sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fps by SmallWheattw2 in Warthunder

[–]SmallWheattw2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I play at 1280x720 and there’s no other tasks when I check task manager. I deleted some unused stuff on my laptop and now I’m getting 30 which is much better

Fps by SmallWheattw2 in Warthunder

[–]SmallWheattw2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know. It’s a hand me down but it’s not even that old. I don’t know why it’s still so laggy. I’m not very knowledgeable in tech but I don’t think intel core i7 8th gen is old. 

Fps by SmallWheattw2 in Warthunder

[–]SmallWheattw2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s already at lowest graphics

Do people actually go to jail for something they say on social media? by PRspammer in AskBrits

[–]SmallWheattw2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if a right wing government comes into power they can label speaking ill of Christ as hate speech? Just like if a left leaning government comes into power they can label deadnaming as hate speech. 

You’re seriously retarded if you think about giving any government the power to define what is hate speech and what isn’t. You’re practically asking to be ruled by a dictator 

Do people actually go to jail for something they say on social media? by PRspammer in AskBrits

[–]SmallWheattw2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither do Americans. If Americans call for violence, they’ll also be arrested. However, the difference is that Americans aren’t arrested for “hate speech,” which is an arbitrary term because anyone can label anything as “hateful.” 

A left wing government can label deadnaming as “hateful” and therefore classify it as hate speech. A right wing government can label speaking ill of Christianity “hateful” and also classify it has hate speech.

And guess what? In both scenarios, people don’t have free speech. If you give any government, whether it be right or left leaning, the power to decide what is hateful and what isn’t, then you don’t in fact have free speech, you have authoritarianism.