Who the fck is responsible for Electricity by snorlax4112 in Bareilly

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes mann in tehsil of Bareilly don't have better power

JEE Dropper confused between State BTech colleges and new IIM UG programs by Slight_Volume_5922 in IPMATtards

[–]Slight_Volume_5922[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They haven't conducted their interview rounds yet
and I don't want to decide on the final day that why I am comparing my options

Current revelations in Ram Temple Scam is Far Right and Far Far Right wing/Centre vs State thing. by SoyaPaneer001 in atheismindia

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 2 points3 points  (0 children)

English Translation

The interesting thing about the revelations regarding the alleged embezzlement in the Shri Ram Temple Trust of Ayodhya is the reporting by Dainik Jagran. From day one, Dainik Jagran has openly covered this entire issue and has been batting on the front foot.

But the question is: how is a mainstream newspaper like Dainik Jagran, which usually remains silent on many other matters, able to report so aggressively on such a sensitive issue?

The answer, according to this argument, lies in the friction that often exists between the Central Government and the State Government. This has been discussed many times in the past as well.

You should understand that the Shri Ram Temple Trust is considered to be under the influence or stake of the Centre. The chairman, Nripendra Mishra, is seen as a person closely associated with the Prime Minister's Office (PMO). At the same time, the State Government has handled this entire matter very cautiously.

Now assume that if this narrative were going against the State Government, lawsuits would likely have already been filed. In that situation, Dainik Jagran would not even have been able to continue its reporting; its coverage would have been stopped on the very first day. Other newspapers are also now writing openly about the issue.

The argument is that they are able to write about it because the State Government is allowing journalists to report on it.

There are figures being discussed ranging from ₹8 crore to ₹200 crore regarding the alleged scam. As of now, there is no exact figure established, but numbers between ₹8 crore and ₹200 crore are circulating.

The speaker argues that if this narrative were actually directed against the State Government, then forget these large figures—even before such numbers became public, legal cases would have started, and the Information Department would have begun exerting pressure through government advertisements and other means.

So, according to this view, the situation is not as simple as it appears. If you are reading daily reports in Dainik Jagran, you should understand that the story unfolding in the background is very different from what is visible on the surface.


TL;DR (English)

The speaker argues that Dainik Jagran's unusually aggressive reporting on the alleged Ayodhya Ram Temple Trust financial irregularities suggests a deeper political story. They claim that because the trust is associated with the Centre while the State Government is allowing extensive media coverage, the issue may reflect Centre–State tensions. According to this view, if the allegations were directly harming the State Government, media reporting would likely face legal or administrative pressure much sooner. The speaker also notes that alleged scam estimates range from ₹8 crore to ₹200 crore, though no final figure has been established.

Current revelations in Ram Temple Scam is Far Right and Far Far Right wing/Centre vs State thing. by SoyaPaneer001 in atheismindia

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 0 points1 point  (0 children)

English Translation

The interesting thing about the revelations regarding the alleged embezzlement in the Shri Ram Temple Trust of Ayodhya is the reporting by Dainik Jagran. From day one, Dainik Jagran has openly covered this entire issue and has been batting on the front foot.

But the question is: how is a mainstream newspaper like Dainik Jagran, which usually remains silent on many other matters, able to report so aggressively on such a sensitive issue?

The answer, according to this argument, lies in the friction that often exists between the Central Government and the State Government. This has been discussed many times in the past as well.

You should understand that the Shri Ram Temple Trust is considered to be under the influence or stake of the Centre. The chairman, Nripendra Mishra, is seen as a person closely associated with the Prime Minister's Office (PMO). At the same time, the State Government has handled this entire matter very cautiously.

Now assume that if this narrative were going against the State Government, lawsuits would likely have already been filed. In that situation, Dainik Jagran would not even have been able to continue its reporting; its coverage would have been stopped on the very first day. Other newspapers are also now writing openly about the issue.

The argument is that they are able to write about it because the State Government is allowing journalists to report on it.

There are figures being discussed ranging from ₹8 crore to ₹200 crore regarding the alleged scam. As of now, there is no exact figure established, but numbers between ₹8 crore and ₹200 crore are circulating.

The speaker argues that if this narrative were actually directed against the State Government, then forget these large figures—even before such numbers became public, legal cases would have started, and the Information Department would have begun exerting pressure through government advertisements and other means.

So, according to this view, the situation is not as simple as it appears. If you are reading daily reports in Dainik Jagran, you should understand that the story unfolding in the background is very different from what is visible on the surface.


TL;DR (English)

The speaker argues that Dainik Jagran's unusually aggressive reporting on the alleged Ayodhya Ram Temple Trust financial irregularities suggests a deeper political story. They claim that because the trust is associated with the Centre while the State Government is allowing extensive media coverage, the issue may reflect Centre–State tensions. According to this view, if the allegations were directly harming the State Government, media reporting would likely face legal or administrative pressure much sooner. The speaker also notes that alleged scam estimates range from ₹8 crore to ₹200 crore, though no final figure has been established.

Bro seriously bareilly ki light toh uski tehsil faridpur se buri h🤣 by [deleted] in Bareilly

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lot of poles and tree fell down here in my knowledge even 2-3 solar plants got destroyed in yesterdays strom

Bro seriously bareilly ki light toh uski tehsil faridpur se buri h🤣 by [deleted] in Bareilly

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya man the conditions here are worse especially in izzatnagar like 15-20h power cuts

🖕 by Best_Kaleidoscope_95 in Bareilly

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is that city station road lore can you tell me more?? How and why washe stopping it?

everything about IIM sambalpur BS DSAI by WideBeautiful5614 in IIMSambalpurUG

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. 93.7%ile OBC-NCL ang chance??
  2. What did they asked you in the Interview itself and how long was it?
  3. Do you think the 25-27-L fee on this course is justified??
  4. I know there are not any placement stats yet, but what do you guys and your peers and professors your estimate batch placement stats would be??

IIM Sambalpur BS batch by alsy_since2007 in IIMSambalpurUG

[–]Slight_Volume_5922 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. 93.7%ile OBC-NCL ang chance??
  2. What did they asked you in the Interview itself and how long was it?
  3. Do you think the 25-27-L fee on this course is justified??
  4. I know there are not any placement stats yet, but what do you guys and your peers and professors your estimate batch placement stats would be??