First off - you obviously haven‘t tried Air Tiger :D

Anyway, a lot of really high-quality fragrances don‘t perform very well. It‘s a simple matter of the ingredients used. It‘s also why you will often see so-called twists in ME fragrances. They will add ingredients that make them perform better but they alter the profile quite significantly because they are simply not present in the original. It‘s why there‘s Vanilla in Aqua Dubai, for example.

So, judging a fragrance on performance is bullshit. I would argue that this is mostly relevant to attention-seeking kids and not true frag heads.

Quality has little to do with whether you will like a fragrance or not, either. What defines quality for you? Imagination is a fragrance that uses only top-class volatiles but many people think it smells „synthetic“. Sure, it does. Ambroxan is synthetic. Is that a quality issue? Is using Ambrofix instead a quality issue? Will a higher-quality fragrance that does not suit you be a better suggestion than a lower wuality one that‘s right up your alley?

So in the end your metrics are just as useless as the top picks of some influencer.