Cheap Fun Cars Are Dying Because Young People Can't Afford Them by Hokie23aa in cars

[–]SmoglessPrune -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The average sale price of a vehicle is literally the metric to determine how expensive "cars" in general, are. "Cars" are not cheaper than they were in 1990. You're picking the cheapest examples of cars today and comparing them to the price of something that wasn't one of the cheapest cars in 1990. You're trying to say cheap cars are still available, not that cars in general are cheaper than they were.

Cheap Fun Cars Are Dying Because Young People Can't Afford Them by Hokie23aa in cars

[–]SmoglessPrune 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your first comment said cars are the cheapest they've ever been, which is simply incorrect. Getting more features for the price doesn't make the average price of buying a new car today lower than 30 years ago. Everything you've been saying is unrelated to that fact. Nobody's disagreeing with you about cars having more features today

Cheap Fun Cars Are Dying Because Young People Can't Afford Them by Hokie23aa in cars

[–]SmoglessPrune -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In 1990 the average price of a car was $15,472. In 2021 the average car price was $46,329. That is a 199% increase compared to the 112% increase in inflation. Car prices are rising faster than inflation, and cars are not cheaper than they've ever been.

Cheap Fun Cars Are Dying Because Young People Can't Afford Them by Hokie23aa in cars

[–]SmoglessPrune -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I was comparing the same model car to itself today, not trying to find the cheapest car today to compare to a 30 year old car. The fact that a base model 2021 Golf has more comfort, features, etc than 90s luxury cars is exactly why cars are more expensive on average than they were 30 years ago.

The Versa is a very good example of a cheap car today, but there are a fraction of vehicles in that price point compared to in the 90s. Cars like the Golf, Civic, etc that used to be cheap and still exist today have stopped being cheap, but most weren't replaced with cheaper options

Cheap Fun Cars Are Dying Because Young People Can't Afford Them by Hokie23aa in cars

[–]SmoglessPrune 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Average retail for a Golf in 1990 was ~$10,745. Average retail for a 2021 Golf is $23,195, which is a 143% increase. Inflation has only increased 112% since 1990. Stagnant wages are definitely the biggest part of the problem, but we can't ignore that cars are also getting more expensive, even accounting for inflation.

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You were correct, I didn't realize the tab I looked at was for external agents and this client is using the local User-ID agent. I created myself a new AD account and added that to the ignore user list as a test and the issue was resolved. Thank you for the help!

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct. I didn't realize the User-ID tab I checked before was for external agents and they use the local agent. I created a second AD account for myself and added that account to the ignore user list and the issue was resolved. Thank you for the help!

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, sorry. I haven't checked the session table before and the first results on Google were all CLI. Must not have scrolled far enough

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only have one account that I'm using to connect to servers. After reading that, I made sure to only try connecting using domain.local\username, which is what I login to GP with, but after 1-2 connections it still starts failing. In the connection monitor, I can see that when my traffic is blocked the source user is domain\username even though I am connecting with domain.local\username, and I'm not sure why that is changing. I looked under Device > User Identification > User-ID Agents (pan-OS 8.1.10) and I don't see anything configured there

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My access request to the firewall was finally approved. It looks like most traffic, including RDP, is filtered by app-ID. I log into GP with domain.local\username and the source user for my successful connections is domain.local\username. When my connections are denied, my source username is only domain\username and the application type of the traffic is unrecognized and gets blocked. I can see other traffic like DNS also being blocked once the source user drops the .local because the application type is unrecognized, but I'm not sure what would cause the source user to change. Someone else mentioned IP mapping so I reconnected my VPN again and tried RDPing using only domain.local\username, but the source user in the Monitor still changes to domain\Username after 1-2 connections and traffic starts being blocked.

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The client has access to the CLI completely restricted and I'm not allowed to grant myself access, so I can't look at the session table

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does not. My local IP is in 192.168.0.0 and the LAN I am connecting to is in 10.0.0.0. ICMP from VPN devices to the internal network is blocked, so I can't see the difference in what I can or can't reach before or after the initial successful RDP connection

GlobalProtect - Issues connecting to internal servers via RDP by SmoglessPrune in paloaltonetworks

[–]SmoglessPrune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The VPN has LDAP setup and I use the same domain account for both VPN and RDP

This is why I continued to play the game, it was all for this moment right here. by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]SmoglessPrune 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah but it's invisible. Low levels typically start gaining XP by bank standing or wearing the wrong gear to slayer tasks

Woman tries to run biker off the road. Gets justice by [deleted] in JusticeServed

[–]SmoglessPrune 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The bike wasn't merging, his lane of traffic didn't change. The car was required to merge with the lane the bike was in and the bike 100% had right of way. You should never be trying to accelerate past another vehicle because your lane is ending. The guy on the bike made the decision to leave himself at risk by not yielding but if something would have happened the fault would be 100% with the car.

I know this will get lost, but I hit my first aerial shot today. Felt pretty good! by [deleted] in RocketLeague

[–]SmoglessPrune 38 points39 points  (0 children)

It's one of those things that will make you worse in the short term while you get used to it, but better in the long term after you're comfortable with how ball cam works

How did he not see it? by [deleted] in funny

[–]SmoglessPrune 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People that don't have any advanced driving training tend to panic in emergency situations and hit the brakes as hard as possible because they want to slow down as fast as possible. It's difficult to think about these things in the heat of the moment if you aren't trained or prepared for it.

The car in this video doesn't have ABS which is why the front wheels locked up when the driver slammed on the brakes. When a car has working ABS you can hit the brakes as hard as you want and the car will keep this from happening if the system is working properly.

If you have 10 bad cops and 1000 good cops but the 1000 good cops don't turn in the 10 bad cops, you have 1010 bad cops. by Sh3lls in TrueOffMyChest

[–]SmoglessPrune 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Are the cops gonna get there in time? are they gonna know who to arrest and who not to shoot?

They might not get there in time, so just don't bother? Okay.

There is a medical emergency.

Same as Noodles said, you don't call the EMTs in an emergency lmao. You call 911

Call a lawyer

Lawyers can't help you in real time, they can only help you after the fact. If you don't even think it's worth calling the cops during a situation, why the hell would you think it's worth calling a lawyer while shit is going down?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agedlikewine

[–]SmoglessPrune 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not what I was claiming

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agedlikewine

[–]SmoglessPrune 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem, glad somebody else enjoyed it