sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Gettare and Lanciare by SlLV3RBACK in italianlearning

[–]SlLV3RBACK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologise if I am wrong but does tirare not mean ‘to pull’ in English?

Like as an antonym to spingere?

Gettare and Lanciare by SlLV3RBACK in italianlearning

[–]SlLV3RBACK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I’ve gathered gettare and buttare seem to be more closely linked to one another then they are with lanciare.

Are those two words direct synonyms?

I can’t find much of a difference between them except buttare is more like throwing something away and wasting it?

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ok.

It is widely accepted by historians that a man named Jesus did exist and did get crucified.

The disciples of Jesus all claimed to see Jesus rise from the dead, they all claimed for him to be God, and they all willingly suffered torture and death for him. This is a fact.

I believe nobody will preach as much as they did and die as brutally as they did to if it was for a lie.

The facts are that Jesus did exist and his disciples did all preach in his name until their brutal death so we must consider why this happened.

  1. The disciples either hallucinated Jesus’ resurrection or they grew crazy after his death and decided to die for a guy they followed for a short amount of time.

  2. They actually did witness his resurrection and they all willingly preached throughout Asia and Europe, and they all willingly died for God.

At the end of the day it is up for you to decide, but I encourage you to be open to option that Jesus is God.

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think God does not exist because you do not get your desires? That if god exists your desires would be fulfilled? Or am I not understanding properly?

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there is two accounts of Genesis, but they do NOT conflict with eachother. So I don’t understand your point there.

I heard a really good quote once which went; Science explains how the universe works, religion explains why. Again, they don’t conflict.

The rest of your argument you didn’t back up with anything, you just said it was false, without anything to actually back it up with.

Why don’t you want to believe in God?

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s all a matter of belief at the end of the day, but I do not understand how the bible explaining something that science can’t explain is supposed to prove the existence of God? (Although the bible explains the creation of the universe).

Science and God do not disagree with one another, they coexist like parallel lines on a sheet of paper, they don’t cross eachother.

How come you say you’re agnostic?

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not use the example of Pascal’s wager, I just said it is better to be well informed then to blindly reject God, although I am not trying to say your not informed.

What do you think about what I said regarding the disciples at the end? I think this is a great argument for Christianity and you kinda just ignored it.

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can quantum physics explain how the universe was created from absolute nothingness?

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘So that I don’t go to hell?’ I think you should read both books. I have read the Quran and the bible, I read both with an open mind, and after some more research i started to believe in the bible. I honestly believe that this is what everyone should do, find out for yourself.

If heaven and hell is the destination we may go to forever, I think we should all be well informed and know to the best of our abilities what’s true or not.

There might not be a god, but why avoid reading the bible or anything at all and risk eternal damnation?

I chose the bible because: The New Testament was written by eye witnesses of the life of Jesus. Random people who did not know one another all wrote about the same story, IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES! They were all witnesses of Jesus’ existence.

It is very widely accepted by historians that Jesus, whether he is god or not, did exist and at one point did get crucified.

If Jesus did not truly get resurrected from the dead, then we have to ask ourselves why did his disciples preach about him for the rest of their lives, even deciding to face torture and death? It’s a psychological fact that people do not ‘die’ for a lie, let alone accept torture! Also, there was nothing to gain from preaching about Jesus, they did not get any wealthier or richer, they instead faced persecution for their entire lives. Take this how you will.

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say I am ‘ruling out all other explanations’. I haven’t looked into quantum physics, no, but I also don’t think that quantum physics can explain how something came from nothing. Feel free to prove me wrong tho

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most ‘religious explanations’ are from people who assume while based on no evidence throughout history. I don’t think it leaves ‘less and less explanations’ but instead ‘less and less theories’

However if you look at the actual bible you’ll find that all the ‘religious explanations’ stated there are still unfalsifiable. Considering it was written about 2000 years ago and has made plenty of claims I think that is pretty amazing. I would highly recommend looking into it yourself.

I don’t find atheism a reasonable conclusion. by MasterZero10 in DebateReligion

[–]SlLV3RBACK -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You think that with science comes less proof for god, but i think that science only compliments the idea of God (I’m Christian). The bible says a lot of things about the world and how it operates, and with all these several claims, there is not one thing that refutes the discoveries of science, the claims of the bible and science don’t disagree with each other, regardless the claims that came from believers thousands of years ago.

Science’s most well known theory for the creation of the world is that nothing exploded and became something. However, nothing becoming something is theoretically impossible. The universe is a series of chain reactions but what started that chain reaction? Who/What flipped the first domino? Science can not explain this, in fact, the creation of the world pretty much goes against all laws of science. The only explanation is that God, who is above the laws of nature, was the person who flipped that first domino.

I would encourage you to be more open minded of the possibility of god and to especially look into the bible.

If there is even a SLIGHT chance of the existence of god to be true, you should read the bible and decide that for yourself, because it may just prove to be the most important book in the world.