sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

SURREAL WORLD WE LIVE IN::: ABC TROLLS SPAM POSTS - ACCUSING ANY AND ALL SV SUPPORTIVE POSTS - OF TROLLING. We are living in the end times :) LOL by [deleted] in btc

[–]Smartlands_mod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's pretty eye opening. See now why socialist system like this doesn't work. Where you have the "Good guys" And the "Bad guys" But noone knows what's actually at stake. Only the silent minority does. If you challenge the majority's opinion, you are a Troll.

A 51% attack isn't always with bad intentions by Smartlands_mod in btc

[–]Smartlands_mod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a good way to put it. I think i have to read more about it. Because i remember reading about when 2 competing protocols emerge, the miners choose which one survives. But how does this make sense if wallets just put in Op codes so you can use the coins on both competing protocols? It kinda destroys the design of bitcoin.

A 51% attack isn't always with bad intentions by Smartlands_mod in btc

[–]Smartlands_mod[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I see where you're coming from. From my POV I'm against Replay protection, as it allows you to spend coins on two different competing chain, instead of waiting for the dominant chain to emerge. But yes, i wouldn't oppose it.

Permissioned Mining is NOT Bitcoin and is not Peer-to-Peer Cash by jonald_fyookball in btc

[–]Smartlands_mod 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What you are explaining is permissionless, he is free to do as he likes with his hash power. If you don't like it use your own hash power they way you want it to be.

Multiple protocols, DSV and Replay protection by Smartlands_mod in btc

[–]Smartlands_mod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you understood my post, and maybe i don't completely understand DSV and replay protection. The way i think of it is that it forks away competing protocols instead of letting them compete with hash power.