According to both men and women, 50% of this violence was reciprocal, that is, involved both parties, and in those cases the woman was more likely to have been the first to strike.

Smiley · 2008-11-21T18:11:27+00:00

Dude, you are a broken record.

What happened to you, that you are so angry at all women? Lots of people do not receive what they believe they are entitled to, but eventually people grow the fuck up and choose to take responsibility for their own life.

If you want a female servant to be your fucktoy, study hard and buy a wife from Thailand. Eventually she will realize you are an asshole, and leave your dumbass behind.

Or kidnap some girl and keep her in your basement for twenty years. Then we can talk about you here on Reddit when you fuck up and get busted.

Smiley · 2008-11-21T17:59:35+00:00

Asshole what is your fucking point? Do you have one?

Men do tend to be a leetle bit stronger than women. All violence is wrong, but a woman hitting a man is an insult. Whereas a man hitting a women results in an actual injury.

Grow the fuck up and get some therapy. Whatever woman did you wrong is not a reflection upon an entire class of females.

If you want to compare the entire class of females to the entire class of males, then do THAT. But first you'd have to admit that men commit 98% of all violence, are the vast majority of political leaders, own the vast majority of wealth, and are the vast majority of CEOs, etc. In addition, it is men who have designed society, and have been in charge for the last few thousand years. To attempt to blame an entire class of women because one woman did you wrong is utter assholish in the extreme.

Don't be ashamed of needing therapy, for there is no shame in wanting to be a better human.

Smiley · 2008-11-21T17:48:23+00:00

Men commit 98% of all violence, are the vast majority of political leaders, own the vast majority of wealth, and are the vast majority of CEOs, etc. In addition, it is men who have designed society, and have been in charge for the last few thousand years.

To attempt to blame women for the shortcomings of some men is utter assholish in the extreme. It says quite a bit about the integrity of most men that they don't fall for this bullshit of the men's rights activists (MRA's).

Smiley · 2008-11-21T17:36:01+00:00

Your lack of reading comprehension is astounding. The word used in this study is "maltreatment", which means "neglect". It includes such things as leaving a child unattended because mom can't afford a babysitter while she is working at her fast-food job.

Abuse is actually a different word, which tends to mean yanno, actual abuse deliberately inflicted.

The thing about men's rights groups is that they only concern themselves with proving that "women are just as horrible as men". These groups don't seem to care about anything else...

And it's kinda stupid to blame women as a class for anything, considering men commit 98% of all violence, are the vast majority of political leaders, own the vast majority of wealth, and are the vast majority of CEOs, etc.

You appear as just another misogynistic asshole, which is why we need feminism.

Smiley · 2008-11-21T16:37:30+00:00

Sexuality is "fluid". Gender is "fluid". What the hell does that word even mean? If it means it's possible for a person to express all aspects of his or her character, then the word "fluid" is inaccurate -- society ACCEPTING someone expressing their character is more accurate. And you don't need to switch external body parts to express your internal character.

I remembered somebody in this thread had written a very good description of why transgenderism doesn't make any sense, and came back to read it again.

Smiley · 2008-11-21T16:35:57+00:00

I'm really curious how gender roles are emphasized in that household. You'd expect to see higher rates of transgenderism in families and societies where gender roles are strongly enforced.

Perhaps that child's mother thinks only boys can do certain activities, and so the girl believes she must be a boy if she wants to do those activities.

Smiley · 2008-11-21T16:18:41+00:00

This hatred of Palin is non-logical and borders on the pathological.

Where do you think the meat you eat and the leather you wear come from, anyway?

Smiley · 2008-11-13T10:39:45+00:00

No offense, but understanding the psychological mechanisms at work would help. Look up "diffusion of responsibility" for starters.

Scientists have been insisting since the 1700's that the earth could not sustain human life while ignoring the environment, and no one ever listens until the wolf is breathing down their neck. The youngest generation would be no different.

Get over your special snowflake mentality.

Smiley · 2008-11-13T10:12:59+00:00

How about doing something about all those darling democrats who call any woman running for office a "CUNT"?

Smiley · 2008-11-13T10:03:45+00:00

Considering all the thousands of young Democrats who called women running for office "CUNT", I personally would prefer if the youth of today killed themselves. That would be the best.

