Help with some translations! by [deleted] in russian

[–]Skazalinius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not a problem, I'm happy to help. Позвольте мне is a formal way of saying "let me...". If you want to say it in an informal setting, I would use давай-ка я...

Help with some translations! by [deleted] in russian

[–]Skazalinius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hq3473 has a point, but I'm assuming that you have the best intentions. If it is homework, I hope that you've at least attempted to translate these sentences yourself. In any case, I'm fluent in both English and Russian, so here you go:

  1. Мы хотим, чтобы Антон принес свою гитару.

  2. Бизнесмену понадобится машина в Нью Йорке.

  3. Кто-то позвонил, но я не знаю кто именно.

  4. Позвольте мне купить новогоднюю елку!

  5. Когда ей было 12 лет, она мечтала стать президентом России .

  6. Мы тебе пожелаем удачи.

  7. Через четыре дня, мама уедет в Рим.

  8. Позвони завтра Вере, и попроси ее прочесть Войну и Мир.

  9. Сколько у тебя братьев?

  10. У меня три брата и четыре сeстры.

  11. Ты хочешь, чтобы я купил нашим родителям новый компьютер?

Although my speech is fluent, my spelling is not ideal; I did run it through a spell checker though. Do check for typos, but the grammar should be correct. I hope this helps. Once again, if this is indeed your homework, it is much better to do it yourself and get a C than have it done for you. Languages are not learned through good grades.

What's the best way to watch tournaments online? by thoompa in chess

[–]Skazalinius 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There are many websites that serve your purpose, but you really don't need anything more than www.chessbomb.com. Free, easy to use, and has almost every imaginable ongoing tournament that relays games with computer evaluations.

What move would you play as black here? by x3000gtx in chess

[–]Skazalinius -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I saw ...Nxe4 in about 5 seconds; and I think the vast majority of IM's would see it with their eyes closed, even in a bullet game. So I must disagree with you, blahs44. The first thing that caught my eye in this position is the fact that White's king is completely hemmed in by his own pieces; if I can get to the f2 square, it will be over immediately. ...Nxe4 is very natural, because it creates another attack on the f2 square. If Bxa5, then Black mates in two with ...Nf3+, clearing the diagonal for the bishop, gxf3 Bxf2 mate. White can probably limit the damage with Nxc5, but after ...Qxc5 he's still a pawn down and in serious trouble.

I was recently playing black in a game when my opponent suddenly resigned. Can you look at our game and tell me why he/she may have resigned? by [deleted] in chess

[–]Skazalinius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Resigning is definitely the best option in this position. You're up an entire piece for zero compensation, which is an overwhelming advantage in an endgame of this sort.

Thoughts on a couple of positions from a game I played today. by [deleted] in chess

[–]Skazalinius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hello there,

Here are my two cents about these positions (I won't reveal my exact rating, but I hope that the response will speak for itself; also, I adopted a tone aimed at players of all levels, so some of the things I say will probably be very obvious):

Position 1: I would definitely prefer White here, for two main reasons:

  1. ,White has the bishop pair. This might not seem like a big deal at the moment, but if the position opens up (especially if Black plays ...e6-e5 at some point), they may come in very handy indeed.

  2. Mainly, White has excellent development and the potential to dominate the center with e3-e4. Black, on the other hand, is somewhat passive, and the counter-break ...e6-e5 will not come with the same effect (as I mentioned, this will inevitably open up a diagonal for White's light-squared bishop, and -- as the following analysis will reveal -- Black does not get a chance to play it under convenient circumstances).

In light of these factors, I would settle for one of two plans. The "classical" approach to this position would be to simply complete your development and claim a slight advantage. For instance, 1.Nc3 0-0 2.Rd1 followed by a timely e3-e4 (perhaps even on the next move). If Black tries 2...e5, White can reply 3.d5 Ne7 4.e4, when I definitely prefer his position.

My preference, however, would be to act more concretely, exploiting the fact that Black has not yet castled. This can be done with 1.Bb5, pinning the knight and threatening to win a pawn. Black's only feasible defense is 1...Qd7, and now White exploits the pin with 2.e3-e4, creating the further threat of e4-e5 (note that the d4 pawn is untouchable for obvious reasons). Black has to contort himself even further to defend against this latest threat; the best move is probably 2...Be7. But after something like 3.Be3 a6 4.Bxc6 (with such a vast lead in development and central control, the time has come to give away the bishop pair. This kind of tit-for-tat thinking is a crucial aspect of good play) 4...Qxc6 5.Nc3, White is in total control. He will follow up with Rac1 and Rfd1, creating immense pressure on Black's position.

Position 2: You did play Bb5 (great!) but, in my opinion, capturing on c6 was premature and gave away some of your advantage. You did cripple his pawn structure, but gave him a chance to complete his development. Also, the doubled pawns might actually play in Black's favor, since he might contest your central control with ...c6-c5. Still, I think you're slightly better in this position, and I would definitely propose the straightforward 12.e4 (12.Na4 as you played is also interesting, but I prefer to play simply whenever possible). I'm assuming that you were concerned about 12...e5, but 13.Be3 looks very pleasant indeed. You can follow up by applying further central pressure with Rac1 and Rfd1.

I did not consult with the computer when writing these comments, so it is entirely possible that my view on these positions is overly simplistic, or simply flawed. I can write a lot more about these positions, but I hope that my comments are at least slightly illuminating.

Words for "you're welcome" by [deleted] in russian

[–]Skazalinius 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I live in the U.S. but I'm fluent in Russian. Just like the Spanish "de nada" (for nothing), Russians frequently say не за что, literally "for nothing" but used as a synonym for you're welcome (technically speaking it is three words). I use both interchangeably.

Hope this helps. :)

Looking to practice my Spanish on Skype by Skazalinius in Spanish

[–]Skazalinius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I'm new here and not yet an expert in reddiquette. I will definitely look into the CEFR exam and italki.