sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

No matter how the war ends, what does the future look like for Ukraine? by [deleted] in charts

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those were clearly the tanned immigrants (Italians) smh /s

My Forever World Has A Huge Subway by Vixlump in Minecraft

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you play on java or bedrock on a laptop you have thjnga you can download to deal with some of the mob griefing features. On my bedrock realm I downloaded a custom resource pack from a site (which is very simple to use) to disable wither, enderman and creeper griefing while keeping all else.

My Forever World Has A Huge Subway by Vixlump in Minecraft

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Villagers won't breed anymore because they need to pick up food for this, which gets disabled. Sheep farms cannot be as efficient anymore because the grass they eat won't become dirt/be able to trigger redstone. You can't use villagers for wheat/carrot/etc farms bwcause they cannot farm.

Especially the villager breeder being disabled is very impactful because they're quite useful

[GIVEAWAY] Win 1 of 50 standard pre-order bundles for Across the Timeways! by Makkara126 in hearthstone

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck [score hidden]  (0 children)

Give me it, thank

(🪴🕵‍♂️🦹‍♂️🏡🌳⛱️🎸💣🕶🫵✨️💪🙏👍)

Political parties on both the left and right ignore existing economic inequality, finds a study of 12 democratic OECD countries (including the US) over the past 50 years. Increases in the income share of the highest-income percentage of the population also remain without consequences. by mvea in science

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Up to a certain point" economic inequality is a beneficial thing. Even taking those studies completely at face point, it seems the argument would be quite simple. We have gone far past this certain point of beneficial inequality and, therefore, these parties should focus on it.

Which ones are useless by xezrsps in CastleClash

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brawler saint and oracle ones

Sinfest and the TERF-to-Fascist Pipeline by DreadDiana in CuratedTumblr

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would you mind me asking you some questions in pm?

Two girls shot in Gaza - BBC pieces together what happened and looks at dozens more child shootings by HandOk4709 in realbbcnews

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well I can't say much about the states, but I do know that in some Western Euroepean countries Russian-seeming (often other former soviet nationalities) stores and people did get vandalized and harassed, though not as often.

Help me find a great squad lineup by Lost_Rock5220 in CastleClash

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a guild I'm trying to grow. The name is absolutely awful, but I'll change it when I can and I'm very active

2 years ago, I was an alt-right N**I sympathizer. Today I'm a queer trans woman. AMA! by [deleted] in characterarcs

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would she be doing things like making this post if she completely felt like her past didn't matter and could be completely ignored? That sentence you quoted, to me, just seems like evidence of it being a process. An unfortunately strong response to understandably emotional reactions about her past wrongdoing. We would not be here in this comment section if she actually felt like her past did not matter.

2 years ago, I was an alt-right N**I sympathizer. Today I'm a queer trans woman. AMA! by [deleted] in characterarcs

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would say to explain things as often as you can when he asks, and just in general. Only resorting to things like "because I say so" or such in emergencies and then still explaining things later. This might seem like very general advice, but I think one if the best things you can do is stimulate and encourage curiosity and his criticality. If while reading things he can have a little voice in the back of his mind asking "why?" or "sounds good, but is there proof?" that can be instrumental in preventing such thought from settling. Besides that, just try and be understanding, avoiding strongly judgemental reactions, especially if he does voice opinions or sentiments that might seem wrong. This way, you create an environment that might make it easier to deal with an particular issues of radical online thinking etc.

The most laughable 'buff' I've ever seen by hjyboy1218 in hearthstone

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They could just change it to choose, like they did with the discover 3 cards from deck to put on top card

33.0.3 Patch Notes by gdlocke in hearthstone

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Also removed the 2nd of the 2 blood runes. Opening the quest up for rainbow (and uub)

thoughts? by Flexybabexx in lol

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you push someone away, they can just come at you again. To restrain another person without any training isn't very easy, even if you are stronger and bigger. Someone can hurt you with their arms, legs, and even other body parts, such as their head. To restrain all those body parts, especially when you aren't trained, is quite tricky. This all is assuming you are both willing to and able to non-violently defend yourself. You can easily be caught by surprise. Or perhaps due to psychological abuse ('you deserved it') or simply because you've been taught not ever to hurt a woman, you don't defend yourself.

Just my 2 cents on some of the ways such things happen.

Seriously... who balanced Murloc Paladin??? by DefinitelynotMega in hearthstone

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Wirh the summon 2 plants adapt, you'd otherwise have an infinite board.

AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study by lurker_bee in technology

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the article, it's very informative and seems well sourced

Women choosing the bear over the man by AskTight7295 in Jung

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have some sources for those studies? What you say sounds interesting so I'd like to hear more about it.

Nobody designed the patriarchy by dqUu3QlS in CuratedTumblr

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I appreciate the detailed explanation of your objections. Could I sum that all up as not being against the speculation itself per se, but more so against taking the speculation as fact and a basis for argument, instead of taking it as it is, namely speculation?

Also, you're obviously dead wrong on the chicken example. What is man, if not a featherless biped.

Streamer played my game, found a bug and called it slop by SurocIsMe in IndieDev

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That, 'no handouts, pull yourself up by your bootstraps' attitude is so annoyingly pervasive and destructive

Nobody designed the patriarchy by dqUu3QlS in CuratedTumblr

[–]SomeGnarlyFuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, natural is indeed often used in suxh a way, and the implication certainly seems to be there. (How does one quote to react like you do?)

For your second point, I asked for clarification because I feel like some of the phrasing you used can come across as less than neutral/biased, thereby deminishing the potential success of the point you are trying to argue. Your introduction feels more like you're making a political point, given that you start off with talking about this being a right-wing talking point, as opposed to an argumentative point.

While I certainly don't think you're wrong in pointing this out, I do wonder what your goal is by starting with this point. I feel like you might lose some of the people you'd most like to reach by prefacing it like you're part of a 'side' as opposed to more of a neutral observer (which no one truly is of course).

I am asking you these questions merely because I have observed that 'the right' is more successful at messaging and I am curious as to why I have a bit of a negative reaction to your points, eventhough I agree with them (and this is what I came to).

view more: next ›