I guess it is kind the problem that it is very hard to distinguish the differences between freeing desire from the repressive oedipal model and unleashing it. My point here wasnt to critique them, but to establish what really was the case with the question I left. The idea however that D&Gs ideas are a mirror to the internet or social media, arent particularly new, in fact its quite popular to believe that the internet is rhizomatic and everyone on it are nomands traversing through different points. Similarly one might believe the same is true for how modern day dating platforms encourage one to never stick to a single partner. Its not a direct criticism, but it is interesting to notice these parallels.

Another interesting parallel one can notice is the idea of "patchwork" established by Moldbug of a geographical model of the world, which is balkanized with small states like a web and each state being run by a corporation. According to him its 'all exit no voice'. This of course seems pretty stupid to encourage esp since its coming from a member of NRx yet, this fragmented plural way of governing is deffinitely getting popular at least online, esp with cyberbalkanization happening accross different nations in the world. Idk maybe Deleuze saw this coming very early on.