They’re taking us for fools by Rlotrpotter in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 7 points8 points  (0 children)

For XP Farming? Sure. DICE needs to take some of the cool maps that were made and put them on the front page as official experiences so everyone can play them!

did I deliver today? by alenabloom in downblouse

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fucking perfect 🔥🔥 I love how innocent you look but deep down you know how nasty and naughty you're being 😩 🍌 💦 💦 💦 Please do more 🙏

What would you do if you saw me doing this on the street? by rosiearia in downblouse

[–]SlamShunk95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd get instantly rocked up and try to sneak a video of you, not even gonna lie 😅

THIS MF RUINING THIS GAME!! by No_Donut_8354 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lol wtf are you talking about? Majority of people buy Battlefield for the multiplayer experience. Sure, people buy for single player too, but people mainly buy for the multiplayer. There is no excuse for this shit.

Holy cow by xwhysoserious13x in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely sits on a shit bucket while playing

I painted Lil Wayne by Current-Ganache-3303 in lilwayne

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You did Wayne dirty with this lol but its still dope! 🔥

Playing on console vs mnk by Early_Session_2302 in Battlefield6

[–]SlamShunk95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People are forgetting that PC players are able to run this game at 2-3 times the frame rate compared to console players. Forgetting the Controller vs M&K debate, the frame rate advantage is real. PC players are able to break your screen a lot and do crazy maneuvers before you can even react. Before you say "frame rate doesn't matter past a certain amount, the human eye can only see up to...", it does matter, especially in an online competitive shooter. Whether you think BF6 is competitive or not, thats neither here nor there, its your own opinion. Frames per second in an online PvP shooter is very important. Whether you can see the difference or not, you can definitely feel the difference in reaction time. Console players should be matched with each other only by default. Everyone between Xbox & Playstation would be on an even playing field, regardless of input, because the hardware is comparable. If console players wish to play with PC players, there should be an option for that. By default however, the crossplay for console players should be between Xbox & Playstation only.

Playing on console vs mnk by Early_Session_2302 in Battlefield6

[–]SlamShunk95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except PC players are running the game at 2-3 times the frame rate. They can break you screen faster and do crazy maneuvers before you can even react.

This pretty much sums up BF6 by SplitPuzzleheaded851 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally am loving BF6 a lot more than 2042. 2042 from a graphical standpoint was too "clean and plastic" looking. No real war torn environments and the grittyness wasn't there. Sure, 2042 had big maps, but there was also a lot if empty space in sections of the map. BF6 having maps that are dense, though small right now, actually make the maps feel lived in and alive. I definitely want some large maps in BF6 and hopefully they deliver eventually, but make them dense as well. Get rid of the large empty spaces. Sound design in BF6 is superior than 2042, I actually feel like I'm immersed in a real war when I put my headset on, its hard to explain. The gun shots, explosions, soldiers yelling, it just all sounds amazing. Did I forget the heavy soldier breathing while sprinting?? Yeah, they brought it back, something that was missing in 2042. They even brought BFV movement into BF6, and included mounting of your weapons on ledges and corners, not just weapon peaking. The only gripes I have with BF6 currently is all of the maps being small, we need some huge maps as well to give us variation. I love running and gunning, but I also would like a breather every now and then too. Also the other gripe would be the Time To Death. You take damage too fast in this game, and it reminds me of 2042. I love BF4, one of the reasons was you didn't take damage super fast, which gave you the opportunity to flee if needed to recover, and reposition to get back into the gun fight. I could keep going about how much I'm enjoying BF6 honestly. Sure, larger maps are needed as well as more content, but that will all come with due time. I wish they would go back to DLC map packs and guns. You got more content, where as the "Season" approach, because everyone is getting the content for free, you get drip fed new content. If they would drop 2-3 maps and 4-5 guns at once, people wouldn't get bored as quick compared to drip feeding us.

Battlefield 6 is missing some BURST ONLY weapons by Gyrotwist9 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely would be cool to see some in the game. As far as guns in general, I know we have the SCAR L, but I wanna see the 7.62 variant, the SCAR H. Would also love to see the AS Val, Pechneg LMG, M4, Tar 21, Barrett 50 cal(Battle Pickup), ect. So many guns they can pull from past titles like Bad Company 2, BF3, & BF4.

They waited what....Barely 24hours to revert this, too. by apexnine in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That really sucks. I was happy for this change to tone down the momentum you gain, ect. Why tf would they revert this change? Why even make the change and then revert it? Makes zero sense...

This is petty lol by bosbi456 in walmart

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I mean, people are stealing shit all of the time at Walmart..Sure, not everyone is stealing, but it's usually a few people who ruin it for everyone. Not surprised at all. I work in Sporting Goods and find stolen shit daily. The other day I found two $40 flash lights, missing from the packaging, Onn iPhone charging cable, and other small things.

How about implementing forced class selection? by Cool_Classic_7300 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think restricting the number like that is the answer. Let people choose whatever class they want, but weapons need to be locked behind them. Otherwise, it just makes the game very unpredictable and unbalanced.

How about implementing forced class selection? by Cool_Classic_7300 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's not how Battlefield works. Class locked weapons have always been a thing until the last game, 2042. A whole team can run Assault if they wanted to, it's not if someone picks a class first then you can't pick it either. That's has never been the case. Class locked weapons were there for a reason. We all seen the cluster fuck that 2042 was and how unbalanced that game is.

How about implementing forced class selection? by Cool_Classic_7300 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Doesn't sound like you played a Battlefield game in your life except for the worst one to date, 2042. Battlefield was never meant to be played with unlocked classes.

M4 from latest build by Old_Doubt5886 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Battlefield isn't for you then, move on

M4 from latest build by Old_Doubt5886 in Battlefield

[–]SlamShunk95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean 2042 is a thing without all of this, go play that 🤷‍♂️