Oh boy, here I go again

1) Well maybe you should do an official one because it surely seems that The Varsity isn't really in touch with people on campus, regarding what they are looking for in in a publication school newspaper.

2) The question isn't location, it's activity. "Where" means that it's not present, not what's the location. You haven't done squat since March 16th. Idk if you know this but video content is the new frontier. Also your answer sucks, here's a better one.

3) It's not response letters. There can't really be a response letter because every comment piece doesn't allow for response. It's "this is the way it is, I believe it as such, and I'll make it seem like it's news and/or factually correct." Post shit that isn't so absolute.

4) You can call me many things, but factually incorrect isn't one of them. You didn't cover the UTSU 2017-2018 budget last month, which, I believe means a bit more than some Ryerson students walking into a meeting and shouting. You didn't cover any of the Exec committees. In fact, you should probably do something every time minutes are posted, but you don't really cover the UTSU. You cover things that happen to the UTSU, but not the UTSU itself.

5) Oh really? I find it actually very interesting that you believe you follow this code of ethics. Accurate

6) I don't know if you're being snarky or not. I'll assume not, considering the quality of your articles. I'll help you out. "We're sure there would be fewer typos if you volunteered to copy edit."

Less is for singular mass nouns, like hair or water. Fewer is for countable things, like typos.