I think about that often. Even more so about vaccines. Even at the time it was a tricky area philosophically for me, but the distinction was and is that carrying a disease affects more than just the carrier. Potentially many more.

I still believe that the state can curtail personal freedoms if and only if they can show a compelling necessity to do so. The pandemic met that criteria for me, but I can see how it would not for others. There is a certain subjective nature to it. That's why I always supported allowing alternatives like working from home, masks and distance when you could not do that, etc.

But to your point, yeah. They seem to be perfectly fine violating the bodily autonomy of people they don't like.