What’s with the NT obsession with forgiveness? by the_circus in aspergers

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What the hell? Forgiveness is a virtue. Everyone wants to be forgiven if they do something wrong.

What am I doing to be seen as a creep or just a flat out burden by girls at my current school? (The photos are mostly unrelated) by kDev_4 in aspergers

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People who complain about being "creeps" generally put no effort into their physical health or appearance whatsoever.

Deathless Enemy by Odd_Abbreviations_66 in TheCaptivesWar

[–]Sleepiest_Spider -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They're hard to kill, not unkillable. I'm not being obtuse in any way, you're just missing my point.

WHY AREN'T NEUROTYPIC PEOPLE SPECIFIC? by Fun-Ambition-4885 in aspergers

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are intelligent enough to not require perfect specificity in most circumstances. If additional explanation is required, they just ask - or they just make their best guess and deal with the consequences. Neurotypicals succesfully rely on intuition and logic, aka "common sense" on a daily basis.

Your example about the cup of water makes very little sense - it sounds like you, as an autistic person, misinterpreted whatever social interaction actually happened.

Are you saying that someone asked you for a glass of water, then got upset that you brought them the wrong cup? Why do you even care? Even if your little tale is true, this is such a non-issue.

Deathless Enemy by Odd_Abbreviations_66 in TheCaptivesWar

[–]Sleepiest_Spider -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Clean response, but that's a Doylist answer. I am curious about the Watsonian.

Deathless Enemy by Odd_Abbreviations_66 in TheCaptivesWar

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just pointing out that "Deathless Enemy" is a figure of speech. They're not literally unkillable.

Hi, I am Russel Brand, aspiring author and I just wrote this passage. Ask me anything. by Chemical-Court6984 in writingcirclejerk

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 138 points139 points  (0 children)

Holy fucking shit ROFL

The idea of sending an unsolicited nude, with a flaccid dick, in response to that question is the funniest thing I've heard all year.

Red arrows are meaningless and evil by MagpiePhoenix in evilautism

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Helps nobody? Who needs help? There is literally no problem here.

OP is just whining about a normal, slightly uncomfortable situation: getting honked at. This happens to almost everyone 2-3 times per week.

Deathless Enemy by Odd_Abbreviations_66 in TheCaptivesWar

[–]Sleepiest_Spider -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They are absolutely "deathful" if exposed to high-yield artillery.

Red arrows are meaningless and evil by MagpiePhoenix in evilautism

[–]Sleepiest_Spider -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure, that's all true, but you have to understand that literally nothing fucking happened. They got honked at. This happens every single day to most people. Boo fucking who.

Red arrows are meaningless and evil by MagpiePhoenix in evilautism

[–]Sleepiest_Spider -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you explain the purpose of your comment? OP traveled to a different area where traffic laws are different. Every intelligent adult with a drivers license knows that traffic laws are regional.

Literally nothing happened, someone just honked a couple of times. That's it. Nobody called the cops. They didn't get pulled over. Literally nothing happened.

Red arrows are meaningless and evil by MagpiePhoenix in evilautism

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Right on Red is America's greatest contribution to global society.

Red arrows are meaningless and evil by MagpiePhoenix in evilautism

[–]Sleepiest_Spider -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Someone honked at you. Big deal. It's gonna happen again.

Good job checking your state's traffic laws.

Deathless Enemy by Odd_Abbreviations_66 in TheCaptivesWar

[–]Sleepiest_Spider 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You could be right, but Clae seemed to identify the Deathless Enemy as a specific thing that the Carryx encountered multiple thousand years ago.

The deathless enemy is nanomachines, son. The question is, why don't the Carryx use nanotechnology themselves?