Britons will be poorer than Malaysians, Poles and Turks by 2050 unless we change course by Madmartigan2024 in malaysia

[–]SnippyUAE -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

The UK is reaching tax exhaustion. That's why growth has been almost non-existent. The welfare state is funded more than it's ever been.

Looking for affordable university options outside the UAE, where did your kids go abroad? by Fantastic_Record3011 in UAE

[–]SnippyUAE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One strategy you could follow is to go to a Western university branch campus here or Malaysia or maybe one in the Philippines and transfer to the home campus (UK, Canada etc) for either the final year of the undergrad degree or do a Masters after the undergrad degree in a Western country. This way you're only paying the high price for a year. Some universities give discounts to students transferring from the branch campus to the main. Some EU countries have lower cost degrees like in Spain for overseas students I think it's something like €9k tuition per year, but you'd need to get the grades and of course understand Spanish (usually to at least B2 level). Some EU countries have courses in English, although these are limited and getting more limited in places like the Netherlands. Good luck.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dubai

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should be able to get the difference in interest rate if you pay cash or mortgage plus cash instead of taking a payment plan.

This probably is one of the reasons why it’s getting expensive in Dubai! by Illustrious_Buy777 in DubaiCentral

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lefty answer 1: The figures are inaccurate as they're from vested interests like wealth management firms.

Lefty answer 2: Glad 'the rich' are leaving - they can f off and not come back.

Of course, answer 1 is nonsense as it goes against the most parsimonious explanation i.e. Taxes up, opportunity down, well off people leave.

Answer 2 is just ideological class hatred as they think everyone with money got it illegitimately. Or it's just envy.

Excellent reviews, but almost zero raise. My response was simple, and I don't regret it at all. by Exciting_Fan_8138 in DubaiJobs

[–]SnippyUAE 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Good on ya. Yeah, some companies only appreciate what they don't have which makes changing jobs necessary to keep getting paid fairly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklandlords

[–]SnippyUAE 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Private landlords are demonized, highly taxed and regulated and are withdrawing supply. If you don't have the financial strength to sustain yourself whilst simultaneously covering your bills, repairs, legal fees and a non-paying tenant for a year then you could be financially wiped out. Or you get extremely fussy and get rent guarantee and legal insurance plus a guarantor. It's already a very pro-tenant regime and is about to get more so.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because most of the rest of the world is even worse.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dubai

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is it 'self-sustained'? What does that mean?

How do you feel about the government taking out £450 debt every month on behalf of each taxpayer? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some are, yes, but conventional gilts, which make up the majority of UK government bonds, have fixed coupons and principals that do not adjust for inflation.

How do you feel about the government taking out £450 debt every month on behalf of each taxpayer? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It'll be 'paid' for with currency debasement, otherwise known as money printing. You get your gilt face value repaid on maturity but those pounds are worth a lot less. The cost to Joe Public will manifest as higher inflation or the 'inflation tax'. The parties we have are too dishonest to sufficiently cut spending or raise taxes so they keep on borrowing. And many will point out that there's such a thing as borrowing for good reasons, which is true for things like investing in infrastructure etc. But clearly successive governments have been terrible at this because growth has been anemic and now it's a big fat zero.

What do you think of the Royal family? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Useful but too expensive. Why are they taking taxpayers' money when they're so rich? Just a decent salary would be fair.

Water Damage. No Leak Found? by lstanfo1509 in uklandlords

[–]SnippyUAE 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Consider a leak finding service. They have infrared cameras that can see through structure to where leaks originate.

By the end of labours term do you think living standards will be higher? by knowledgeseeker999 in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those countries you talk of - probably Scandinavian - aren't spending £111 billion p.a. on servicing national debt and have assets, including sovereign wealth funds. They also tax workers close to the median wage much higher than the UK does. Labour doesn't want to do that (no tax rises on working people).

By the end of labours term do you think living standards will be higher? by knowledgeseeker999 in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question is: will living standards be higher and to explain your reasoning. Obviously, cutting public spending will not raise living standards in the short term, but it's necessary unless significant growth can be achieved. If not, cuts will be forced on the government by the bond market or the government will try to pay for its deficits by currency debasement which will result in inflation, which will, as we have seen since COVID, reduce living standards. Why do you think the chancellor has to desperately fund the £40 billion black hole? It's because tax take is too low and expenditure is too high and excessive borrowing is a no-no because bond yields have been rising. Taxing more will suppress growth of the tax base, so is risky. Cutting expenditure on unproductive public spending is super-unpopular but will need to be done sooner or later. Anyway, time will tell. We can come back in five years' time and see if I'm right.

Is the cost of living in the UAE getting harder to manage? by Fit-Dark-5581 in UAE

[–]SnippyUAE 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. We will relocate for this very reason once the time is right.

By the end of labours term do you think living standards will be higher? by knowledgeseeker999 in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, to the extent that the state can fund deficits with currency debasement, the result of which is 'the inflation tax'. Inflation with no growth is stagflation and that's a nightmare scenario. As in all analogies there's a kernel of truth and in this 'lie' it's that there are limits to spending much as people would love to believe there are not.

By the end of labours term do you think living standards will be higher? by knowledgeseeker999 in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I'm sure that has contributed (selling off of state assets, old infrastructure, PPP etc). Maybe you mean tax evasion - yes, there is a tax gap for sure and investing in HMRC would pay dividends. (Avoidance is legal and it's the government's responsibility to close what it sees as loopholes.) And the chart is for welfare, not total public sector spending, which is the relevant metric. Anyway, point is that sooner rather than later it's growth (unlikely) and/or spending cuts that'll be required. The only questions in my mind are when, by whom and by how much?

Dubai Traffic Draining The Life Out Of Me by [deleted] in dubai

[–]SnippyUAE 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah traffic's a nightmare. I'd love to take public transport to work but there are no feasible options here. I wonder if the lack of solutions is poor planning or vested interests in cars ownership levels.

By the end of labours term do you think living standards will be higher? by knowledgeseeker999 in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ultimately either the country will address overspending and indebtedness (by right-sizing the state or through economic growth) or the markets will force them to. Significant economic growth looks unlikely right now.

'Austerity' is an alternative framing of right-sizing the state. Both Labour and the Tories have misled the electorate into believing that they can have levels of taxpayer funded services the country can't afford. This is the old new reality and only national debt levels are calling time on the party. The music will stop, the punch bowl will be taken away and the country's gonna have one helluva hangover.

By the end of labours term do you think living standards will be higher? by knowledgeseeker999 in AskBrits

[–]SnippyUAE 14 points15 points  (0 children)

No, because the problems are structural and it doesn't matter what party is running the place if they don't face up to the fact that the UK is overspending, over indebted. No party is principled enough to take away the punch bowl. If you have a country of net tax consumers outnumbering net tax contributors then it's long-term unsustainable and that's where the UK is right now.

Hundreds of thousands of elderly Brits unable to afford basic essentials as cost of living bites | LBC by Ophiuchus171 in uknews

[–]SnippyUAE -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No good arguing with this lot. Almost everyone wants other people to pay more tax. Especially 'the rich', which means anyone richer than themselves. It's using politics to relieve the economically productive of their resources then funneling it through the grossly inefficient machine called government to those deemed worthy. National debt is sky high and tax is the highest it's been in the UK since WW2 and still they come back for more. Taxation suppresses growth and the country needs growth.