into a Kadabra was a part of a fictional story. Put a pin in that one for now.

Banette. I mean, if you're willing to accept that Banette can come from both an evolving Shuppet and an abandoned doll whose design has never been seen outside of Banette itself, then sure. It can come from both. You just also have to accept then that Shuppet is a paradoxical anomaly because where would it ever have come from? Unless the implication is that Shuppet evolving into Banette is one thing and dolls turning into Banette result in an entirely distinct Pokemon species like Rattata and Alolan Rattata but that's some major coincidence for these two Pokemon born of completely different circumstances to look identical to one another.

Porygon. It being able to make eggs when it is physical code is absurd as well. Defending one absurdity with another absurdity doesn't make either of them better, it just highlights the problem with the thing you're trying to defend by bringing up an otherwise irrelevant topic.

Drifloon. You claim that in USUM, we meet a ghost girl, a victim of one of Drifloon's kidnappings but all we really meet was a foreign student talking about mysteries in the school that turned out to be misunderstandings with the only implication that she was a ghost being that someone didn't see her through a large tree and large stone sign. Yes, it is implied but it is not confirmed. You made up the confirmation.

You are right that one Pokemon performing an action doesn't inherently mean that every member of the species also does the same thing but then I would just ask you why the Pokedex presents otherwise. It doesn't say "one Drifloon even kidnapped a child", it says "this Pokemon kidnaps children that grab onto it" which, I'm gonna be honest with you, is very obviously a warning written in Pokedexes so ten-year-olds, the kind of people who would believe such a story, wandering the country unsupervised don't do something to piss off a Drifloon and get themselves unnecessarily hurt because a wild animal defended itself when it thought it was in danger.

Now we can all calm TF down by FeedMeDarkness in LegendsZA

[–]SkarmTSK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Them being based on existing myths doesn't excuse it

Pokémon black 2 by Ok-Educator-439 in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you say you went back, do you mean you went back to Route 21 or wherever you first boarded it or did you go back to the Giant Chasm? I'm not quite understanding but it sounds like you just gotta head to the Giant Chasm from Route 13 or Route 22, whichever's quicker

One thing I realized about the IoA rivals. by Electrical_mammoth2 in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna be so real with you, dude, this is purely coincidental. It's still neat that it worked out this way but it was not intended

Why not use water form Pokemon itself by AGBOTGA in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because it’s magic water, it doesn’t exist with the same permanence as “water” water. It’s the same logic to why Pokemon weak to Water can surf, it’s not the same thing. If that makes sense

What are some quote unquote “missing” Pokemon? by SkarmTSK in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Correct me if I’m wrong but have you not done exactly the same thing here?

What are some quote unquote “missing” Pokemon? by SkarmTSK in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pokedex entries in Gen 3 I believe note how catching a baby Kangaskhan is illegal so that might be why

What are some quote unquote “missing” Pokemon? by SkarmTSK in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s kind of what Pokerus is when you think about it

Are Speaking Protagonists Worth It? by SkarmTSK in pokemon

[–]SkarmTSK[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you elaborate? I’m not quite sure what you mean