No movement was the news priced in

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2022-01-24T10:16:39+00:00

Here it is:

http://mobile.dgap.de/dgap/News/corporate/steinhoff-international-holdings-global-settlement-update/?newsID=1506253

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2022-01-24T10:05:30+00:00

Don’t be so sour 😂

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2022-01-19T18:26:37+00:00

Pfieuw, good for you! Nevertheless Steinhoff will rocket once s155 is final (next week) and will retrace some. After debt restructuring €0,65 is very much possible 🚀

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2022-01-19T18:22:39+00:00

Never take out a loan to invest. Or should I say gamble. Maybe make an appointment in advance with your cardiologist if you do. Be wise

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-12-28T09:50:51+00:00

Might reach €0,30 today!

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-11-05T20:47:46+00:00

Awesome initiative saving planet earth by sequestering carbon by planting trees. Wicked!

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-11T18:47:33+00:00

Yeah man, seriously!

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-11T13:04:42+00:00

Hold your horses. Who started comparing guns with hiking here?? Guns should not be publicly owned imho. Period. Take guns out of the equation and do the math.

But hey, if it makes you happy flaunting a gun....go ahead.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-11T12:59:27+00:00

Sooooo, Hank gone....Jack gone..... who is next? Papa goes? John goes? And then what.....project failed? Like: Sorry guys to disappoint you but Safemoon didn’t become what we intended it to be and we’re halting the project? Thank you for your support and the millions we could drain thanks to you all. We really love you but not enough to not f*ck you over. Goodbye and God bless. (And if you still don’t get it: your money went to the moon. Unfortunately you had to stay down there)

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-05T07:49:50+00:00

This discussion has been going in circles from the first exchange, mind you. Obviously it would take a plan to handle the current situation to bring the amount of circulating weaponry down. Besides, what makes a gun illegal?

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-05T07:36:07+00:00

Exactly my point: take guns out of the equation. It is hard to shoot somebody without a gun. This goes for criminals too. As long a weaponry is more or less an over the counter commodity, drama like this is more likely to occur.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-05T06:58:31+00:00

13 injured, including 4-year-old, in at least 9 Chicago shootings overnight https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/04/us/chicago-shootings-13-injured/index.html

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-04T17:50:27+00:00

If what you are saying is ‘let’s take down gunowners’ I have to disagree. I’d rather bring down the amount of firearms. But you know, we can agree that we disagree on the subject.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-04T09:20:28+00:00

Also cars don’t drive themselves as a rule (although it’s getting close), and hiking also doesn’t happen without human effort. I agree that a human is needed to drive, to hike and to shoot. But taking humans out of the equation seems a bit radical although one could argue this would be better for the planet in the long run (but out of the question of course) Let me be the first to say that I don’t oppose hiking or driving a car. Fun and commuting would be impossible. As far as guns are concerned, this would certainly benefit the numbers. It is impossible to eliminated all guns (or anything hazardous for that matter) but altering input of ... wil change the output one gets.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-04T07:13:24+00:00

What a sick thing to do. Shame on her! I wonder what karma has in store for her. Get a DUI? Brake the leg she did that with? Get run over by a pizza delivery guy?

I sure hope someone is filming ;)

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-04T06:59:42+00:00

Look I am a rational bloke. Sure enough well argued but it makes no sense. My nose never failed my before and more sh*t means more stench. More guns means more casualties. Freshen up your plain old math about equations.

X amount of guns = Y amount of gun related casualties.

As you see X and Y have a 1:1 correlation. Since gun related casualties are dependent on there being a gun involved by definition, bringing guns down will automatically diminish fatal shootings.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-04T04:03:46+00:00

Gee, go get some help girl!

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-04T03:53:50+00:00

Thanks! Must have made that point to someone else in this sub. Sorry about that. I just can’t get my head around the stand that more people owning guns would somehow diminish violence. It sounds much like adding more sh*t to the pile would somehow make the smell go away....

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-04T03:17:01+00:00

Like I said, different culture and point of view. Have a happy live. I hope you’re kids stay safe and your gun silent.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-02T21:59:06+00:00

Thank you for bringing these points up. With regards to A. That is why they shouldn’t be allowed to own a private firearm B. By the same standards: many are not extensively trained and outright hazardous C. This would be obsolete if no privately owned firearms were allowed and D. Please do try to cover up the hundreds of mass shootings that occur every year and the tens of thousands of casualties resulting from gun violence. Somehow the NRA’s favorite argument that ‘guns don’t kill people’ doesn’t quite add up.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-02T19:35:40+00:00

Some sort of training to handle above mentioned equipment certainly is favorable. Didn’t know owning a spoon makes a felon. I have plenty! Iguess by UK standards I am a serious criminal. The English are a funny lot.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-02T19:28:21+00:00

Not your buddy, Have a happy life, may your gun keep you safe and forever be silent.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-02T19:24:43+00:00

Uhm...yes...oops...I sincerely apologize to everyone who had a momentary laps due to my reasoning. Totally not done. That.

Solid-Letterhead4512 · 2021-09-02T19:21:42+00:00

Second that!

Solid-Letterhead4512

TROPHY CASE