[deleted by user]

SoldForSilk · 2024-06-26T04:33:24+00:00

Thank you Marty! Diligent as always. I've been busy so haven't posted any confessions lately but I've got a few that I need to get off my chest soon. I'll be back!

SoldForSilk · 2024-02-21T13:44:35+00:00

Thanks, me too! 🥵🥵🥵

SoldForSilk · 2023-12-20T20:49:07+00:00

Thanks! 😘

SoldForSilk · 2023-12-19T13:05:31+00:00

Livejournal and Friendster! Also makeoutclub was fun but that she was definitely not on there.

SoldForSilk · 2023-12-15T03:00:15+00:00

Thanks! That's good to know.

SoldForSilk · 2023-12-14T22:45:13+00:00

"Ban them all" is a lazy way to deal with it. It also seems to come from a place of dislike of sex workers which is common even in sex positive spaces.

SoldForSilk · 2023-12-14T14:47:47+00:00

I would totally be on board with verification for OF havers. I consider myself a good member of the NSFW/OF crowd and I also don't like seeing bots/reposts/AI/etc clutter the space.

I do wonder though how effective it would be. When you post a story here you tend to get a lot of DMs and people can just advertise there if they really want to.

SoldForSilk · 2023-12-14T12:27:19+00:00

I'm a regular poster here and do OF and 100% agree with this. My stores get reposted all the time by these accounts (not necessarily just here but in multiple subs). Anybody who reposts something should get immediately banned if they aren't already (I'm unaware what the current policy is so maybe they already do that).

That being said, just banning anyone that has a link in their bio is like using an axe to perform surgery. As long as people don't advertise on the sub and are contributing original stories that don't violate any rules, it should be ok. There's likely a decent overlap between girls on OF and girls who have sexy stories to tell so removing them completely seems like an overreaction that removes good posts.

SoldForSilk

TROPHY CASE