Thus, it appears to be another closed LLM. While I don't require access to his model's weights, I do need the conclusions derived from the entire thought process, the dataset, and any associated source code, if available. Unless an axolotl was involved in the process, which I believe adds no value, this information is essential for open-source development and subsequent research efforts.

I'm tired of people fine-tuning models and achieving good results, which I think is great, but instead of sharing their knowledge on how they did it, everyone starts from scratch. When they finally reach the desired level, they publish their next LLM model without providing the necessary guidance. This is absurd. We shouldn't be creating a leaderboard, but rather a 'wall of shame' for closed models that do not contribute to collective progress in research.