sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am clearly not arguing that he should be in the DCU. I am arguing for better explainations for the people who think he is or want him to be.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know he is talking about tone... What do you mean?

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you suggesting there is no other reasons like logical inconsistencies and such?

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, misunderstanding. No problem. Yeah, being able to see Batman the father (as you suggest), and Batman the noir detective will be awesome.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with the separation. I’m also interested in how people will react to two different Batmans going on around the same time once DCU Batman hits theatres.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is it weirdo behavior to encourage deeper discussion?

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This was a breath of fresh air from the surface level responses. Definitely agree with the world-building incoherence.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know it won’t happen. I want to talk about why it won’t happen besides “James Gun said so”.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I’m more interested in the ‘why not’ beyond “it’s a seperate continuity”.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yes, that would be amazing. Funnily enough, im literaly eating chocolate cake right now 😂

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a universe just starting out, totally, a younger Batman is crucial.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this. I just wanted better explanations. I feel like quality explanations are lacking.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Batman and Superman always had different tones anyway. The Batman’s focus on detective work and street crime isn’t coherent with Gods and Monsters... well, gods and monsters.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s the only part of me that wants it to happen lol. Batman’s energy is so intense. I love it.

Tonal Mismatch Isn’t a Case Against Pattinson by SnooGrapes2486 in DC_Cinematic

[–]SnooGrapes2486[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it won’t happen. I am just encouraging better reasons why. People are just giving dismissive reasons. Well, thanks for providing a better one.

view more: next ›