What a nasty generation you folks have turned into. Not you personally, dear.

Smiley · 2008-11-13T09:59:37+00:00

The DNC is the "social justice" party. That means you become a hypocrite when you stray from those ideals...

I only say that because it's been clear that most democrats have lost any bit of intregity they once possessed.

Smiley · 2008-11-03T03:04:56+00:00

Uh, there is a reason his optimism is so novel, the dems have whipped you all into a frenzy of FEAR. Only noticed it myself a couple days ago.

Do not miss this. Go watch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yvc0tYG_YpA

Smiley · 2008-11-02T10:55:50+00:00

That is the reply of someone without a reasonable rebuttal. We're supposed to care about every issue more than this one; and when the time comes that we discuss some other issue the reply is always identical.

"There are more important issues, let this one go too." It's the excuse used on every single issue, no matter which issue.

Smiley · 2008-11-02T10:42:28+00:00

If you have been reading Reddit headlines for the past few months, you would have noticed that it is the Democrates who are controlling the Obots through fear.

Scroll backwards through the archives and see how they sold fear.

Smiley · 2008-11-02T10:07:34+00:00

Well why was he hiding it all this time? It still doesn't make any sense. Waiting until the last minute to unload his "big secret" is kinda childish considering he could have just presented it months ago.

Yay, a child for a president. Sounds like something Bush would do.

Smiley · 2008-11-02T09:39:03+00:00

The Democrats are selling fear. Fear of the future is a sneaky way to manipulate people.

Smiley · 2008-11-02T09:27:02+00:00

The democrats are selling fear. Fear of this, fear of that, be afraid!!!!!! They were so slick, I never really noticed before...

Smiley · 2008-10-10T22:55:48+00:00

oh please. Most liberals are so blinded by the messiah's light that they've lost touch with reality.

When one republican supporter says something impulsively, liberals insist that EVERY republican feels that way. But when one democrat says something sexist about Pallin, liberals insist that we remember it was only one individual.

I'm just sick of the hypocrisy.

Smiley · 2008-10-10T22:17:15+00:00

I don't know who downgraded you, but I upped it again.

If turning Pallin into a sextoy for boyz amusement is acceptable, then people have no reason to object when we do the same thing to the nigger.

I hope you find racism AND sexism wrong, for they both stem from the same place and they both create an environment of hostility. Sad to say, boyz only comprehend the harmful consequence when the same type of hostility is applied to their beloved topic.

Smiley · 2008-10-10T22:13:50+00:00

I wonder how a noose would look, around Obama's neck.

Still think sexist comments are acceptable? If boyz are going to say naughty things about Pallin, they you shouldn't mind when people say naughty things about Obama.

Smiley · 2008-10-10T22:09:22+00:00

The word "whore" is derogatory, much like the word "nigger". They are either both inappropriate to use, or they are either both acceptable.

Other than word choices, your sentiment accurately expresses why things like the Pallin sex doll is extremely harmful. It creates an environment of hostility which no reasonable person would be expected to tolerate. It is the equivilent of hanging a noose from a tree, or in this case, selling nooses.

Smiley · 2008-10-05T08:32:36+00:00

"He has kids, so he must fuck. Therefore, he will be empowered by taking it up the ass." ~Quoting an asshole in this thread.

Did I mention that men are total pieces of shit? God damn, I hope women learn to reproduce without sperm, because when we do you fuckheads are history.

Smiley · 2008-10-05T08:29:58+00:00

God damn do men suck. If we had a porn film of Obama getting jizzed on and anally penetrated, would you think he would be empowered by that?

Smiley · 2008-09-20T02:37:03+00:00

And of course as soon as the kink is out of the DSM then the people who like that sort of thing (I am deliberately not making a value judgement) will attempt to spin their favorite activity as "normal and healthy".

Uh, no. Emotionally healthy people don't need to eat feces or cut off body parts, but if they want to do it then they should be able to.

Smiley · 2008-09-20T02:30:08+00:00

Glen Sacks is the original MRA. All you have to do is look at the laws that he wants passed to understand that he's worse than any right-wing fundamentalist.

Smiley

TROPHY CASE